Literature DB >> 24009301

Increased risk of cognitive impairment in patients with diabetes is associated with metformin.

Eileen M Moore1, Alastair G Mander, David Ames, Mark A Kotowicz, Ross P Carne, Henry Brodaty, Michael Woodward, Karyn Boundy, Kathryn A Ellis, Ashley I Bush, Noel G Faux, Ralph Martins, Cassandra Szoeke, Christopher Rowe, David A Watters.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations of metformin, serum vitamin B12, calcium supplements, and cognitive impairment in patients with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were recruited from the Primary Research in Memory (PRIME) clinics study, the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging, and the Barwon region of southeastern Australia. Patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) (n=480) or mild cognitive impairment (n=187) and those who were cognitively intact (n=687) were included; patients with stroke or with neurodegenerative diseases other than AD were excluded. Subgroup analyses were performed for participants who had either type 2 diabetes (n=104) or impaired glucose tolerance (n=22).
RESULTS: Participants with diabetes (n=126) had worse cognitive performance than participants who did not have diabetes (n=1,228; adjusted odds ratio 1.51 [95% CI 1.03-2.21]). Among participants with diabetes, worse cognitive performance was associated with metformin use (2.23 [1.05-4.75]). After adjusting for age, sex, level of education, history of depression, serum vitamin B12, and metformin use, participants with diabetes who were taking calcium supplements had better cognitive performance (0.41 [0.19-0.92]).
CONCLUSIONS: Metformin use was associated with impaired cognitive performance. Vitamin B12 and calcium supplements may alleviate metformin-induced vitamin B12 deficiency and were associated with better cognitive outcomes. Prospective trials are warranted to assess the beneficial effects of vitamin B12 and calcium use on cognition in older people with diabetes who are taking metformin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24009301      PMCID: PMC3781568          DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


In 2010, more than 346 million people had diabetes worldwide. Recent studies from the U.K. (1) and Italy (2) reported that the adult prevalence of diabetes was approximately 4.2%. In the U.S., the prevalence of diabetes in the adult population may be as high as 14% when undiagnosed cases are included (3). The prevalence of diabetes may be higher in some developing nations: in the developing region of southern China it was reported to be 21.7% in 2010 (4). The prevalence of diabetes is more than 20% in some Pacific Island nations, reaching 47% in 22- to 64-year-old American Samoans (5). In diabetes, hyperglycemia activates the cellular signaling protein kinase C, which induces production of the vasoconstrictor protein endothelin-1. Excess intracellular glucose is converted to sorbitol by the enzyme aldose reductase. When intracellular levels of glucose are high, this process exhausts the energy substrate NADPH, resulting in oxidative stress. High intracellular sorbitol levels cause osmotic stress and cell death. These biochemical changes in hyperglycemia are a proposed mechanism for macrovascular and microvascular complications and neuropathy (6–8). Diabetes is associated with a faster rate of cognitive decline in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (9) and an increased risk for developing Alzheimer disease (AD) (10). Approximately 90% of patients with diabetes have type 2 diabetes (1). The biguanide metformin is a first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes, increasing glucose uptake in muscle while reducing liver gluconeogenesis (the synthesis of glucose from amino acids). These effects are mediated by activation of the cellular signaling protein AMP–activated protein kinase (11). Metformin first became available in the U.K. in 1958 and entered the Canadian market in 1971, but it has been available in the U.S. only since 1995. In a survey of 65,000 U.S. war veterans (12), metformin use among those with diabetes increased from 29% in 2000 to 63% in 2005. Among 242 Australian veterans who had diabetes, metformin was used by 75% in 2005 but decreased to 57% in 2009 (13). The rate of vitamin B12 deficiency among patients who are taking metformin is reported to approach 30% (14–16). A drug interaction between metformin and the cubilin receptor inhibits the uptake of vitamin B12 from the distal ileum, lowering serum vitamin B12 levels. In a long-term, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, metformin therapy in type 2 diabetes was associated with a 19% reduction in serum vitamin B12 concentrations compared with placebo (17). In a case-control study, Wile and Toth (18) reported that metformin use was associated with reduced vitamin B12 levels and more severe peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes. In a prospective trial, calcium supplements were reported to reverse the drug interaction that causes vitamin B12 deficiency induced by metformin (19). The clinical significance of alleviating metformin-induced vitamin B12 malabsorption by calcium supplementation has not been previously investigated. By correcting vitamin B12 levels in patients with diabetes who use metformin, calcium supplements may help to preserve cognitive function. In addition, neuronal signaling in memory and learning involves a calcium-mediated process, so calcium supplementation may also have a direct effect on the brain. Calcium dysregulation is the subject of one proposed theory for age-related cognitive changes and AD (20). The risks and potential benefits of calcium supplementation on cognition and for alleviating vitamin B12 malabsorption merit further investigation. The amyloid plaques seen in the brains of patients with AD are formed by aggregation of Aβ peptides. In cell cultures, Chen and colleagues (21) reported that activation of AMP–activated protein kinase by metformin increased the expression of β-secretase, an enzyme that increases the formation of Aβ peptides. One recent case-control study that included 14,172 participants 65 years of age or older reported that taking metformin over the long term increased the risk of AD (odds ratio [OR] 1.71 [95% CI 1.12–2.60]) (22). Recent studies of murine models of diabetes indicate that metformin may attenuate irregularities in phosphorylation of tau proteins (23) or may facilitate neuroneogenesis (24) and so may be of benefit to those with AD. In 25,393 patients older than 50 years with type 2 diabetes, metformin was reported to reduce the risk of dementia by 24% (hazard ratio 0.76 [95% CI 0.58–0.98]) (25). The purpose of our study was to investigate the associations of metformin, serum vitamin B12 levels, and cognition in a sample of patients with diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Participants and settings

Participants were recruited from two prospective studies: the Prospective Research in Memory (PRIME) clinics study and the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging. Only data and biochemical measurements pertaining to baseline visits were included in this analysis. The PRIME study recruited 970 participants from 9 sites in Australia, including 3 each in Victoria and New South Wales and 1 each in Queensland, Western Australia, and South Australia. The AIBL study of aging recruited 1,112 participants in Victoria (60%) and Western Australia (40%). The study cohorts and methods of the PRIME and AIBL studies are described elsewhere (26,27). A further 862 participants who resided in the Barwon region of southeastern Australia between 2001 and 2011 also were recruited through the Cognitive, Dementia and Memory Services clinic at the McKellar Centre, a rehabilitation and aged-care facility. Patients with AD who were seen at a geriatrician’s private practice during the same period also were recruited (n = 935).

Study design

Participants in the PRIME study were recruited during routine patient care. AIBL participants volunteered after an advertisement on television in late 2006. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to assess cognitive ability. Subjects were assessed at scheduled visits during the PRIME and AIBL studies or ad hoc during routine patient care. All participants with serum vitamin B12 measurements taken within 6 months of cognitive assessment were included. Participants without serum measurements taken within 6 months of cognitive assessment (n = 1,015) were excluded. The data from records pertaining to subjects who were recruited from more than one source (n = 566) were merged. Of the remaining participants, there were 121 with stroke and 566 with diagnoses other than AD, such as frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, or mixed dementias. Participants with other neurodegenerative diseases were excluded to limit confounders. A further 291 participants were excluded because they had incomplete medical histories; information that was missing included dates of birth, medication use, and comorbid conditions. A subgroup analysis was performed with participants who had diabetes (n = 104) or impaired glucose tolerance (n = 22). Patients with type 1 diabetes were not specifically excluded, but there were none with serum vitamin B12 measurements taken within 6 months of cognitive assessment.

Ethical approval

Institutional review was performed at each study host site. Reviewing committees included the Barwon Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (Victoria), Austin Health HREC (Victoria), St. Vincent’s Hospital Governance Review Unit (Victoria), Hunter New England HREC (New South Wales), Northern Hospital Network HREC (New South Wales), Northern Sydney Central Coast HREC (New South Wales), Metro North Health Service District HREC (Queensland), South Metropolitan Area Health Service HREC (Western Australia), and The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Ethics of Human Research Committee (South Australia).

Statistical analyses

An ordinal logistic regression model was formed with categories of cognitive performance as the response variable and diabetes as a predictor. Categories were ordered by cognitive performance, including “most impaired” (MMSE <18; n = 137), “mildly impaired” (MMSE 18–23; n = 240), “minimally impaired” (MMSE 24–27; n = 295), and “not impaired” (MMSE 28–30; n = 682). The model was adjusted for age, sex, level of education, and depression because these factors were previously reported to affect MMSE testing (28,29). A subgroup analysis of only patients with diabetes was then performed. The response variable was cognitive performance. Categories were “most impaired” (MMSE <18; n = 39), “mildly impaired” (MMSE 18–23; n = 40), “minimally impaired” (MMSE 24–27; n = 32), and “not impaired” (MMSE 28–30; n = 15). The effect of metformin on the cognitive performance of patients with diabetes was investigated in this model, which then was adjusted for serum vitamin B12 measurements and use of calcium supplements to investigate any possible interactions. There was insufficient information on use of other antidiabetic drugs, the duration of metformin use, and markers for socioeconomic status, diet, or exercise to investigate these variables.

RESULTS

There were 1,354 participants included in this analysis (Fig. 1). Participants were 51–99 years old (mean age ± SD 73.8 ± 8.3 years); females outnumbered males (59.5 vs. 40.5%). Just more than half of the participants (50.4%) scored 28–30 on the MMSE and so were considered not impaired; 21.8% were minimally impaired (MMSE 24–27), 17.7% were mildly impaired (MMSE 18–23), and 10.1% scored less than 18 on the MMSE (most impaired).
Figure 1

Recruitment, inclusion, and exclusion.

Recruitment, inclusion, and exclusion. Participants with diabetes were marginally older than participants without diabetes (75.5 vs. 73.6 years; P = 0.013). The number of males was proportionally larger among participants with diabetes (46.8 vs. 39.9%), but this difference was not statistically significant. Prevalence of depression was similar between participants with diabetes and those without diabetes (31.7 vs. 27.3%; P = 1.000). The proportion of participants with a tertiary level of education was higher among participants without diabetes than participants with diabetes (39.3 vs. 22.2%; P < 0.001). The number of participants who scored below 28 on the MMSE was proportionally higher among participants with diabetes than those without diabetes (69.0 vs. 47.6%; P = 1.000). After adjusting for age, sex, education, and depression, participants with type 2 diabetes had worse cognitive performance than participants without diabetes (adjusted OR 1.51 [95% CI 1.03–2.21]). Cognitive performance was better in younger participants, those without depression, and those with a higher level of education. The adjusted ORs for each predictor are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Cognitive performance in 1,354 participants who had AD or MCI or were cognitively intact

Cognitive performance in 1,354 participants who had AD or MCI or were cognitively intact Among participants with diabetes, cognitive performance was worse in patients who were taking metformin (adjusted OR 2.23 [95% CI 1.05–4.75]). MMSE scores were lower in participants with diabetes who used metformin (mean score ± SD 22.8 ± 5.5) than in those who did not use metformin (24.7 ± 4.4). Participants with diabetes who had vitamin B12 levels <250 ρmol/L also had worse cognitive performance (2.29 [1.12–4.66]). MMSE scores were lower among those with serum vitamin B12 <250 ρmol/L (22.9 ± 4.7) than those with higher levels (25.0 ± 4.7). Each 1-year increase in age was associated with an 8% increased risk of impaired cognitive performance (OR 1.08 [95% CI 1.03–1.13]). A secondary or tertiary level of education was the strongest predictor of better cognitive performance in patients with diabetes. The adjusted ORs for each variable are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Cognitive performance in 126 patients with either type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance

Cognitive performance in 126 patients with either type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, patients with diabetes who were taking metformin had worse cognitive performance than participants who were not taking metformin. Our observations agree with those previously reported by Imfeld and colleagues (22), in particular that patients who are taking metformin may be at an increased risk for cognitive impairment. This association was weakened after adjusting for serum vitamin B12 levels; thus any effect metformin has on cognitive performance may be at least partially mediated by altering serum vitamin B12 levels. Alternatively, patients who are prescribed metformin may have worse glycemic control or diabetes-related complications than patients with diabetes who are not prescribed metformin, so there remains the potential for confounding, despite restricting the analysis to only patients with diabetes. However, because metformin is a first-line pharmacotherapy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, this would seem unlikely (30). There was insufficient information regarding the duration of metformin use, the severity of diabetes (e.g., HbA1c levels), duration of diabetes, or use of other antidiabetic drugs to enable us to investigate these effects in our study, particularly because these findings were based on a small sample. We recommend a larger study to examine the effect of dose and duration of metformin use, and the effects of other antidiabetic agents using a battery of cognitive assessments and following participants over a number of years. Calcium supplements have previously been reported to reverse vitamin B12 deficiency induced by metformin. In this study, patients with diabetes who used calcium supplements were less likely to be cognitively impaired. However, calcium supplements have been reported to be associated with an increased risk for myocardial infarction in postmenopausal women and in patients with chronic kidney disease (31–34). In contrast, a recent meta-analysis indicates that supplementation with both vitamin D and calcium is associated with a reduction in mortality compared with vitamin D supplementation alone (35). Because this population already has increased cardiovascular risk (36), the safety of calcium supplementation in patients with diabetes treated with metformin would need to be established before such interventions could be recommended. Patients with diabetes are at an increased risk for AD (10). In diabetes, amylin aggregation destroys the β-cells of the pancreas (37). By the same mechanism, a protein misfolding disorder may be related to aggregation of amyloid plaques. Metformin is a widely prescribed first-line monotherapy for type 2 diabetes but is associated with vitamin B12 deficiency and peripheral neuropathy. A case-control study of more than 14,000 patients reported that long-term metformin use was associated with an increased risk for AD in those ≥65 years old (22). Metformin at pharmacological doses was reported to increase the expression of β-secretase in cell culture; this may be a possible disease mechanism (21). Alternatively, metformin also impairs absorption of vitamin B12 via a drug interaction that occurs at the distal ileum. Low serum vitamin B12 levels are associated with AD and other neurodegenerative diseases (38). Cognitive performance of patients with diabetes was measured using the MMSE. The MMSE may be inadequate for detecting differences between higher functioning adults (39). The MMSE is sensitive to age, depression, and level of education, so all models were adjusted for these factors. Most of our subjects were assessed during routine clinical care by clinicians who use the MMSE as part of their standard assessment. In Australia, documentation of cognitive impairment using an MMSE score and improvement while receiving therapy is required to obtain subsidized antidementia therapies (40). More comprehensive assessment tools may be preferable for use in future investigations of cognitive impairment in at-risk populations such as those we have studied. Increased monitoring of cognitive ability in patients with diabetes who use metformin is warranted, particularly among older adults (aged older than 50 years). Vitamin B12 supplements are inexpensive and may improve the cognitive outcomes of patients with diabetes. Adequately powered, prospective, controlled trials are warranted to investigate further the association between diabetes, cognitive decline, and the effect of metformin therapy, as well as the possible amelioration using vitamin B12 and/or calcium supplementation.
  37 in total

Review 1.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus as a conformational disease.

Authors:  Melvin R Hayden; Suresh C Tyagi; Michelle M Kerklo; Mark R Nicolls
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2005-07-08

2.  Prevalence, incidence and mortality of diagnosed diabetes: evidence from an Italian population-based study.

Authors:  L Monesi; M Baviera; I Marzona; F Avanzini; G Monesi; A Nobili; M Tettamanti; L Cortesi; E Riva; I Fortino; A Bortolotti; G Fontana; L Merlino; M C Roncaglioni
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  Metformin attenuates Alzheimer's disease-like neuropathology in obese, leptin-resistant mice.

Authors:  Jiejie Li; Jiao Deng; Wenli Sheng; Zhiyi Zuo
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Vitamin B 12 and metformin.

Authors:  J M Stowers; O A Smith
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1971-07-24

5.  Increased intake of calcium reverses vitamin B12 malabsorption induced by metformin.

Authors:  W A Bauman; S Shaw; E Jayatilleke; A M Spungen; V Herbert
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Metformin, other antidiabetic drugs, and risk of Alzheimer's disease: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Patrick Imfeld; Michael Bodmer; Susan S Jick; Christoph R Meier
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 7.  Calcium signaling in cognition and aging-dependent cognitive decline.

Authors:  Ana M M Oliveira; Hilmar Bading
Journal:  Biofactors       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Diabetes is associated with increased rate of cognitive decline in questionably demented elderly.

Authors:  Ramit Ravona-Springer; Xiaodong Luo; James Schmeidler; Michael Wysocki; Gerson Lesser; Michael Rapp; Karen Dahlman; Hillel Grossman; Vahram Haroutunian; Michal Schnaider Beeri
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.959

9.  Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence.

Authors:  James P Boyle; Theodore J Thompson; Edward W Gregg; Lawrence E Barker; David F Williamson
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2010-10-22

Review 10.  Hyperhomocysteinemia and its role in the development of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  A B Lawrence de Koning; Geoff H Werstuck; Ji Zhou; Richard C Austin
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.281

View more
  111 in total

1.  Prolonged metformin treatment leads to reduced transcription of Nrf2 and neurotrophic factors without cognitive impairment in older C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Joanne S Allard; Evelyn J Perez; Koji Fukui; Priscilla Carpenter; Donald K Ingram; Rafael de Cabo
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Glucose regulation and cognitive function after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Rachel Galioto; Michael L Alosco; Mary Beth Spitznagel; Gladys Strain; Michael Devlin; Ronald Cohen; Ross D Crosby; James E Mitchell; John Gunstad
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.475

Review 3.  Type 2 diabetes and cognitive impairment: contributions from neuroimaging.

Authors:  John P Ryan; David F Fine; Caterina Rosano
Journal:  J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 2.680

4.  Metformin: are potential benefits on cancer risk extended to cancer survival?

Authors:  Carlo La Vecchia; Cristina Bosetti
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-11-20

Review 5.  Nutritional strategies to optimise cognitive function in the aging brain.

Authors:  Devin Wahl; Victoria C Cogger; Samantha M Solon-Biet; Rosilene V R Waern; Rahul Gokarn; Tamara Pulpitel; Rafael de Cabo; Mark P Mattson; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson; David G Le Couteur
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2016-06-26       Impact factor: 10.895

6.  Differential effects of metformin on age related comorbidities in older men with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Chen-Pin Wang; Carlos Lorenzo; Samy L Habib; Booil Jo; Sara E Espinoza
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 2.852

Review 7.  New views and possibilities of antidiabetic drugs in treating and/or preventing mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Kai Long Zhong; Fang Chen; Hao Hong; Xuan Ke; Yang Ge Lv; Su Su Tang; Yu Bing Zhu
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.584

8.  Metformin: good or bad for the brain?

Authors:  Ilker Tasci
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2014-06

9.  Metformin in the diabetic brain: friend or foe?

Authors:  Paula I Moreira
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2014-06

Review 10.  Therapeutic Potential of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Helena R Zimmermann; Tao Ma
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.