BACKGROUND: Coronary effluent from an isolated perfused heart undergoing ischemic preconditioning can be transferred to precondition another naïve isolated heart. We investigated the effects of this effluent on mitochondrial integrity and function following a global infarct model of ischemia/reperfusion and the role of adenosine in this model of remote preconditioning. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary effluent from isolated perfused rabbit hearts was collected prior to (control effluent) and during three cycles of 5-min ischemia and 10-min reperfusion (IPC effluent). Adenosine concentration was significantly increased in IPC effluent (2.6 ± 1.1 μM) versus control effluent (0.21 ± 0.06 μM, P < 0.01). Infarct size (% necrotic LV mass) after 30-min global ischemia and 90-min reperfusion was significantly reduced in hearts preconditioned with IPC effluent (IPC(eff), 23 ± 7 %) and control effluent supplemented with 2.5 μM exogenous adenosine (C(eff)+ 2.5 μM ADO, 25 ± 10 %) when compared to control effluent perfused hearts (C(eff), 41 ± 8 %, P < 0.05). Compared to C(eff) mitochondria, IPC(eff) mitochondria had preserved complex I/State3 and complex IV/State 3 respiration and outer membrane integrity, and reduced cytochrome c release. In contrast, C(eff) + 2.5 μM ADO mitochondria had improved state 2 respiration and coupling to oxidative phosphorylation, reduced reactive oxygen species production and preserved outer membrane integrity. Administration of adenosine receptor blocker 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline abolished the infarct limiting effect (46 ± 7 %) and the mitochondrial integrity and function preservation of IPC effluent. CONCLUSION: Remote cardioprotection by IPC effluent preserves mitochondrial integrity and function in an adenosine receptor dependent mechanism, and although infarct size reduction can be mimicked by adenosine, IPC effluent contains additional factor(s) contributing to modulation of the mitochondrial response to ischemia/reperfusion injury.
BACKGROUND: Coronary effluent from an isolated perfused heart undergoing ischemic preconditioning can be transferred to precondition another naïve isolated heart. We investigated the effects of this effluent on mitochondrial integrity and function following a global infarct model of ischemia/reperfusion and the role of adenosine in this model of remote preconditioning. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary effluent from isolated perfused rabbit hearts was collected prior to (control effluent) and during three cycles of 5-min ischemia and 10-min reperfusion (IPC effluent). Adenosine concentration was significantly increased in IPC effluent (2.6 ± 1.1 μM) versus control effluent (0.21 ± 0.06 μM, P < 0.01). Infarct size (% necrotic LV mass) after 30-min global ischemia and 90-min reperfusion was significantly reduced in hearts preconditioned with IPC effluent (IPC(eff), 23 ± 7 %) and control effluent supplemented with 2.5 μM exogenous adenosine (C(eff)+ 2.5 μM ADO, 25 ± 10 %) when compared to control effluent perfused hearts (C(eff), 41 ± 8 %, P < 0.05). Compared to C(eff) mitochondria, IPC(eff) mitochondria had preserved complex I/State3 and complex IV/State 3 respiration and outer membrane integrity, and reduced cytochrome c release. In contrast, C(eff) + 2.5 μM ADO mitochondria had improved state 2 respiration and coupling to oxidative phosphorylation, reduced reactive oxygen species production and preserved outer membrane integrity. Administration of adenosine receptor blocker 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline abolished the infarct limiting effect (46 ± 7 %) and the mitochondrial integrity and function preservation of IPC effluent. CONCLUSION: Remote cardioprotection by IPC effluent preserves mitochondrial integrity and function in an adenosine receptor dependent mechanism, and although infarct size reduction can be mimicked by adenosine, IPC effluent contains additional factor(s) contributing to modulation of the mitochondrial response to ischemia/reperfusion injury.
Authors: A Phillip Owens; Nathan Robbins; Keith Saum; Shannon M Jones; Akiva Kirschner; Jessica G Woo; Connie McCoy; Samuel Slone; Marc E Rothenberg; Elaine M Urbina; Michael Tranter; Jack Rubinstein Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Andrew Hale; Changjin Lee; Sofia Annis; Pil-Ki Min; Reena Pande; Mark A Creager; Colleen G Julian; Lorna G Moore; S Alex Mitsialis; Sarah J Hwang; Stella Kourembanas; Stephen Y Chan Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2014-06-28
Authors: Gerd Heusch; Hans Erik Bøtker; Karin Przyklenk; Andrew Redington; Derek Yellon Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jonathan Florentin; Yi-Yin Tai; Thomas Bertero; Partha Dutta; Stephen Y Chan; Jingsi Zhao; Stéphanie Torrino; Lee Ohayon; Tomasz Brzoska; Ying Tang; Jimin Yang; Vinny Negi; Chen-Shan Chen Woodcock; Michael G Risbano; Seyed Mehdi Nouraie; Prithu Sundd Journal: Circ Res Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Gal Yaniv; Arik Eisenkraft; Lilach Gavish; Linn Wagnert-Avraham; Dean Nachman; Jacob Megreli; Gil Shimon; Daniel Rimbrot; Ben Simon; Asaf Berman; Matan Cohen; David Kushnir; Ruth Shaylor; Baruch Batzofin; Shimon Firman; Amir Shlaifer; Michael Hartal; Yuval Heled; Elon Glassberg; Yitshak Kreiss; S David Gertz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 4.379