BACKGROUND: Although chronic pain is a source of work-related disability, relatively little research has addressed the psychological factors that differentiate individuals in chronic pain who leave the workforce from those who remain on the job despite their pain. OBJECTIVE: The present study examined a small set of attitudinal and coping-related factors as potential correlates of pain-related disability vs continued part- or full-time employment over and above the role of well-known risk factors. METHODS: A large sample of adult men and women with chronic pain drawn from across the United States (N = 1,293) by means of random digit dialing was subdivided into two groups: working (N = 859) and on disability (N = 434). Both groups were interviewed (by telephone) to complete a set of instruments (called the Profile of Chronic Pain: Extended Assessment battery) measuring pain attitudes and coping methods. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis revealed that continued employment status was inversely related to pain severity and was positively related to higher education and being Hispanic. After controlling for severity and demographic factors, belief in a medical cure and catastrophizing tendencies were significant inverse predictors, and task persistence was a positive predictor of continued employment. CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed both demographic and attitudinal predictors of continued employment and highlight the value of harnessing insights from the psychology of work engagement to better understand the processes underlying pain presenteeism. Interventions designed to keep persons with pain in the active work force should build upon and extend the present findings. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Although chronic pain is a source of work-related disability, relatively little research has addressed the psychological factors that differentiate individuals in chronic pain who leave the workforce from those who remain on the job despite their pain. OBJECTIVE: The present study examined a small set of attitudinal and coping-related factors as potential correlates of pain-related disability vs continued part- or full-time employment over and above the role of well-known risk factors. METHODS: A large sample of adult men and women with chronic pain drawn from across the United States (N = 1,293) by means of random digit dialing was subdivided into two groups: working (N = 859) and on disability (N = 434). Both groups were interviewed (by telephone) to complete a set of instruments (called the Profile of Chronic Pain: Extended Assessment battery) measuring pain attitudes and coping methods. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis revealed that continued employment status was inversely related to pain severity and was positively related to higher education and being Hispanic. After controlling for severity and demographic factors, belief in a medical cure and catastrophizing tendencies were significant inverse predictors, and task persistence was a positive predictor of continued employment. CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed both demographic and attitudinal predictors of continued employment and highlight the value of harnessing insights from the psychology of work engagement to better understand the processes underlying pain presenteeism. Interventions designed to keep persons with pain in the active work force should build upon and extend the present findings. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chronic Pain and Disability; Coping; Pain Presenteeism; Work Motivation
Authors: Barbara J Turner; Yuanyuan Liang; Natalia Rodriguez; Melissa A Valerio; Andrea Rochat; Jennifer S Potter; Paula Winkler Journal: J Pain Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Mariska de Wit; Haije Wind; Carel T J Hulshof; Monique H W Frings-Dresen Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Anna Cabak; Anna Dąbrowska-Zimakowska; Aleksandra Truszczyńska; Patryk Rogala; Katarzyna Laprus; Wiesław Tomaszewski Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2015-12-15
Authors: Tea Lallukka; Minna Mänty; Cyrus Cooper; Maria Fleischmann; Anne Kouvonen; Karen E Walker-Bone; Jenny A Head; Jaana I Halonen Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Juliana Nga Man Lui; Ellie Bostwick Andres; Janice Mary Johnston Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 3.390