Literature DB >> 24008087

Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with antegrade esophageal inversion for high-grade dysplasia and invasive esophageal cancer.

Kyle A Perry1, Luke M Funk, Peter Muscarella, W Scott Melvin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined the safety and effectiveness of antegrade laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy (LIE) for patients with multifocal high-grade dysplasia and distal esophageal cancer.
METHODS: We reviewed our experience with antegrade LIE, using an institutional research board-approved prospective database.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with an average age of 64 years underwent LIE. Indications included multifocal high-grade dysplasia (n = 4), adenocarcinoma (n = 30), and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 2); 11 patients had undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiation. LIE was completed successfully in 34 (94%) patients, whereas 2 required a conversion to open transhiatal esophagectomy. LIE required 221 minutes to perform, with a median blood loss of 100 mL. R0 resection was achieved in 97% of cases with a median lymph node harvest 15. Median hospital stay was 8 days, and 61% of patients were discharged to their home. Postoperative complications included anastomotic leak (n = 11) and stricture (n = 18), atrial arrhythmia (n = 5), pneumonia (n = 4), and tracheoesophageal fistula (n = 2). Operative outcomes after neoadjuvant therapy did not differ from those for primary operative resection.
CONCLUSION: Antegrade LIE is a safe treatment approach for patients with high-grade dysplasia and distal esophageal cancer. Complete resection with an adequate lymph node harvest can be achieved consistently for primary operative resection or after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24008087     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  5 in total

1.  Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for early esophageal squamous cell neoplasia: report of safety and effectiveness from a large prospective trial.

Authors:  Shun He; Jacques Bergman; Yueming Zhang; Bas Weusten; Liyan Xue; Xiumin Qin; Lizhou Dou; Yong Liu; David Fleischer; Ning Lu; Sanford M Dawsey; Gui-Qi Wang
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 2.  Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Joel H Rubenstein; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Elena Pallari; Sumit Midya; Muntzer Mughal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-31

4.  The effect of disc-shaped gastric resection of anastomosis site on reducing postoperative dysphagia and stricture after esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Rahim Mahmodlou; Kamran Shateri; Faramarz Homayooni; Sanaz Hatami
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2016-02-17

5.  TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY IN SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS: WHAT ARE THE BEST INDICATIONS?

Authors:  Felipe Monge Vieira; Marcio Fernandes Chedid; Richard Ricachenevsky Gurski; Carlos Cauduro Schirmer; Leandro Totti Cavazzola; Ricardo Vitiello Schramm; André Ricardo Pereira Rosa; Cleber Dario Pinto Kruel
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2021-03-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.