Literature DB >> 24013484

Does the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life differ based on age?

Hema D Brazell1, David M O'Sullivan, Christine A Lasala.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the impact of urinary incontinence (UI) on quality of life (QOL) differs between women based on age.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients presenting for the management of UI was performed. Patients with UI and their corresponding degree of bother were identified by their responses to validated questionnaires. Distributions of comorbidities and types of UI were presented as frequencies and compared between age cohorts with a chi-square test. Mean scale scores were assessed for normality and a one-way analysis of variance with a post hoc Scheffé's test was used to compare the scores.
RESULTS: Of 765 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 22.4 % were <45, 28.9 % were 45-55, and 48.8 % were >55 years of age. Women older than 55 were significantly more likely to have urge UI and mixed UI than their counterparts (p < 0.001). Women <45 and 45-55 were more negatively impacted in their ability to perform physical activities compared to women >55 (p = 0.004), whereas women >55 were significantly less likely to feel frustrated by their incontinence than women <45 (p = 0.022). However, there was no significant difference in overall impact of incontinence among groups (p = 0.585).
CONCLUSIONS: UI equally impacts the functional and psychological QOL in women regardless of age. UI in women <55 results in a greater negative impact on level of physical activity, whereas women <45 are significantly more frustrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24013484     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-2005-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  15 in total

1.  Reproducibility and validity of simple questions to identify urinary incontinence in elderly women.

Authors:  Gitte Rohr; Kaare Christensen; Kirsten Ulstrup; Jakob Kragstrup
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  M D Barber; M N Kuchibhatla; C F Pieper; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Quality-of-life impact and treatment of urinary incontinence in ethnically diverse older women.

Authors:  Alison J Huang; Jeanette S Brown; Alka M Kanaya; Jennifer M Creasman; Arona I Ragins; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; David H Thom
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-10-09

4.  The impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life of the elderly.

Authors:  Yu Ko; Swu-Jane Lin; J Warren Salmon; Morgan S Bron
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Economic costs of urinary incontinence in 1995.

Authors:  T H Wagner; T W Hu
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7).

Authors:  M D Barber; M D Walters; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Dirk de Ridder; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Bary Berghmans; Joseph Lee; Ash Monga; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Difference in quality of life in women with urge urinary incontinence compared to women with stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Megan O Schimpf; Minita Patel; David M O'Sullivan; Paul K Tulikangas
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-28

9.  Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL)

Authors:  D L Patrick; M L Martin; D M Bushnell; I Yalcin; T H Wagner; D P Buesching
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group.

Authors:  J S Uebersax; J F Wyman; S A Shumaker; D K McClish; J A Fantl
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.696

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Managing Urinary Incontinence in Patients with Dementia: Pharmacological Treatment Options and Considerations.

Authors:  Susie Orme; Vikky Morris; William Gibson; Adrian Wagg
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Female urinary incontinence and sexuality.

Authors:  Renato Lains Mota
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.