Literature DB >> 24008924

FLAIR-only progression in bevacizumab-treated relapsing glioblastoma does not predict short survival.

Christina Schaub1, Susanne Greschus, Mirko Seifert, Andreas Waha, Elias Blasius, Katja Rasch, Christiane Landwehr, Frederic Mack, Niklas Schäfer, Moritz Stuplich, Sied Kebir, Belinda Vilz, Björn Scheffler, Jan Boström, Matthias Simon, Horst Urbach, Martin Glas, Ulrich Herrlinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we analyzed the prognostic value of different MRI progression patterns for survival in patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with the vascular endothelial growth factor antibody bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six adult patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with bevacizumab or bevacizumab/irinotecan were retrospectively analyzed for the development of contrast-enhanced (T1-weighted MRI) and T2/FLAIR lesions. According to the progression pattern, patients were divided into 3 subgroups: (1) patients with primarily progressive contrast-enhanced lesions in the first MRI after initiation of therapy ('primary PD group'); (2) patients with stable or regressive enhanced lesions but progressive FLAIR lesions ('FLAIR-only PD group'), and (3) patients with stable or regressive contrast-enhanced T1 and FLAIR lesions ('no PD group').
RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) in the 6 patients in the FLAIR-only PD group was not significantly different from the 11 patients in the no PD group (median 311 vs. 254 days, respectively). In contrast, survival in the FLAIR-only PD group was significantly better (p = 0.025) than in the primary PD group.
CONCLUSION: FLAIR-only progression is not an independent prognostic factor negatively influencing OS in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab and should not lead to discontinuation of bevacizumab therapy.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24008924     DOI: 10.1159/000354692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  10 in total

1.  A phase I study of cediranib in combination with cilengitide in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Gerstner; Xiaobu Ye; Dan G Duda; Michael A Levine; Tom Mikkelsen; Thomas J Kaley; Jeffrey J Olson; Burt L Nabors; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Patrick Y Wen; Rakesh K Jain; Tracy T Batchelor; Stuart Grossman
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Is a picture really worth a 1000 words?

Authors:  Elizabeth R Gerstner
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Pros and cons of current brain tumor imaging.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Patrick Y Wen; Martin J van den Bent; Timothy F Cloughesy
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Tumor growth patterns of MGMT-non-methylated glioblastoma in the randomized GLARIUS trial.

Authors:  Christina Schaub; Sied Kebir; Nina Junold; Elke Hattingen; Niklas Schäfer; Joachim P Steinbach; Astrid Weyerbrock; Peter Hau; Roland Goldbrunner; Michael Niessen; Frederic Mack; Moritz Stuplich; Theophilos Tzaridis; Oliver Bähr; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann; Uwe Schlegel; Friederike Schmidt-Graf; Veit Rohde; Christian Braun; Mathias Hänel; Michael Sabel; Rüdiger Gerlach; Dietmar Krex; Claus Belka; Hartmut Vatter; Martin Proescholdt; Ulrich Herrlinger; Martin Glas
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Comparison of 2D (RANO) and volumetric methods for assessment of recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab-a report from the BELOB trial.

Authors:  Renske Gahrmann; Martin van den Bent; Bronno van der Holt; René Michel Vernhout; Walter Taal; Maaike Vos; Jan Cees de Groot; Laurens Victor Beerepoot; Jan Buter; Zwenneke Hendrieke Flach; Monique Hanse; Bas Jasperse; Marion Smits
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of imaging in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults.

Authors:  Derek Richard Johnson; Chad Allan Glenn; Ramin Javan; Jeffrey James Olson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Neuroimaging classification of progression patterns in glioblastoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rory J Piper; Keerthi K Senthil; Jiun-Lin Yan; Stephen J Price
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Change in 18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET Is an Early Predictor of the Prognosis in the Patients with Recurrent High-Grade Glioma Receiving Bevacizumab Treatment.

Authors:  Shigeru Yamaguchi; Kenji Hirata; Takuya Toyonaga; Kentaro Kobayashi; Yukitomo Ishi; Hiroaki Motegi; Hiroyuki Kobayashi; Tohru Shiga; Nagara Tamaki; Shunsuke Terasaka; Kiyohiro Houkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Radiological Recurrence Patterns after Bevacizumab Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Se Jin Cho; Ho Sung Kim; Chong Hyun Suh; Ji Eun Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Retrospective Analysis of Radiological Recurrence Patterns in Glioblastoma, Their Prognostic Value And Association to Postoperative Infarct Volume.

Authors:  Stefanie Bette; Melanie Barz; Thomas Huber; Christoph Straube; Friederike Schmidt-Graf; Stephanie E Combs; Claire Delbridge; Julia Gerhardt; Claus Zimmer; Bernhard Meyer; Jan S Kirschke; Tobias Boeckh-Behrens; Benedikt Wiestler; Jens Gempt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.