Literature DB >> 24013394

Implant-abutment connection designs for anterior crowns: reliability and failure modes.

Lucas S Machado1, Estevam A Bonfante, Rodolfo B Anchieta, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Paulo G Coelho.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of implant-abutment connection types on reliability and failure modes of anterior single-unit crowns.
METHODS: Fifty-four implants were divided in 3 groups (n = 18 each): external hexagon (EH), internal hexagon (IH), and Morse taper (MT) connection. Abutments were screwed to the implants, and maxillary central incisor metal crowns were cemented and subjected to step-stress accelerated life testing.
RESULTS: The beta values derived from use-level probability Weibull calculations for groups IH (2.52), EH (1.67), and MT (0.88) indicated that fatigue influenced the failure only of IH and EH groups. The reliability for a mission of 100,000 cycles at 175 N was 0.99 (0.98-1.00), 0.84 (0.62-0.94) and 0.97 (0.87-0.99) for the EH, IH, and MT, respectively. The characteristic strength was not significantly different between EH (290 N) and IH (251 N) but significantly higher for MT (357 N). For IH and EH groups, failure involved screw fracture, and the MT implants primary failure mode was abutment fracture.
CONCLUSIONS: Reliability was higher for the EH and MT relative to IH groups, whereas the characteristic strength was significantly higher for implants with MT connection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24013394     DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829f1f2d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  5 in total

Review 1.  Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; Liliane da Rocha Bonatto; Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-25

2.  A Comparative Analysis of Implants Presenting Different Diameters: Extra-Narrow, Narrow and Conventional.

Authors:  Henrique Tuzzolo Neto; Alessandra Sayuri Tuzita; Sérgio Alexandre Gehrke; Renata de Vasconcellos Moura; Márcio Zaffalon Casati; Alfredo Mikail Melo Mesquita
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Influence of Connection Type and Platform Diameter on Titanium Dental Implants Fatigue: Non-Axial Loading Cyclic Test Analysis.

Authors:  Ana I Nicolas-Silvente; Eugenio Velasco-Ortega; Ivan Ortiz-Garcia; Alvaro Jimenez-Guerra; Loreto Monsalve-Guil; Raul Ayuso-Montero; Javier Gil; Jose Lopez-Lopez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Comparative evaluation of peri-implant tissues in patients wearing mandibular overdenture with different implant platforms.

Authors:  Laércio Almeida de Melo; Danielle Bezerra de Farias; Annie Karoline Bezerra de Medeiros; Gustavo Augusto Seabra Barbosa; Euler Maciel Dantas; Adriana da Fonte Porto Carreiro
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

5.  Failure Modes and Survival of Anterior Crowns Supported by Narrow Implant Systems.

Authors:  Edmara T P Bergamo; Everardo N S de Araújo-Júnior; Adolfo C O Lopes; Paulo G Coelho; Abbas Zahoui; Ernesto B Benalcázar Jalkh; Estevam A Bonfante
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.