| Literature DB >> 24012706 |
Benoît Schilter1, Romualdo Benigni2, Alan Boobis3, Alessandro Chiodini4, Andrew Cockburn5, Mark T D Cronin6, Elena Lo Piparo1, Sandeep Modi7, Anette Thiel8, Andrew Worth9.
Abstract
There is demand for methodologies to establish levels of safety concern associated with dietary exposures to chemicals for which no toxicological data are available. In such situations, the application of in silico methods appears promising. To make safety statement requires quantitative predictions of toxicological reference points such as no observed adverse effect level and carcinogenic potency for DNA-reacting chemicals. A decision tree (DT) has been developed to aid integrating exposure information and predicted toxicological reference points obtained with quantitative structure activity relationship ((Q)SAR) software and read across techniques. The predicted toxicological values are compared with exposure to obtain margins of exposure (MoE). The size of the MoE defines the level of safety concern and should account for a number of uncertainties such as the classical interspecies and inter-individual variability as well as others determined on a case by case basis. An analysis of the uncertainties of in silico approaches together with results from case studies suggest that establishing safety concern based on application of the DT is unlikely to be significantly more uncertain than based on experimental data. The DT makes a full use of all data available, ensuring an adequate degree of conservatism. It can be used when fast decision making is required.Entities:
Keywords: (Q)SAR; Chemical grouping; Food; In silico toxicology; Incident management; Predictive toxicology; Read across; Risk assessment; Uncertainties
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24012706 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.08.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ISSN: 0273-2300 Impact factor: 3.271