Literature DB >> 24009844

Diphlorethohydroxycarmalol, Isolated from Ishige okamurae, Increases Prostaglandin E2 through the Expression of Cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in HaCaT Human Keratinocytes.

Gyeoung-Jin Kang1, Sang-Chul Han, Young-Sang Koh, Hee-Kyoung Kang, You-Jin Jeon, Eun-Sook Yoo.   

Abstract

Prostaglandin (PG) E2, the most abundant prostaglandin in the human body, is synthesized from arachidonic acid via the actions of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes. PGE2 exerts homeostatic, cytoprotective, inflammatory, and in some cases anti-inflammatory effects. Also, it has been reported that PGE2 is involved in hair growth. Diphlorethohydroxycarmalol (DPHC) is a phlorotannin compound isolated from the brown algae Ishige okamurae, with various biological activities in vitro and in vivo. In this study, the biological effect and mechanism of action of DPHC on prostaglandin synthesis in HaCaT human keratinocytes was examined. The results showed that, in these cells, DPHC significantly and dose-dependently induced PGE2 synthesis by increasing the protein and mRNA levels of COX-1 and COX-2. Interestingly, DPHC-induced COX-1 expression preceded that of COX-2. Also, while both rofecoxib and indomethacin inhibited PGE2 production, the latter was seems to be the more potent. From above results, we can expect that DPHC has some beneficial effects via increasing of PGE2 production.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cyclooxygenases; Diphlorethohydroxycarmalol; HaCaT keratinocytes; Prostaglandin E2

Year:  2012        PMID: 24009844      PMCID: PMC3762294          DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2012.20.6.520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomol Ther (Seoul)        ISSN: 1976-9148            Impact factor:   4.634


INTRODUCTION

Prostaglandins (PGs) are members of the eicosanoid family and are well-known to have various normal and pathophysiological responses, such as vessel contraction/relaxation, renal filtration, angiogenesis, increased proliferation, and immune suppression (Harris ; Flower, 2006). PGE2 is the most abundant PG in the human body and synthesized from arachidonic acid via the actions of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes. PGE2 exerts homeostatic, cytoprotective effects, inflammatory, and in some cases anti-inflammatory effects (Giuliano and Warner, 2002; Ricciotti and FitzGerald, 2011). COX enzymes comprise two isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2. COX-1 is constitutively expressed and its physiological functions include roles in the maintenance of vascular flow, cell division, mucus and bicarbonate production, and several cellular “housekeeping activities.” Its counterpart, COX-2, is an inducible enzyme with specialized functions, including the setting of inflammation, fever, pain, and stress adaptation (Langenbach ; Tanabe and Tohnai, 2002). Recently, it has been reported that it is the relationship between hair regrowth and PGE2. In previous studies, PGE2 showed moderate growth stimulatory effects on early anagen hair follicles in mouse and PG analog, latanoprost, stimulated an eyelashes growth in human (Johnstone and Albert, 2002; Sasaki . Also, Hoggaat reported that PGE2 may stimulate the survival and proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells. In 1990’s, there are reports that minoxidil (MXD), used as a hair loss therapeutics, stimulated the activity of purified ovine prostaglandin G/H synthase (PGHS-1; COX-1) in vitro and increased the production of PGE2 in cultured human or rat dermal papilla cells, and mouse fibroblasts (Michelet ; Lachgar . Marine algae, such as Chlorophyta (green algae), Phaeophyta (brown algae), and Rhodophyta (red algae), produce a wide variety of structurally unique and biologically active secondary metabolites. These compounds have been the focus of recent intense interest due to their potential as bio-active ingredients in cosmetics and as therapeutic agents. Among the latter, alpha-kainic acid, domoic acid, and bryostatin-1, isolated from marine organisms, have been used as cytotoxic agents. Ishige okamurae, a member of the Ishigeaceae family, is an edible brown alga found along the coast of Jeju Island, Korea. It is the source of diphlorethohydroxycarmalol (DPHC), a biologically active phlorotannin. For example, DPHC was shown to alleviate postprandial hyperglycemia in diabetic mice (Heo and to protect cells from UV-B radiation-induced damage (Heo . In a recent report, DPHC inhibited melanogenesis and protected mice against radiation-induced cell damage (Ahn . In 2009, Kim et al. reported the anti-inflammatory properties of an ethanolic extract of I. okamurae whose activities included the inhibition of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB). Keratinocytes are most important in epidermis of skin and a hair follicle producing hair is occurred from the stratum basale of the epidermis and is located in the dermis. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated that a relative effect of DPHC on the production of PGE2 when compared with MXD and that a mechanism of action by examining the expression of COX-1 and COX-2 in human HaCaT keratinocytes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals and reagents

Fetal bovine serum (FBS) and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) were purchased from Invitrogen (Grand Island, NY, USA). COX-1, COX-2, PGDH, and the GAPDH primers for end-point PCR were obtained from Cosmo Gene Tech (Korea), and anti-COX-1 and anti-COX-2 from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). DyLight488-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibody was purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA). All other chemicals were of reagent grade.

DPHC isolation

Diphlorethohydroxycarmalol (DPHC) was isolated as previously described (Heo . Briefly, dried I. okamurae was extracted three times with 80% methanol and then filtered. The filtrate was suspended in distilled water and partitioned with ethyl acetate. The resulting fraction was subjected to silica gel and Sephadex-LH 20 column chromatography. DPHC was finally purified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and its structure (Fig. 1A) was confirmed by comparing the NMR spectral data with those in the existing literature.
Fig. 1.

Effect of DPHC on PGE2 production in HaCaT human keratinocytes. (A) Chemical structure of diphlorethohydroxycarmalol (DPHC). (B) Cells (2.0×105 cells/ml) were cultured for 18 hr and then treated with DPHC (12.5, 25, 50 μg/ml) for 24 hr. Cell viability was then determined in a WST assay. (C) Cells were cultured for 18 hr and then treated with minoxidil (MXD, 100 μM) and DPHC (12.5, 25, 50 μg/ml) for 24 hr. PGE2 levels were determined in an ELISA using the cell supernatants in triplicate samples. Error bars indicate ± S.D. *p<0.05, significant compared to the negative control.

Cell culture and cell viability

HaCaT human keratinocytes were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, streptomycin (100 μg/ml), and penicillin (100 U/ml) at 37℃ in a humidified CO2 incubator. Cell viability was determined by the WST-1[2-(4-Iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2, 4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium] assay. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates and treated as described in the Results for 24 hr. WST solution was then added to each well, followed by a further incubation for 2 hr. The absorbance of each well at 450 nm was then measured in a VersaMax ELISA microplate reader (Molecular Devices, CA, USA).

PGE2 analysis by ELISA

The concentration of PGE2 in the supernatant was measured with an ELISA kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells in 96-well plates were treated with DPHC or minoxidil for 24 hr. PGE2 standards or cell culture supernatants were then added to the appropriate wells together with a PGE2 alkaline phosphatase tracer. The samples were incubated for 2 hr at room temperature (RT) on an orbital shaker, washed, and then treated by the addition of para-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) to each well. The plates were further incubated for 1 hr at RT in the dark, after which the optical density of each well, determined at 405 nm, was measured using a VersaMax ELISA microplate reader.

Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was isolated from HaCaT cells using the TRI reagent (MRC) according to the manufacturer's instructions and stored at −70℃ until use. Reverse transcription was performed using a First-Standard cDNA synthesis kit (Promega). Total RNA (1 μg) was incubated with an oligo(dT)18 primer at 70℃ for 5 min and the reactions then cooled on ice for 5 min. After addition of the reverse-transcriptase premix, the reactions were incubated at 42℃ for 60 min and then terminated by incubation at 70℃ for 15 min. PCR was conducted using i-TaqTM DNA polymerase (iNtRON Biotechnology, Korea) with the appropriate sense and antisense primers for COX-1, COX-2, PGDH, and GAPDH. The primer sequences were as follows: COX-1: (F) 5’-AAG TAC CAG GTG CTG GAT GG-3’, (R) 5’-GCT GCA GGA AAT AGC CAC TC-3’ (319 bp); COX-2: (F) 5’-CCA CCC GCA GTA CAG AAA GT-3’, (R) 5’-CAG GAT ACA GCT CCA CAG CA-3’ (196 bp); PGDH: (F) 5’-GCT GACCAGCAA CAA CTG AG-3’, (R) 5’-GGG CAT GAG TCC TGC TAA AG-3’ (237 bp); and GAPDH : (F) 5’-GAG TCA ACG GAT TTG GTC GT-3’, (R) 5’-GAC AAG CTT CCC GTT CTC AG-3’ (185 bp). PCR was performed using a C1000 instrument (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and the following thermal cycling conditions: 94℃ for 30 sec, annealing at 55-60℃ for 30 sec, and extension at 72℃ for 2 min, repeated 30-35 times, followed by incubation at 72℃ for 10 min. The reaction products were visualized by electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose gel (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and UV light illumination after staining with ethidium bromide. Relative intensities were analyzed using the Image J program.

SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis

The incubated cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and then disrupted in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonident P-40, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM NaVO3, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 25 μg leupeptin/ml) on ice for 30 min. The resulting cell lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 min at 4℃; the supernatants were used for Western blotting. The total protein concentration of each sample was quantified by the Bio-Rad assay (Bio-Rad). Extracts containing 30 μg of protein were loaded alongside a pre-stained protein molecular mass ladder (Bio-Rad) on a NuPAGE 4-12% bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The proteins were electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane using an iBlot gel transfer device (Invitrogen). The membrane was blocked with blocking buffer (5% skim milk in TTBS buffer: Tween 20-Tris-buffered saline) for 1 hr at RT, followed by incubation with primary antibodies (1:1,000) overnight at 4℃. All antibodies were diluted in 1% BSA in TTBS buffer. The membrane was washed, incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-primary host IgG antibody (diluted 1:5,000) for 1 hr at RT, and then washed again. Immunoreactive bands were visualized with a Western blot detection system (iNtRON Biotechnology, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Confocal microscopy analysis

The cells were seeded onto coverslips in a 6-well plate, fixed with freshly prepared 3.5% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min. After 1 hr incubation with 3% BSA/0.1% Triton X-100/PBS, the cells were treated with primary anti-COX-1 (1:200) or anti-COX-2 (1:200) antibody overnight at 4℃. The cells were washed and then incubated with DyLight488-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:300) for 30 min at RT. After several additional washing steps, the coverslips were mounted in VECTASHIELD mounting media with DAPI (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA). The results were visualized using FV500 confocal microscopy (Olympus, Japan).

Statistical analysis

Student’s t-test and a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to determine the statistical significance of differences between experimental and control group values. Data represent the mean ± the standard deviation.

RESULTS

Effect of DPHC on the viability of HaCaT keratinocytes

To evaluate the effect of DPHC on cell viability, WST assays were performed. HaCaT keratinocytes were treated with DPHC at the concentrations indicated in Fig. 1B. As seen in the figure, concentrations below 50 μg DPHC/ml had no effect on cell viability in HaCaT keratinocytes.

Effect of DPHC on PGE2 production

MXD has been well known to produce PGE2. Therefore, the effects of MXD and DPHC on PGE2 production in HaCaT keratinocytes were determined by analyzing culture supernatants in cells treated with these compounds for 24 hr. The results showed that MXD (100 μM) increased PGE2 production (875.3 ± 41.1 pg/ml), while for DPHC, the increase in PGE2 was dose-dependent (365.2 ± 47.6, 830.0 ± 39.0, and 1013.2 ± 75.0 pg PGE2/ml at 12.5, 25, and 50 μg DPHC/ml, respectively, Fig. 1C).

Effect of DPHC on COX-1 and COX-2 protein expression

The effect of DPHC on the COX enzymes was confirmed at the protein level in HaCaT keratinocytes. Western blot and immunofluorescence analyses showed that DPHC treatment significantly increased the protein levels of COX-1 and COX-2. Specifically, DPHC treatment induced the expression of COX-1 proteins after 6 hr, with a steady increase for up to 24 hr. By contrast, the DPHC-mediated induction of COX-2 protein began after 12 hr and was weaker than that of COX-1. Moreover, a higher concentration of DPHC was needed to increase COX-2 expression (Fig. 2A, B). As seen in the time profile (Fig. 2C), DPHC induced COX-1 expression at an early phase (at 3 hr), while COX-2 expression was delayed.
Fig. 2.

Effect of DPHC on COX-1 and COX-2 expression in HaCaT human keratinocytes. The cells (5.0×105 cells/ml) were cultured for 18 hr and then treated with minoxidil (MXD, 100 μM) and DPHC (12.5, 25, 50 μg/ml) for 24 hr (A, B). COX-1, COX-2 and β-actin levels were determined by Western blotting (top) and confocal microscopy (bottom) after immunofluorescence staining with anti-COX-1, anti-COX-2, and, for nuclear staining, DAPI. Fluorescence was monitored using confocal microscopy (FV500, OLYMPUS). (C) Time-dependent effects of DPHC on COX-1 and COX-2 expression were determined in cells treated with DPHC (50 μg/ml) for the indicated times.

Effect of DPHC on the expression of COX-1, COX-2, and 15-PGDH mRNA

A time course of COX-1 and COX-2 mRNA expression was obtained by measuring the mRNA levels of both enzymes in HaCaT keratinocytes treated with DPHC for 3, 6, 12, and 24 hr. COX-1 mRNA expression was induced after 3 hr of DPHC treatment, with a further increase up to 6 hr, followed by a decrease beginning at 12 hr. The COX-2 expression profile differed, with a slight increase up to 24 hr (Fig. 3A, B). These mRNA expression profiles of COX-1 and -2 correlated with the intensity of the respective protein bands in the time profile (Fig. 2C).
Fig. 3.

Effect of DPHC on COX-1, COX-2, and PGDH mRNA expression in HaCaT human keratinocytes. Cells were cultured for 18 hr and then treated with DPHC (50 μg/ml) for the indicated times. COX-1 (A), COX-2 (B), PGDH (C), and GAPDH mRNA expression was determined by reverse-transcriptase PCR.

15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) is a key prostaglandin catabolic enzyme, and its cellular inhibition leads to the accumulation of PGE2 (Tai . Therefore, we asked whether the DPHC-mediated increase in COX-1 and COX-2 involved the inhibition of 15-PGDH. The mRNA levels of this enzyme were therefore measured in cells treated with DPHC. As shown by RT-PCR, incubation of the cells with 50 μg DPHC/ml for as long as 24 hr had no effect on 15-PGDH mRNA levels (Fig. 3C). These results suggested that DPHC increases PGE2 expression via the regulation of prostaglandin synthases (COX-1 and COX-2), rather than 15-PGDH.

Effects of DPHC and COX inhibitors on PGE2 production

The results thus far indicated that DPHC increased the expression of prostaglandin synthases, i.e., COX-1, and COX-2. We therefore examined PGE2 levels in cells co-treated with DPHC and COX inhibitors to confirm the role of these enzymes in the enhanced PGE2 expression in HaCaT keratinocytes. Indomethacin is a strong non-selective COX inhibitor, while rofecoxib selectively inhibits COX-2. Both inhibitors caused a decrease in DPHC-induced PGE2 levels. These results confirmed the roles of COX-1 and -2 in the observed increase in PGE2 production (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.

Effects of COX-2 inhibitors on DPHC-induced PGE2 production in HaCaT human keratinocytes. The cells (2.0×105 cells/ml) were cultured for 18 hr and then the cells treated with either a COX-2 non-selective inhibitor (indomethacin) or a COX-2 selective inhibitor (rofecoxib) in a presence of DPHC (50 μg/ml) for 24 hr. PGE2 levels were determined in an ELISA using cell supernatants in triplicate samples. Error bars indicate ± S.D. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001, significant compared to the DPHC-only control.

DISCUSSION

In the COX pathway, several PGs are produced. These autocrine or paracrine mediators signal changes within the immediate cell environment by binding to prostaglandin receptors linked to a cAMP signal transduction pathway (Dubois ; Maldve . The numerous biological activities of PGE2 include the maintenance of local homeostasis, the relaxation of vascular smooth muscle cells, and the enhancement of blood flow. Clinically, PGE2 and PGF2 are used in obstetrics to induce labor. In our experimental system consisting of HaCaT keratinocytes, both MXD and DPHC significantly increased PGE2 levels. MXD is well-known to slow down the hair loss and promote the hair growth as well as an anti-hypertensive agent. Its mechanism of activity involves the opening of ATP-sensitive K+-channels (Hamaoka ; Shorter , but it has also been show to up-regulate vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Lachgar in dermal papilla cells. In previous experiments, several compounds isolated from Jeju seaweeds individually showed weak effects in the same assay system used in the present study (data not shown). In 2009, Kim et al. reported that an ethanolic extract of I. okamurae had anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting NF-κB. Based on the introduction and these findings, we investigated the effect of DPHC on PGE2 production in macrophages (RAW264.7 cells) stimulated with LPS (1 μg/ml). In that study, DPHC failed to inhibit PGE2 production (data not shown), suggesting that the major anti-inflammatory agent in the ethanol extract prepared by Kim was not DPHC. The expression of both COX-1 and COX-2 is induced by the PG precursor arachidonic acid as well by its PG end-products. COX-1 is constitutively expressed in most cells and tissues, and synthesizes those PGs that regulate cellular physiological activities. By contrast, COX-2 is inducible and it is functionally involved in more specialized reactions, such as inflammation, fever, pain, and cancer (Dubois ; Warner and Mitchell, 2004). The differences in these two enzymes are reflected in their differential response to DPHC. DPHC-induced COX-1 expression occurred at a relatively early time point (3 hr), whereas COX-2 induction occurred at a later time point (12 hr) and required a higher concentration of the phlorotannin. The intracellular accumulation of PGE2 is regulated not only by its synthesis but also by its degradation. One of the key enzymes involved in PG catabolism is nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)-dependent 15-PGDH. This enzyme, which is widely distributed in various mammalian tissues (Tai , catalyzes the oxidation of the 15-hydroxy group of PGE2 to yield 15-keto PGE2 and plays an essential role in the biological inactivation of PGE2. However, there was no change in 15-PGDH mRNA expression in cells exposed for 24 hr to 50 μg DPHC/ml (Fig. 3C). Based on these results, COX-1 appears to be the major enzyme leading to PGE2 production. We lastly confirmed the influence of each COXs induced by DPHC on the PGE2 production. In 1971, aspirin, salicylate, and indomethacin were shown to inhibit PG synthesis via the inhibition of COX (PGHS) (Vane, 1971). In 1991, a second COX isoform was discovered, COX-2, and its induction in reactions related to inflammation, fever, pain, and stress adaptation was determined. The discovery of COX-2 was followed by the development of COX-2 selective inhibitors (meloxicam, celecoxib, and rofecoxib, etc.). Nonetheless, the effects of these synthases are complex and their respective activities have been difficult to distinguish. Consequently, we examined the PGE2 level in cultured human keratinocytes treated with DPHC and either the non-selective COX inhibitor indomethacin or the selective COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib. Both inhibitors significantly decreased the DPHC-mediated increase in PGE2 levels, suggesting the involvement of COX-1 as well as COX-2; however, due to the different potencies of indomethacin vs. rofecoxib, it remains unclear which is the major enzyme in PGE2 production. In conclusion, DPHC, a phlorotannin isolated from I. okamurae, increased PGE2 production by stimulating COX expression in HaCaT keratinocytes and might be beneficial compound for the treatment of hair regrowth.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Cyclooxygenase isozymes and their gene structures and expression.

Authors:  Tadashi Tanabe; Norimitsu Tohnai
Journal:  Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.072

2.  Minoxidil upregulates the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human hair dermal papilla cells.

Authors:  S Lachgar; M Charveron; Y Gall; J L Bonafe
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 3.  Regulation of 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Authors:  Hsin-Hsiung Tai; Xiuling Chi; Min Tong
Journal:  Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.072

Review 4.  Cyclooxygenase in biology and disease.

Authors:  R N Dubois; S B Abramson; L Crofford; R A Gupta; L S Simon; L B Van De Putte; P E Lipsky
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Activation of cytoprotective prostaglandin synthase-1 by minoxidil as a possible explanation for its hair growth-stimulating effect.

Authors:  J F Michelet; S Commo; N Billoni; Y F Mahé; B A Bernard
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Prostaglandins, bioassay and inflammation.

Authors:  R J Flower
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  Prostaglandins and inflammation.

Authors:  Emanuela Ricciotti; Garret A FitzGerald
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 8.311

8.  Influence of prostaglandin F2alpha and its analogues on hair regrowth and follicular melanogenesis in a murine model.

Authors:  S Sasaki; Y Hozumi; S Kondo
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 9.  NAD+-linked 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase: structure and biological functions.

Authors:  H-H Tai; H Cho; M Tong; Y Ding
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.116

10.  Prostaglandin E2 enhances hematopoietic stem cell homing, survival, and proliferation.

Authors:  Jonathan Hoggatt; Pratibha Singh; Janardhan Sampath; Louis M Pelus
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  4 in total

1.  Diphlorethohydroxycarmalol of Ishige okamurae and Caffeine Modified the Expression of Extracellular Fibrillars during Adipogenesis of Mouse Subcutaneous Adipose Derived Stem Cell.

Authors:  Younmi Jeon; Siyoung Song; Hagju Kim; Yong-Pil Cheon
Journal:  Dev Reprod       Date:  2013-09

2.  Transcriptional response of cultured porcine intestinal epithelial cells to micro algae extracts in the presence and absence of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Marcel Hulst; Rommie van der Weide; Arjan Hoekman; Marinus van Krimpen
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 5.523

3.  Protective Effect of Diphlorethohydroxycarmalol against Ultraviolet B Radiation-Induced DNA Damage by Inducing the Nucleotide Excision Repair System in HaCaT Human Keratinocytes.

Authors:  Mei Jing Piao; Susara Ruwan Kumara Madduma Hewage; Xia Han; Kyoung Ah Kang; Hee Kyoung Kang; Nam Ho Lee; Jin Won Hyun
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.118

4.  Diphlorethohydroxycarmalol Attenuates Palmitate-Induced Hepatic Lipogenesis and Inflammation.

Authors:  Seon-Heui Cha; Yongha Hwang; Soo-Jin Heo; Hee-Sook Jun
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 5.118

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.