Literature DB >> 24009155

Semen parameters in fertile US men: the Study for Future Families.

J B Redmon1, W Thomas, W Ma, E Z Drobnis, A Sparks, C Wang, C Brazil, J W Overstreet, F Liu, S H Swan.   

Abstract

Establishing reference norms for semen parameters in fertile men is important for accurate assessment, counselling and treatment of men with male factor infertility. Identifying temporal or geographic variability in semen quality also requires accurate measurement of semen parameters in well-characterized, defined populations of men. The Study for Future Families (SFF) recruited men who were partners of pregnant women attending prenatal clinics in Los Angeles CA, Minneapolis MN, Columbia MO, New York City NY and Iowa City IA. Semen samples were collected on site from 763 men (73% White, 15% Hispanic/Latino, 7% Black and 5% Asian or other ethnic group) using strict quality control and well-defined protocols. Semen volume (by weight), sperm concentration (hemacytometer) and sperm motility were measured at each centre. Sperm morphology (both WHO, 1999 strict and WHO, 1987) was determined at a central laboratory. Mean abstinence was 3.2 days. Mean (median; 5th-95th percentile) values were: semen volume, 3.9 (3.7; 1.5-6.8) mL; sperm concentration, 60 (67; 12-192) × 10(6) /mL; total sperm count 209 (240; 32-763) × 10(6) ; % motile, 51 (52; 28-67) %; and total motile sperm count, 104 (128; 14-395) × 10(6) respectively. Values for sperm morphology were 11 (10; 3-20) % and 57 (59; 38-72) % normal forms for WHO (1999) (strict) and WHO (1987) criteria respectively. Black men had significantly lower semen volume, sperm concentration and total motile sperm counts than White and Hispanic/Latino men. Semen parameters were marginally higher in men who achieved pregnancy more quickly but differences were small and not statistically significant. The SFF provides robust estimates of semen parameters in fertile men living in five different geographic locations in the US. Fertile men display wide variation in all of the semen parameters traditionally used to assess fertility potential.
© 2013 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  sperm concentration; sperm morphology; sperm motility

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24009155      PMCID: PMC3812375          DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00125.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN: 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


  16 in total

1.  Quality control of laboratory methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study.

Authors:  Charlene Brazil; Shanna H Swan; Charlene R Tollner; Cathy Treece; Erma Z Drobnis; Christina Wang; J Bruce Redmon; James W Overstreet
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

2.  Standardized methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study.

Authors:  Charlene Brazil; Shanna H Swan; Erma Z Drobnis; Fan Liu; Christina Wang; J Bruce Redmon; James W Overstreet
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

3.  One semen sample or 2? Insights from a study of fertile men.

Authors:  Abbie Stokes-Riner; Sally W Thurston; Charlene Brazil; David Guzick; Fan Liu; James W Overstreet; Christina Wang; Amy Sparks; J Bruce Redmon; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2007-05-23

4.  Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility.

Authors:  Kiran P Nallella; Rakesh K Sharma; Nabil Aziz; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for poor semen quality: a case-referent study.

Authors:  A C Povey; J-A Clyma; R McNamee; H D Moore; H Baillie; A A Pacey; N M Cherry
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics.

Authors:  Trevor G Cooper; Elizabeth Noonan; Sigrid von Eckardstein; Jacques Auger; H W Gordon Baker; Hermann M Behre; Trine B Haugen; Thinus Kruger; Christina Wang; Michael T Mbizvo; Kirsten M Vogelsong
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the past 20 years.

Authors:  J Auger; J M Kunstmann; F Czyglik; P Jouannet
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-02-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners.

Authors:  J P Bonde; E Ernst; T K Jensen; N H Hjollund; H Kolstad; T B Henriksen; T Scheike; A Giwercman; J Olsen; N E Skakkebaek
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-10-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Geographic differences in semen quality of fertile U.S. males.

Authors:  Shanna H Swan; Charlene Brazil; Erma Z Drobnis; Fan Liu; Robin L Kruse; Maureen Hatch; J Bruce Redmon; Christina Wang; James W Overstreet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Semen quality in relation to biomarkers of pesticide exposure.

Authors:  Shanna H Swan; Robin L Kruse; Fan Liu; Dana B Barr; Erma Z Drobnis; J Bruce Redmon; Christina Wang; Charlene Brazil; James W Overstreet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Validity of Claims Data for the Identification of Male Infertility.

Authors:  Yash S Khandwala; Chiyuan A Zhang; Shufeng Li; Mark R Cullen; Michael L Eisenberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Small RNAs in Rat Sperm Are a Predictive and Sensitive Biomarker of Exposure to the Testicular Toxicant Ethylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether.

Authors:  Angela R Stermer; Gerardo Reyes; Susan J Hall; Kim Boekelheide
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  The effect of ethnicity on semen analysis and hormones in the infertile patient.

Authors:  Nahid Punjani; Madhur Nayan; Keith Jarvi; Kirk Lo; Susan Lau; Ethan D Grober
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated needs from newer tests.

Authors:  Christina Wang; Ronald S Swerdloff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Detection of candidate nectin gene mutations in infertile men with severe teratospermia.

Authors:  Richard Bronson; Anatoly Mikhailik; John Schwedes; Dimitri Gnatenko; Eli Hatchwell
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Occupation and Semen Parameters in a Cohort of Fertile Men.

Authors:  John D Meyer; Charlene Brazil; J Bruce Redmon; Christina Wang; Amy E Sparks; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.306

Review 7.  Spatiotemporal trends in human semen quality.

Authors:  Jacques Auger; Florence Eustache; Cécile Chevrier; Bernard Jégou
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 16.430

8.  Phthalate exposure and semen quality in fertile US men.

Authors:  S W Thurston; J Mendiola; A R Bellamy; H Levine; C Wang; A Sparks; J B Redmon; E Z Drobnis; S H Swan
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 9.  Male Reproductive Disorders and Fertility Trends: Influences of Environment and Genetic Susceptibility.

Authors:  Niels E Skakkebaek; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts; Germaine M Buck Louis; Jorma Toppari; Anna-Maria Andersson; Michael L Eisenberg; Tina Kold Jensen; Niels Jørgensen; Shanna H Swan; Katherine J Sapra; Søren Ziebe; Lærke Priskorn; Anders Juul
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 37.312

10.  Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of Human Semen Quality in Russian Multiethnic Population.

Authors:  Semyon Kolmykov; Gennady Vasiliev; Ludmila Osadchuk; Maxim Kleschev; Alexander Osadchuk
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.