Literature DB >> 2400793

Psychophysiological responsivity on a laboratory stress task: methodological implications for a stress-muscle hyperactivity pain model.

G T Montgomery1, J D Rugh.   

Abstract

A stress-muscle hyperactivity-pain (SMP) model has been proposed to explain the etiology of certain musculoskeletal pain disorders. According to this model, subjects should show physiological arousal during periods of stress relative to periods of rest. In a test of this prediction, 31 subjects performed a reaction time task that has been used in previous laboratory studies. Multiple psychophysiological variables were monitored during initial and final 10-minute baselines, during performance on nine 2-minute reaction time tasks, and during 36-second rest intervals following each of the 2-minute tasks, Results showed small but statistically significant differences generally supporting the SMP model when masseter EMG was averaged over time periods of 12 seconds to 2 minutes, but not when masseter EMG was averaged over 10- to 18-minute blocks. These results demonstrated the importance of carefully selecting time intervals for analysis. Additional analyses that compared TMD with symptom-free subjects revealed small differences in EMG that supported the SMP model. Analyses of EMG over shorter time intervals also showed, however, that masseter EMG increased during the 36-second rest interval following performance on a 2-minute stress task; this result suggested that a modification of the SMP model may be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2400793     DOI: 10.1007/bf00999143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  11 in total

1.  [Psychosomatic aspects of temporomandibular joint dysfunction].

Authors:  W L KYDD
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1959-07       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Physiological reactions of patients with TM disorders vs symptom-free controls on a physical stress task.

Authors:  J D Rugh; G T Montgomery
Journal:  J Craniomandib Disord       Date:  1987

3.  Electromyographic correlates of experimentally induced stress in diurnal bruxists and normals.

Authors:  S M Rao; A G Glaros
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  The role of relaxation in biofeedback training: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  L Tarler-Benlolo
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Variations in the electrical activity of the human masseter muscle occurring in association with emotional stress.

Authors:  R Yemm
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 2.633

6.  Stress-induced muscular activity in mandibular dysfunction: effects of biofeedback training.

Authors:  L Dahlström; S G Carlsson; E N Gale; T G Jansson
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1985-06

7.  Temporomandibular joint dysfunction and myofascial pain dysfunction syndromes: parameters, etiology, and treatment.

Authors:  R A Moss; J Garrett; J F Chiodo
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 8.  Psychological implications in temporomandibular pain and dysfunction.

Authors:  J D Rugh; W K Solberg
Journal:  Oral Sci Rev       Date:  1976

Review 9.  Neurophysiologic studies of temporomandibular joint dysfunction.

Authors:  R Yemm
Journal:  Oral Sci Rev       Date:  1976

10.  The specificity of response to experimental stress in patients with myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome.

Authors:  L G Mercuri; R E Olson; D M Laskin
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.