Literature DB >> 24012104

Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects: results in patients with large and extreme defects.

Giovanni Romanelli1, Richard W Harper2, Philip M Mottram1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter closure of moderate sized atrial septal defects (ASD) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective. However, the feasibility of transcatheter closure of very large defects is less clear, particularly when an aortic rim of septal tissue is absent.
METHODS: The study included patients referred for transcatheter ASD closure with maximal ASD diameter ≥ 20 mm at pre-procedural transoesophageal echocardiography. Patients were grouped according to presence of moderately large (20-29 mm), very large (30-39 mm), or extremely large (≥ 40 mm) ASD size. Procedural success was defined by successful device deployment and absence of complications.
RESULTS: Forty-two patients (median age 40 years, range 12-85 years, 76% female) were included in the study. The mean maximal ASD diameter was 29.0 ± 7.4mm. Twenty-three patients had moderately large ASDs (23.0 ± 2.8mm); 13 had very large ASDs (33.1 ± 2.9 mm) and six had extremely large ASDs (41.3 ± 1.6 mm). The aortic rim was absent in 22 patients, and present in 20 patients (4.7 ± 2.9 mm). Transcatheter defect closure was successful in 36 of 42 patients (86%). Procedural success was 100% in the moderately large ASD group, 92% in the very large group but only 17% (one out of six) in the extremely large group. If patients with ASD ≥ 40 mm were excluded (n = 6), the overall success rate was 97%. A single complication (device dislodgement) occurred in a patient with a 42 mm defect and a deficient postero-inferior rim. The presence or absence of an aortic rim of septum did not influence procedural success.
CONCLUSION: The vast majority (97%) of large ASDs in the range 20-39 mm can be successfully closed percutaneously with a low or zero complication rate. However, procedural success is poor when attempting closure of extreme defects (≥ 40 mm), regardless of whether an aortic rim of septal tissue or present or absent.
Copyright © 2013 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial septal defect; Congenital heart disease; Percutaneous intervention; Structural heart disease; Transcatheter closure

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24012104     DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2013.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung Circ        ISSN: 1443-9506            Impact factor:   2.975


  4 in total

1.  Should transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects with inferior-posterior deficient rim still be attempted?

Authors:  Pascal Amedro; Selin Bayburt; Anass Assaidi; Bernard Kreitmann; Gilbert Habib; Virginie Fouilloux; Alain Fraisse
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Comparative study of the transcatheter and transthoracic device closure treatments for atrial septal defect: A Chinese single-institution experience.

Authors:  Qiang Chen; Hua Cao; Zhao-Yang Chen; Gui-Can Zhang; Liang-Wan Chen; Fan Xu; Jia-Jun He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Catheter-based closure of a large atrial septal defect with inferior rim deficiency using pulmonary vein slide-out assisted implantation technique: a case report.

Authors:  Salvatore Evola; Oreste Fabio Triolo; Giuseppina Novo; Eustaquio Maria Onorato
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-08

4.  Midterm Prognosis of Sexagenary Patients after Transcatheter Device Closure of Atrial Septal Defects: a Single-Chinese Center Experience.

Authors:  Kai-Peng Sun; Ning Xu; Shu-Ting Huang; Hua Cao; Qiang Chen
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-03-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.