Literature DB >> 24007351

Research priorities for geriatric palliative care: goals, values, and preferences.

Laura C Hanson1, Gary Winzelberg.   

Abstract

Older patients and their families desire control over health decisions in serious illness. Experts recommend discussion of prognosis and goals of care prior to decisions about treatment. Having achieved longevity, older persons often prioritize other goals such as function, comfort, or family support--and skilled communication is critical to shift treatment to match these goals. Shared decision making is the ideal approach in serious illness. Older patients desire greater family involvement; higher rates of cognitive impairment mean greater dependency on surrogates to make decisions. Despite the importance of communication, fewer than half of older patients or families recall treatment discussions with clinicians, and poor quality communication adversely affects family satisfaction and patient outcomes. Direct audiorecording of clinical encounters and longitudinal studies of communication and treatment decisions have yielded important insights into the quality of clinical communication. Current clinical practice rarely meets standards for shared decision making. Innovative methods to record and use patient preferences show promise to overcome the limitations of traditional advance directives. Decision aids, intensive clinician training, and structured interpersonal communication interventions have all been shown to be effective to improve the quality of communication and decision making. Priorities for geriatric palliative care research, building on these insights, now include empirical testing of communication approaches for surrogates and for diverse populations, exploration of meaningful ways to communicate prognosis, and expansion of intervention research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24007351      PMCID: PMC3837560          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2013.9475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  66 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of a goals-of-care video for elderly patients admitted to skilled nursing facilities.

Authors:  Angelo E Volandes; Gary H Brandeis; Aretha Delight Davis; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Muriel R Gillick; Yuchiao Chang; Elizabeth S Walker-Corkery; Eileen Mann; Susan L Mitchell
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  A prospective study of the efficacy of the physician order form for life-sustaining treatment.

Authors:  S W Tolle; V P Tilden; C A Nelson; P M Dunn
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  Randomized, controlled trials of interventions to improve communication in intensive care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leslie P Scheunemann; Michelle McDevitt; Shannon S Carson; Laura C Hanson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Improving decision-making for feeding options in advanced dementia: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura C Hanson; Timothy S Carey; Anthony J Caprio; Tae Joon Lee; Mary Ersek; Joanne Garrett; Anne Jackman; Robin Gilliam; Kathryn Wessell; Susan L Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Patients' expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Paul J Catalano; Angel Cronin; Matthew D Finkelman; Jennifer W Mack; Nancy L Keating; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients?

Authors:  J A Tulsky; M A Chesney; B Lo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The clinical course of advanced dementia.

Authors:  Susan L Mitchell; Joan M Teno; Dan K Kiely; Michele L Shaffer; Richard N Jones; Holly G Prigerson; Ladislav Volicer; Jane L Givens; Mary Beth Hamel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Patient-oncologist communication in advanced cancer: predictors of patient perception of prognosis.

Authors:  Tracy M Robinson; Stewart C Alexander; Margie Hays; Amy S Jeffreys; Maren K Olsen; Keri L Rodriguez; Kathryn I Pollak; Amy P Abernethy; Robert Arnold; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lawrence J Schneiderman; Todd Gilmer; Holly D Teetzel; Daniel O Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald Cranford; Kathleen B Briggs; Glen I Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W D Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Predictors of distress and quality of life in patients undergoing cancer therapy: impact of treatment type and decisional role.

Authors:  Thomas F Hack; Tom Pickles; J Dean Ruether; Lorna Weir; Barry D Bultz; John Mackey; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  13 in total

1.  Practice-Based Research Priorities for Palliative Care: Results From a Research-to-Practice Consensus Workshop.

Authors:  Karl Pillemer; Emily K Chen; Catherine Riffin; Holly Prigerson; M C Reid
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Leveraging the health and retirement study to advance palliative care research.

Authors:  Amy S Kelley; Kenneth M Langa; Alexander K Smith; John Cagle; Katherine Ornstein; Maria J Silveira; Lauren Nicholas; Kenneth E Covinsky; Christine S Ritchie
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  The National Palliative Care Research Center: Ten Years of Promoting and Developing Research in Palliative Care.

Authors:  R Sean Morrison; Melissa D Aldridge; James Block; Lily Chiu; Catherine Maroney; Corey A Morrison; Diane E Meier
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Care Arrangements of Older Adults: What They Prefer, What They Have, and Implications for Quality of Life.

Authors:  Judith D Kasper; Jennifer L Wolff; Maureen Skehan
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2019-09-17

5.  The Accuracy of Nurses' Predictions for Clinical Outcomes in the Chronically Critically Ill.

Authors:  Amy R Lipson; Sarah J Miano; Barbara J Daly; Sara L Douglas
Journal:  Res Rev J Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2017-07-25

6.  Practice of end-of-life care for patients with advanced dementia by hospital physicians and nurses: Comparison between medical and surgical wards.

Authors:  Meira Erel; Esther-Lee Marcus; Freda Dekeyser-Ganz
Journal:  Dementia (London)       Date:  2022-03-28

7.  Better informing decision making with multiple outcomes cost-effectiveness analysis under uncertainty in cost-disutility space.

Authors:  Nikki McCaffrey; Meera Agar; Janeane Harlum; Jonathon Karnon; David Currow; Simon Eckermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Influences on Care Preferences of Older People with Advanced Illness: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.

Authors:  Simon N Etkind; Anna E Bone; Natasha Lovell; Irene J Higginson; Fliss E M Murtagh
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Caring for frail older people in the last phase of life - the general practitioners' view.

Authors:  Karin Geiger; Nils Schneider; Jutta Bleidorn; Katharina Klindtworth; Saskia Jünger; Gabriele Müller-Mundt
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 10.  Nursing research priorities based on CINAHL database: A scoping review.

Authors:  Hanna Hopia; Johanna Heikkilä
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.