Literature DB >> 24014828

Impact of ejection fraction on the clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure.

Cecilia Linde1, Claude Daubert, William T Abraham, Martin St John Sutton, Stefano Ghio, Christian Hassager, John M Herre, Tracy L Bergemann, Michael R Gold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in mild heart failure (HF) patients with QRS prolongation and ejection fraction (EF) ≤30%. To assess the effect of CRT in less severe systolic dysfunction, outcomes in the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study were evaluated in which patients with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) >30% were included. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The results of patients with baseline EF >30% (n=177) and those with EF ≤30% (n=431), as determined by a blinded core laboratory, were compared. In the LVEF >30% subgroup, there was a trend for improvement in the clinical composite response with CRT ON versus CRT OFF (P=0.06) and significant reductions in LV end systolic volume index (-6.7 ± 21.1 versus 2.1 ± 17.6 mL/m(2); P=0.01) and LV mass (-20.6 ± 50.5 versus 5.0 ± 42.4 g; P=0.04) after 12 months. The time to death or first HF hospitalization was significantly prolonged with CRT (hazard ratio, 0.26; P=0.012). In the LVEF <30% subgroup, significant improvements in clinical composite response (P=0.02), reverse remodeling parameters, and time to death or first HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.58; P=0.047) were observed. After adjusting for important covariates, the CRT ON assignment remained independently associated with improved time to death or first HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.54; P=0.035), whereas there was no significant interaction with LVEF.
CONCLUSIONS: Among subjects with mild HF, QRS prolongation, and LVEF >30%, CRT produced reverse remodeling and similar clinical benefit compared with subjects with more severe LV systolic dysfunction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00271154.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure; mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24014828     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  11 in total

1.  Six months clinical outcome comparison between quadripolar and bipolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A prospective, non-randomized, single-centre observational study.

Authors:  Ajay Raj; Ajay Pratap Singh; Ranjit Kumar Nath; Neeraj Pandit; Puneet Aggarwal; Ashok Kumar Thakur; Rajeev Bharadwaj; Vinod Kumar
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-02-23

2.  Defining the real-world reproducibility of visual grading of left ventricular function and visual estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction: impact of image quality, experience and accreditation.

Authors:  Graham D Cole; Niti M Dhutia; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Keith Willson; James Harrison; Claire E Raphael; Massoud Zolgharni; Jamil Mayet; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Echocardiographic Predictors of Worse Outcome After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Eduardo Arrais Rocha; Francisca Tatiana Moreira Pereira; José Sebastião Abreu; José Wellington O Lima; Marcelo de Paula M Monteiro; Almino Cavalcante Rocha Neto; Ana Rosa Pinto Quidute; Camilla Viana A Goés; Carlos Roberto Martins Rodrigues Sobrinho; Maurício Ibrahim Scanavacca
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Recapitulation of dyssynchrony-associated contractile impairment in asymmetrically paced engineered heart tissue.

Authors:  Justus Stenzig; Marc D Lemoine; Aaltje M S Stoter; Kinga M Wrona; Marta Lemme; Wesam Mulla; Yoram Etzion; Thomas Eschenhagen; Marc N Hirt
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 5.000

5.  Clinical Outcomes of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction >35 vs. ≤35.

Authors:  Zhixin Jiang; Tian Wu; Yixian Wu; Zenghong Chen; Wen Yang; Chongchong Chen; Xiujuan Zhou; Qijun Shan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-17

6.  Development and Validation of Predictive Models of Cardiac Mortality and Transplantation in Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Eduardo Arrais Rocha; Francisca Tatiana Moreira Pereira; José Sebastião Abreu; José Wellington O Lima; Marcelo de Paula Martins Monteiro; Almino Cavalcante Rocha Neto; Camilla Viana Arrais Goés; Ana Gardênia P Farias; Carlos Roberto Martins Rodrigues Sobrinho; Ana Rosa Pinto Quidute; Maurício Ibrahim Scanavacca
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  What is the lowest value of left ventricular baseline ejection fraction that predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Authors:  Aysen Agacdiken Agir; Umut Celikyurt; Tayfun Sahin; Irem Yılmaz; Kurtulus Karauzum; Serdar Bozyel; Dilek Ural; Ahmet Vural
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-09-14

8.  Long-Term Effects of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors on Myocardial Function in Chronic Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Gregor Poglajen; Ajda Anžič-Drofenik; Gregor Zemljič; Sabina Frljak; Andraž Cerar; Renata Okrajšek; Miran Šebeštjen; Bojan Vrtovec
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-28

9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and moderately reduced ejection fraction: Could it trigger a super-response?

Authors:  Mazen Tawfik Ghanem; Lamyaa Elsayed Allam; Rania Samir Ahmed
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2019-05-03

10.  Prognostic effects of longitudinal changes in left ventricular ejection fraction with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Nixiao Zhang; Minsi Cai; Wei Hua; Yiran Hu; Hongxia Niu; Chi Cai; Min Gu; Shu Zhang
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.