Literature DB >> 24011474

Effect of collection material and sample processing on pig oral fluid testing results.

Chris Olsen1, Locke Karriker, Chong Wang, Basavaraj Binjawadagi, Gourapura Renukaradhya, Apisit Kittawornrat, Sergio Lizano, Johann Coetzee, Rodger Main, Allison Meiszberg, Yaowalak Panyasing, Jeffrey Zimmerman.   

Abstract

The effect of sampling material, sample processing, and collection order on the detection of analytes in pig oral fluid specimens was evaluated. Oral fluid samples were collected from 104 pens of commercial wean-to-finish pigs using ropes made of three different materials. Processed (centrifuged and filtered) and unprocessed oral fluid samples were tested using commercial ELISAs for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) antibodies and total IgM, IgA, and IgG. Unprocessed samples were tested for PRRSV nucleic acid and processed samples were assayed for PRRSV neutralizing antibodies. Analysis of the data using repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer adjusted t tests found statistically significant, non-uniform, and assay-dependent effects of all three factors. Therefore, when testing oral fluid specimens, swine health specialists, veterinarians, and diagnosticians should be aware of the potential impact of these factors on specific analytes. For monitoring health and welfare parameters, oral fluid samples should be collected using cotton-based materials and undergo minimal post-collection processing.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostics; Immunoglobulin; Oral fluid; Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus; Surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24011474     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  9 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive strategies for surveillance of swine viral diseases: a review.

Authors:  Hanna Turlewicz-Podbielska; Jan Włodarek; Małgorzata Pomorska-Mól
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.279

2.  Field application of a commercial porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) oral fluid antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Authors:  Emily Croft; Tim Blackwell; Jeff Zimmerman
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Evaluation of the specificity of a commercial ELISA for detection of antibodies against porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus in individual oral fluid of pigs collected in two different ways.

Authors:  Tatjana Sattler; Eveline Wodak; Friedrich Schmoll
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Detection and Isolation of Swine Influenza A Virus in Spiked Oral Fluid and Samples from Individually Housed, Experimentally Infected Pigs: Potential Role of Porcine Oral Fluid in Active Influenza A Virus Surveillance in Swine.

Authors:  Inge Decorte; Mieke Steensels; Bénédicte Lambrecht; Ann Brigitte Cay; Nick De Regge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of PRRSV Nucleic Acid and Antibody Detection in Pen-Based Oral Fluid and Individual Serum Samples in Three Different Age Categories of Post-Weaning Pigs from Endemically Infected Farms.

Authors:  Nick De Regge; Brigitte Cay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The use of oral fluids to monitor key pathogens in porcine respiratory disease complex.

Authors:  Juan Hernandez-Garcia; Nardy Robben; Damien Magnée; Thomas Eley; Ian Dennis; Sara M Kayes; Jill R Thomson; Alexander W Tucker
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2017-04-05

7.  Survey of porcine respiratory disease complex-associated pathogens among commercial pig farms in Korea via oral fluid method.

Authors:  Yeotaek Cheong; Changin Oh; Kunkyu Lee; Ki-Hyun Cho
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 1.672

8.  Monitoring PRRSV-1 in suckling piglets in an endemic herd using reverse transcriptase quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction: comparison of the rate of detection in serum and oral fluid samples and evaluation of pooling.

Authors:  Arnaud Lebret; Gwenaël Boulbria; Pauline Berton; Pierre-Yves Moalic; Jean Le Guennec; Franck Bouchet; Vincent Auvigne; Valérie Normand
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2019-02-19

9.  Detection of total and PRRSV-specific antibodies in oral fluids collected with different rope types from PRRSV-vaccinated and experimentally infected pigs.

Authors:  Inge Decorte; Wander Van Breedam; Yves Van der Stede; Hans J Nauwynck; Nick De Regge; Ann Brigitte Cay
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.741

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.