Literature DB >> 24006345

Economic design in a long-distance migrating molluscivore: how fast-fuelling red knots in Bohai Bay, China, get away with small gizzards.

Hong-Yan Yang1, Bing Chen, Zhi-Jun Ma, Ning Hua, Jan A van Gils, Zheng-Wang Zhang, Theunis Piersma.   

Abstract

We carried out an observational and experimental study to decipher how resource characteristics, in interaction with the predator's phenotype, constrain a fitness-determining performance measure, i.e. refuelling in a migrant bird. Two subspecies of red knot (Calidris canutus rogersi and C. c. piersmai) use northern Bohai Bay, Yellow Sea, China, for the final prebreeding stopover, during their 10,000-15,000 km long migrations between wintering and breeding areas. Here, they feed on small bivalves, especially 2-7 mm long Potamocorbula laevis. With an average stay of 29 days, and the need to store 80 g of fat for the onward flights to high-Arctic breeding grounds, red knots need to refuel fast. Using existing knowledge, we expected them to achieve this on the basis of (1) prey with high flesh to shell mass ratios, (2) large gizzards to crush the ingested molluscs, or (3) a combination of the two. Rejecting all three predictions, we found that red knots staging in Bohai Bay had the smallest gizzards on record (4.9 ± 0.8 g, mean ± s.e.m., N = 27), and also found that prey quality of P. laevis is much lower than predicted for the measured gizzard size (i.e. 1.3 rather than the predicted 4.5 kJ g(-1) dry shell mass, DM(shell)). The estimated handling time of P. laevis (0.2 s) is much shorter than the observed time between two prey ingestions (0.7 s), indicating that prey handling time is no constraint. Based on field observations of dropping rates and on indoor digestion trails, the shell processing rate was estimated at 3.9 mg DM(shell) s(-1), i.e. three times higher the rate previously predicted for red knots eating as fast as they can with the measured gizzard size. This is explained by the small and easily crushed P. laevis enabling high processing rates. As P. laevis also occurred in high densities, the metabolizable energy intake rate of red knots with small gizzards at 5 J s(-1) was as high as at northward staging sites elsewhere in the world. Currently, therefore, food characteristics in Bohai Bay are such that red knots can refuel fast whilst economizing on the size of their gizzard. These time-stressed migrants thus provide an elegant example of symmorphosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Yellow Sea; diet; digestive constraint; energy intake rate; intertidal mudflats; safety factors; symmorphosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24006345     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.083576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

1.  Spare capacity and phenotypic flexibility in the digestive system of a migratory bird: defining the limits of animal design.

Authors:  Scott R McWilliams; William H Karasov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Prey type and foraging ecology of Sanderlings Calidris alba in different climate zones: are tropical areas more favourable than temperate sites?

Authors:  Kirsten Grond; Yaa Ntiamoa-Baidu; Theunis Piersma; Jeroen Reneerkens
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Numerical Response of Migratory Shorebirds to Prey Distribution in a Large Temperate Arid Wetland, China.

Authors:  Yamian Zhang; Yi Zhu; Aojie Zuo; Li Wen; Guangchun Lei
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-12-13

4.  The Effect of Digestive Capacity on the Intake Rate of Toxic and Non-Toxic Prey in an Ecological Context.

Authors:  Thomas Oudman; Vincent Hin; Anne Dekinga; Jan A van Gils
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Habitat-dependent changes in vigilance behaviour of Red-crowned Crane influenced by wildlife tourism.

Authors:  Donglai Li; Yu Liu; Xinghai Sun; Huw Lloyd; Shuyu Zhu; Shuyan Zhang; Dongmei Wan; Zhengwang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.