Literature DB >> 24016546

Comparison of catheter ablation and surgical ablation in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and rheumatic heart disease: a four-year follow-up study.

Jun Gu1, Xu Liu, Wei-feng Jiang, Feng Li, Liang Zhao, Li Zhou, Yuan-long Wang, Yu-gang Liu, Xiao-dong Zhang, Shao-hui Wu, Kai Xu, Dao-liang Zhang, Jia-ning Gu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In our previous prospective and randomized study, we have demonstrated that the concomitant surgical ablation using saline-irrigated cooled tip radiofrequency ablation (SICTRA) system is more effective than subsequent circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) combined with substrate modification in treating patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LS-AF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) undergoing cardiac surgery during middle-term follow-up. Whether this strategy also decreases longer-term arrhythmia recurrence is unknown. This study describes the 4-year efficacy of SICTRA for these patients. Furthermore, we seek to compare the electrophysiological characteristics for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) at the session of catheter ablation between two groups.
METHODS: Long-term follow-up was performed in 95 patients who underwent the catheter ablation strategy (n=47, Group A) or SICTRA (n=48, Group B) combined with valvular surgery for symptomatic LS-AF patients with RHD.
RESULTS: After one procedure, Group B had a significantly higher freedom from ATa compared with Group A (29/48 vs 15/47, P=0.005) after a mean follow-up of 54 months (range 48 to 63 months). Catheter-based mapping and ablation of recurrent ATa showed larger amounts of macro-reentrant atrial tachycardias (ATs) in Group B and higher incidence of pulmonary vein (PV) recovery in Group A. After multiple catheter ablations for recurrent ATa, sinus rhythm (SR) could be maintained equally between two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Single procedure success seems to be higher with SICTRA but repeated catheter ablation potentially results in comparable outcomes in treating patients with LS-AF and RHD during long-term follow-up. More macro-reentrant ATs and more PV recoveries are identified to be responsible for ATa in SICTRA and catheter ablation group, respectively.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Rheumatic heart disease; SICTRA

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24016546     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  2 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of surgical ablation versus catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Katherine Kearney; Rowan Stephenson; Kevin Phan; Wei Yen Chan; Min Yin Huang; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-01

2.  Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety Endpoints of Five Therapies for Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tongyu Wang; Tingting Fang; Zeyi Cheng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.