Literature DB >> 24016499

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: patient outcomes, rate of appropriate and inappropriate interventions, and complications.

Pieter A Vriesendorp1, Arend F L Schinkel, Johan Van Cleemput, Rik Willems, Luc J L M Jordaens, Dominic A M J Theuns, Marjon A van Slegtenhorst, Thomy J de Ravel, Folkert J ten Cate, Michelle Michels.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most devastating complication of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but this can be prevented by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The aim of this study is to evaluate HCM patients with ICDs for primary or secondary prevention of SCD.
METHODS: The study population consisted of all HCM patients with an ICD in 2 tertiary referral clinics. End points during follow-up were total and cardiac mortality, appropriate and inappropriate ICD intervention, and device-related complications. Cox-regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of outcome.
RESULTS: ICDs were implanted in 134 patients with HCM (mean age 44 ± 17 years, 34% women, 4.2 ± 4.8 years follow-up). Annualized cardiac mortality rate was 3.4% per year and associated with New York Heart Association class III or IV (HR 5.2 [2.0-14, P = .002]) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (HR 6.3 [2.1-20, P = .02]). Appropriate ICD interventions occurred in 38 patients (6.8%/year) and was associated with implantation for secondary prevention of SCD (HR 4.0 [1.8-9.1], P = .001) and male gender (HR 3.3 [1.2-9.0], P = .02). Inappropriate ICD intervention occurred in 21 patients (3.7%/year) and in 20 patients device related complications were documented (3.6%/year).
CONCLUSION: ICDs successfully abort life-threatening arrhythmias in HCM patients at increased risk of SCD with an annualized intervention rate of 6.8% per year. End-stage heart failure is the main cause of mortality in these patients. The annualized rate of inappropriate ICD intervention was 3.7% per year, whereas device-related complications occurred 3.6% per year.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24016499     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  21 in total

1.  Recommendations of the current guidelines for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Debate still exists.

Authors:  Arya Aminorroaya; Ali Vasheghani-Farahani; Farzad Masoudkabir; Pegah Roayaei
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Global longitudinal strain and left atrial volume index improve prediction of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients.

Authors:  Philippe Debonnaire; Joep Thijssen; Darryl P Leong; Emer Joyce; Spyridon Katsanos; Georgette E Hoogslag; Martin J Schalij; Douwe E Atsma; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado; Nina Ajmone Marsan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Enhanced American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Strategy for Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in High-Risk Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Martin S Maron; Ethan J Rowin; Benjamin S Wessler; Paula J Mooney; Amber Fatima; Parth Patel; Benjamin C Koethe; Mikhail Romashko; Mark S Link; Barry J Maron
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

4.  Prognostic significance of late gadolinium enhancement quantification in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with systolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Akira Funada; Hideaki Kanzaki; Teruo Noguchi; Yoshiaki Morita; Yasuo Sugano; Takahiro Ohara; Takuya Hasegawa; Hiromi Hashimura; Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda; Masafumi Kitakaze; Satoshi Yasuda; Hisao Ogawa; Toshihisa Anzai
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Genetics, Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Therapy.

Authors:  Ali J Marian; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 6.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Nelson Wang; Ashleigh Xie; Richard Tjahjono; David H Tian; Steven Phan; Tristan D Yan; Pietro Bajona; Kevin Phan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-07

7.  Clinical outcomes and programming strategies of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices in paediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a UK National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Gabrielle Norrish; Henry Chubb; Ella Field; Karen McLeod; Maria Ilina; Georgia Spentzou; Jan Till; Piers E F Daubeney; Alan Graham Stuart; Jane Matthews; Dominic Hares; Elspeth Brown; Katie Linter; Vinay Bhole; Krishnakumar Pillai; Michael Bowes; Caroline B Jones; Orhan Uzun; Amos Wong; Arthur Yue; Shankar Sadagopan; Tara Bharucha; Norah Yap; Eric Rosenthal; Sujeev Mathur; Satish Adwani; Zdenka Reinhardt; Jasveer Mangat; Juan Pablo Kaski
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 8.  Risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  S Marrakchi; I Kammoun; E Bennour; L Laroussi; S Kachboura
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Utility of electrophysiological studies to predict arrhythmic events.

Authors:  Gabriela Hilfiker; Andreas W Schoenenberger; Paul Erne; Richard Kobza
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-26

10.  ICD Therapy for Primary Prevention in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Amar Trivedi; Bradley P Knight
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.