W Gómez1, E Sales, R T Lopes, W C A Pereira. 1. Technology Information Laboratory, Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute, Ciudad Victoria, 87130 Tamaulipas, Mexico. wgomez@tamps.cinvestav.mx
Abstract
PURPOSE: This paper presents a comparative study of automatic thresholding algorithms for segmenting trabecular bone volume in x-ray microtomography (μCT). METHODS: First, a preprocessing stage was established, which considered noise reduction by applying anisotropic diffusion filtering and contrast enhancement by using morphological top-hats. Next, four automatic thresholding algorithms were implemented: clustering, maximum entropy, moment preservation, and concavity-based. These approaches analyze the preprocessed 3D μCT image histogram to optimize some parameters to find the best gray-level threshold. Thirty-eight vertebra bone samples were acquired from 19 normal Wistar rats, specifically the L3 and L4 vertebrae. The μCT images were acquired with a microfocus x-ray device at 100 slices/sample. Next, three human operators segmented the entire 3D μCT images manually to establish ground-truth segmentations so as to associate the segmentation problem with perceptual grouping. The normalized probabilistic Rand index (NPRI) was used to quantify the agreement between each computerized segmentation and the corresponding set of three ground-truth segmentations. Hence, the NPRI value should tend toward unity for an acceptable performance. Finally, a statistical analysis was done to determine which thresholding approach achieved the best performance. Besides, 3D morphometric indices were also measured. RESULTS: The Games-Howell test (α = 0.05) was used to compare the equality of means from the NPRI results considering the four thresholding algorithms (multiple comparisons). This statistical analysis indicated that the clustering and moment preservation techniques performed similarly, with NPRI values of 0.594 ± 0.126 and 0.607 ± 0.127, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The main advantage of computerized segmentation is that it is fully automatic; that is, no interaction with the user is required. Thus, the method could be considered objective. Besides, the proposed preprocessing stage plays an important role in enhancing the μCT image quality to achieve better separation between the background volume and the trabecular bone volume.
PURPOSE: This paper presents a comparative study of automatic thresholding algorithms for segmenting trabecular bone volume in x-ray microtomography (μCT). METHODS: First, a preprocessing stage was established, which considered noise reduction by applying anisotropic diffusion filtering and contrast enhancement by using morphological top-hats. Next, four automatic thresholding algorithms were implemented: clustering, maximum entropy, moment preservation, and concavity-based. These approaches analyze the preprocessed 3D μCT image histogram to optimize some parameters to find the best gray-level threshold. Thirty-eight vertebra bone samples were acquired from 19 normal Wistar rats, specifically the L3 and L4 vertebrae. The μCT images were acquired with a microfocus x-ray device at 100 slices/sample. Next, three human operators segmented the entire 3D μCT images manually to establish ground-truth segmentations so as to associate the segmentation problem with perceptual grouping. The normalized probabilistic Rand index (NPRI) was used to quantify the agreement between each computerized segmentation and the corresponding set of three ground-truth segmentations. Hence, the NPRI value should tend toward unity for an acceptable performance. Finally, a statistical analysis was done to determine which thresholding approach achieved the best performance. Besides, 3D morphometric indices were also measured. RESULTS: The Games-Howell test (α = 0.05) was used to compare the equality of means from the NPRI results considering the four thresholding algorithms (multiple comparisons). This statistical analysis indicated that the clustering and moment preservation techniques performed similarly, with NPRI values of 0.594 ± 0.126 and 0.607 ± 0.127, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The main advantage of computerized segmentation is that it is fully automatic; that is, no interaction with the user is required. Thus, the method could be considered objective. Besides, the proposed preprocessing stage plays an important role in enhancing the μCT image quality to achieve better separation between the background volume and the trabecular bone volume.