| Literature DB >> 24009873 |
Yihunie Ayele1, Jung-Ah Kim, Eunhee Park, Ye-Jung Kim, Negussie Retta, Gulelat Dessie, Sang-Ki Rhee, Kwangoh Koh, Kung-Woo Nam, Hee Seon Kim.
Abstract
This study examined the total polyphenol content of eight wild edible plants from Ethiopia and their effect on NO production in Raw264.7 cells. Owing to its relatively high polyphenol concentration and inhibition of NO production, the methanol extract of Adansonia digitata L. leaf (MEAD) was subjected to detailed evaluation of its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Antioxidant effects were assessed by measuring free-radical-scavenging activity using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and oxygen-radical-absorbance capacity (ORAC) assays, while anti-inflammatory effects were assessed by measuring inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. In the ORAC assay, MEAD was 10.2 times more potent than vitamin C at eliminating peroxyl radicals. In DPPH assay, MEAD also showed a strong ROS scavenging effect. MEAD significantly inhibited iNOS activity (IC50=28.6 μg/ml) of LPS-stimulated Raw264.7 cells. We also investigated the relationship between iNOS expression and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) activation. MEAD inhibited IκBα degradation and NF-κB translocation from the cytosol to the nucleus in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells without significant cytotoxic effects, as confirmed by MTT assay. These results suggest that MEAD inhibits anti-inflammatory iNOS expression, which might be related to the elimination of peroxyl radicals and thus the inhibition of IκBα-mediated NF-κB signal transduction.Entities:
Keywords: Adansonia digitata; Anti-inflammatory; Antioxidant; IκB; NF-κB; iNOS
Year: 2013 PMID: 24009873 PMCID: PMC3762316 DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2012.098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomol Ther (Seoul) ISSN: 1976-9148 Impact factor: 4.634
Fig. 1.(A) HPLC chromatogram of MEAD. (B) The relative constituents of MEAD and the major compounds, epicatechin (19.8%) and procyanidin B2 (11.9%)
The yield, effect on iNOS activity in Raw264.7 cells, total polyphenol content, and cytotoxicity of methanol extracts of various parts of eight food plants
| Scientific name/family name | Part | MeOH (Yield, %) | Polyphenol equal to tannic acid (μg) | iNOS activity IC50* (μg/ml) | MTT assay CC50** (μg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | 12.4 | 990.5 | 28.6 | >100 | |
| Seed | 4.4 | 71.4 | >100 | >100 | |
| Fruit | 59.8 | 516.2 | >100 | >100 | |
| Pulp | 38 | 249.8 | >100 | >100 | |
| Pulp | 58.2 | 14.3 | >100 | >100 | |
| Leaf | 22.7 | 670.5 | >100 | >100 | |
| Leaf | 14.4 | 737.1 | >100 | >100 | |
| Leaf | 17.5 | 301.0 | >100 | >100 | |
*IC50: 50% Inhibition Concentration; **CC50: 50% cytotoxic concentration.
Fig. 2.Scavenging effect of MEAD on free radicals. (A) ORAC assay showing the APPH-induced fluorescence decay curve in the presence of MEAD or vitamin C at various concentrations (■, □=6.25 μg/ml; ▼, ▽=12.5 μg/ml; ▲, △=25 υg/ml; ●, ○=50 υg/ml). Plots are representatives of three separate experiments. Insert presents best-fit lines between net AUC and different concentrations of MEAD or vitamin C. The Net AUC=AUCsample - AUCblank. The linear coefficients (r2) for MEAD and vitamin C are 0.992 and 0.993, respectively. Data represent mean ± S.D., n=3. (B) DPPH reduction assay. Each bar represents mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
Fig. 3.Inhibitory effect of MEAD against iNOS expression. (A) Western blot analysis of iNOS expression in Raw264.7 cell lysates. (B) Application of various MEAD concentrations (μg/ml) resulted in dose-dependent inhibition of iNOS activity in culture medium of LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells. (C) MTT assay of MEAD. Results as shown as mean ± S.D., n=3. **p<0.001 and *p<0.01 compared with the LPS-induced group.
Fig. 5.Dose-dependent effects of MEAD on the translocation of NF-κB (p65) in Raw264.7 cells. (A) Time-dependent translocation of NF-κB was assessed by confocal microscopy. Cytoplasmic NF-κB (p65) protein was completely translocated from the cytosol to the nucleus within 30 min, and this maintained for 120 min after incubation with LPS. (B) Cells were pre-incubated with MEAD for 2 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/ml) for 30 min. MEAD dose dependently inhibited NF-κB translocation in LPS-induced Raw264.7 cells. All experiments were repeated at least three times. (C) MEAD attenuates IκBα degradation 30 min after LPS treatment of Raw264.7 cells. IκBα was stained with rabbit anti-IκBα antibody, and then goat Alexa488-conjugated 2nd antibody. The degradation of of IκBα was evaluated by confocal microscopy. Pretreatment with MEAD dose-dependently inhibited the degradation of IκBα in LPS-induced Raw264.7 cells. Confocal microscope (400× magnification).
Fig. 4.Effects of MEAD on the activation of NF-κB in LPS-stimulated Raw264.7 cells. (A) Western blot analysis of NF-κB from the nuclei of Raw264.7 cells stimulated with LPS for 30 min. LPS dramatically increased the amount of NF-κB in the nucleus, and this amount was dose-dependently decreased by MEAD. (B) Western blot analysis of IκBα from the cytosolic extracts. The degradation of cytosolic IκBα upon LPS stimulation was suppressed by MEAD, in a dose-dependent manner. Cytosolic extracts of the same cells were used as a control (β-actin). All experiments were repeated at least three times. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, compared with the LPS-induced group.