| Literature DB >> 24006899 |
Masaki Nagata1, Arhab A Noman, Kenji Suzuki, Hiroshi Kurita, Makoto Ohnishi, Tokio Ohyama, Nobutaka Kitamura, Takanori Kobayashi, Kohya Uematsu, Katsu Takahashi, Naoki Kodama, Tomoyuki Kawase, Hideyuki Hoshina, Nobuyuki Ikeda, Susumu Shingaki, Ritsuo Takagi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Molecular biomarkers are essential for monitoring treatment effects, predicting prognosis, and improving survival rate in oral squamous cell carcinoma. This study sought to verify the effectiveness of two integrin gene expression ratios as biomarkers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24006899 PMCID: PMC3844399 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-410
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Clinicopathological data of 270 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
| | Total | 270 |
| Observation period (days) | 61-2182 (average, 1253.79) | |
| Age (years) | 21 - 92 (average, 66.70) | |
| Sex | Male | 166 (61.48) |
| | Female | 104 (38.52) |
| Tumor size (mm)1 | 5-60 (average, 26.63) | |
| | ≤20 | 86 (31.85) |
| | 21-30 | 97 (35.93) |
| | 31-40 | 62 (22.96) |
| | >40 | 25 (9.26) |
| Tumor status2 | T1 | 83 (30.74) |
| | T2 | 123 (45.56) |
| | T3 | 5 (1.85) |
| | T4 | 59 (21.85) |
| Lymph node metastasis3 | pN0 | 149 (55.19) |
| | pN1 | 41 (15.18) |
| | pN2 | 80 (29.63) |
| | pN3 | 0 (0) |
| Histologic grade (YK4)4 | 1-3 | 115 (42.59) |
| | 4c-d | 155 (57.41) |
| Surgical margin5 | Negative | 244 (90.37) |
| | Positive | 26 (9.63) |
| Primary site recurrence | Negative | 240 (88.89) |
| | Positive | 30 (11.11) |
| Distant metastasis | Negative | 256 (94.81) |
| | Positive | 14 (5.19) |
| Death outcome6 | Alive | 233 (86.30) |
| Dead | 37 (13.70) |
1Major width of the tumor. 2Tumor (T) category according to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification of malignant tumors of the lip and oral cavity. 3Lymph node (pN) category determined by pathologic examination of a surgical specimen, according to the UICC TNM classification of malignant tumors of the lip and oral cavity. 4Histopathologic classification of oral squamous cell carcinoma (YK grade) according to Yamamoto et al., 1983 (10). 5Histological tumor status of the surgical margin. 6Death outcome from uncontrollable oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Figure 1Histopathological categorization by mode of invasion[10]. Grade 1: well-defined borderline along the basal layer of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Grade 2: less-marked borderline with occasional growth of SCC cell groups. Grade 3: invasive growth of SCC cell groups with no distinct borderline. Grade 4c: diffuse invasion of cord-like SCC cells. Grade 4d: diffuse invasion of a single SCC cell or a few SCC cells in the deeper portion. Grade 1, 2, and 3 were categorized to YK4 negative (YK4-), and Grade 4c and 4d to YK4 positive (YK4+).
Logrank test (Mantel-Cox)
| | | | | |
| High-ITGA3/CD9 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| High-ITGB4/JUP | 0.022 | 0.237 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| | ||||
| Age1 | 0.449 | 0.321 | 0.207 | 0.365 |
| Sex | 0.417 | 0.858 | 0.149 | 0.584 |
| Size2 | 0.000 | 0.007 | 0.703 | 0.084 |
| T3-43 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.390 | 0.092 |
| YK44 | 0.000 | 0.018 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Positive margin5 | ------ | 0.000 | 0.427 | 0.000 |
| | ||||
| Lymph node metastasis6 | ------ | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Primary site recurrence | ------ | ------ | 0.840 | 0.000 |
| Distant metastasis | ------ | ------ | ------ | 0.000 |
Numbers in the table show P-values for the parameters. 1Age was categorized into two groups ≥69 and <69 based on the median age. 2Major width of the tumor was categorized into >30 mm and ≤30 mm. 3 T3 to T4 of tumor (T) category according to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification of malignant tumors of the lip and oral cavity. 44c or 4d of the histopathologic classification of oral squamous cell carcinoma according to Yamamoto et al., 1983 (10). 5Histological tumor positive of the surgical margin. 6Determined by pathologic examination of a surgical specimen. 7Death outcome from oral squamous cell carcinoma. Continuous variables of gene expression ratios are categorized according to the cut off points introduced by receiver operating characteristic curves. Median of ITGA3/CD9 and higher 30% group of ITGB4/JUP are used for categorization.
Cox proportional hazards model
| Variable | B | SE | Wald | OR | 95% CI for OR | ||
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||
| High-ITGA3/CD9 | 1.063 | 0.203 | 27.545 | 0.000 | 2.896 | 1.947 | 4.307 |
| YK41 | 0.961 | 0.216 | 19.887 | 0.000 | 2.614 | 1.714 | 3.989 |
| Size2 | 0.622 | 0.186 | 11.126 | 0.001 | 1.862 | 1.292 | 2.684 |
| Variable | B | SE | Wald | OR | 95% CI for OR | ||
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||
| High-ITGA3/CD9 | 1.090 | 0.415 | 6.895 | 0.009 | 2.973 | 1.318 | 6.706 |
| T3-43 | 0.955 | 0.387 | 6.088 | 0.014 | 2.597 | 1.217 | 5.544 |
| Positive margin4 | 1.715 | 0.402 | 18.183 | 0.000 | 5.556 | 2.526 | 12.221 |
| Variable | B | SE | Wald | OR | 95% CI for OR | ||
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||
| High-ITGB4/JUP | 2.311 | 0.771 | 8.990 | 0.003 | 10.088 | 2.227 | 45.704 |
| High-ITGA3/CD9 | 2.108 | 1.047 | 4.051 | 0.044 | 8.233 | 1.057 | 64.135 |
| Variable | B | SE | Wald | OR | 95% CI for OR | ||
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||
| High-ITGA3/CD9 | 1.618 | 0.450 | 12.947 | 0.000 | 5.041 | 2.089 | 12.166 |
| YK4 | 2.355 | 0.613 | 14.743 | 0.000 | 10.540 | 3.168 | 35.074 |
| Positive margin | 1.906 | 0.398 | 22.954 | 0.000 | 6.725 | 3.084 | 14.665 |
Cox Proportional Hazards Model for the risks of lymph node metastasis, primary site recurrence, distant metastasis, and OSCC death. 14c or 4d of the histopathologic classification of oral squamous cell carcinoma according to Yamamoto et al., 1983 (10). 2Major width of the tumor was categorized into >30 mm and ≤30 mm. 3 T3 to T4 of tumor (T) category according to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification of malignant tumors of the lip and oral cavity. 4Histological tumor positive of the surgical margin. 5Death outcome from uncontrollable oral squamous cell carcinoma. Continuous variables of gene expression ratios are categorized according to the cut off points introduced by receiver operating characteristic curves. Median of ITGA3/CD9 and higher 30% group of ITGB4/JUP are used for categorization. B, regression coefficient; SE, standard error; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival curves for 270 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Lymph node metastasis (a), primary site recurrence (b), distant metastasis (c), and disease-specific survival (d). Each consequence was stratified by a clinical event which effectively demonstrated influence of the factors. (a)-(c): Curves show 1 minus cumulative survival. (d): Curve shows cumulative survival.
Figure 3A hypothetical biomarker-oriented individualization of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) treatment based on the early diagnosis of OSCC malignancy type.