Henry T Stelfox1, Sharon E Straus. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Teaching Research & Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4Z6; Department of Medicine, Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Teaching Research & Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4Z6; Department of Community Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Teaching Research & Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4Z6. Electronic address: tstelfox@ucalgary.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this article, we describe one approach for developing and evaluating quality indicators. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We focus on describing different conceptual approaches to quality indicator development, review one approach for developing quality indicators, outline how to evaluate quality indicators once developed, and discuss quality indicator maintenance. RESULTS: The key steps for developing quality indicators include specifying a clear goal for the indicators; using methodologies to incorporate evidence, expertise, and patient perspectives; and considering contextual factors and logistics of implementation. The Strategic Framework Board and the National Quality Measure Clearinghouse have developed criteria for evaluating quality indicators that complement traditional psychometric evaluations. Optimal strategies for quality indicator maintenance and dissemination have not been determined, but experiences with clinical guideline maintenance may be informative. CONCLUSION: For quality indicators to effectively guide quality improvement efforts, they must be developed, evaluated, maintained, and implemented using rigorous evidence-informed practices.
OBJECTIVE: In this article, we describe one approach for developing and evaluating quality indicators. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We focus on describing different conceptual approaches to quality indicator development, review one approach for developing quality indicators, outline how to evaluate quality indicators once developed, and discuss quality indicator maintenance. RESULTS: The key steps for developing quality indicators include specifying a clear goal for the indicators; using methodologies to incorporate evidence, expertise, and patient perspectives; and considering contextual factors and logistics of implementation. The Strategic Framework Board and the National Quality Measure Clearinghouse have developed criteria for evaluating quality indicators that complement traditional psychometric evaluations. Optimal strategies for quality indicator maintenance and dissemination have not been determined, but experiences with clinical guideline maintenance may be informative. CONCLUSION: For quality indicators to effectively guide quality improvement efforts, they must be developed, evaluated, maintained, and implemented using rigorous evidence-informed practices.
Authors: Jane K O'Hara; Katja Grasic; Nils Gutacker; Andrew Street; Robbie Foy; Carl Thompson; John Wright; Rebecca Lawton Journal: J R Soc Med Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Kristen B Pitzul; Sarah E P Munce; Laure Perrier; Lauren Beaupre; Suzanne N Morin; Rhona McGlasson; Susan B Jaglal Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Bruno Rushforth; Tim Stokes; Elizabeth Andrews; Thomas A Willis; Rosemary McEachan; Simon Faulkner; Robbie Foy Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: S Abolfazi Soltani; Armann Ingolfsson; David A Zygun; Henry T Stelfox; Lisa Hartling; Robin Featherstone; Dawn Opgenorth; Sean M Bagshaw Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2015-11-12