Circulating specific biomarkers in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and its metastasis monitoring.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and rapidly fatal malignancies worldwide with a multifactorial, multistep, complex process and poor prognosis. Its early diagnosis and metastasis monitoring are of the utmost importance. Hepatoma tissues synthesize various tumor-related proteins, genes, enzymes, microRNA, etc. and then secrete into the blood. Detections of circulating biomarkers are useful to find tumor at an early stage or monitor metastasis after postoperative treatment. This paper summarizes recent studies of specific biomarkers at early diagnosis or in monitoring metastasis or postoperative recurrence of HCC.

Introduction

<span class="Disease">Hepatocellular carcinoma (<span class="Gene">HCC) is the third deadliest and fifth most common cancer worldwide [1, 2]. HCC ranks the second in China among all malignancies, and its mortality is almost equal to its morbidity. Carcinogenesis of HCC is a multifactor, multistep, complex process, which is associated with a background of chronic liver diseases or persistent infection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), along with alcohol and aflatoxin B1 intake which are widely recognized etiological agents in HCC [3, 4]. However, the underlying mechanisms that lead to malignant transformation of infected cells remain unclear. Most of HCC patients died quickly because of the rapid tumor progression, and hepatic resection or transplantation is the only potential curative treatment for HCC patients [5]. Although the mortality of HCC has significantly decreased with the development of surgical techniques, about 60~100 % of the patients suffered from HCC recurrence ultimately even after curative resection, and it has become the most important factor that limits the long-term survival of HCC patients [6].

The most urgent needs are to find sensitive markers for early diagnosis or monitor postope<span class="Species">rative recurrence and to give adequate treat<span class="Species">ment for HCC. It has many characteristics, such as fast infiltrating growth, metastasis in early stage, high-grade malignancy, and poorly therapeutic efficacy, with the prognosis that is poor and early detection that is of the utmost importance [7]. Although serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level is a useful tumor marker for the detection and monitoring of HCC, the false negative rate with AFP level alone may be as high as 40 % for patients with early stage HCC. Even in patients with advanced HCC, the AFP levels may remain normal in 15~30 % of the patients [8]. New specific markers [9, 10], such as circulating HCC-specific gamma-glutamyltransferase (HS-GGT) [5], HCC-specific AFP (HS-AFP or AFP-L3) [11, 12], microRNA (miRNA) [13], glypican-3 (GPC-3) [14], and Golgi glycoprotein 73 [15, 16], have been developed to improve the sensitivity, specificity, early detection, and prediction of prognosis. However, the overall results have been unsatisfactory [17, 18]. The present article summarizes recent studies of the specific molecular markers in early diagnosis and monitoring metastasis or postoperative recurrence of HCC.

Hepatoma-specific AFP and AFP-messenger RNA

<span class="Gene">AFP, a 70-kD glycoprotein synthesized from the fetal yolk sac, liver, and intestines, has a half-life of 5~7 days. Total serum <span class="Gene">AFP level is a prognostic indicator of the response and survival of germ cell tumors [19]. However, when an AFP level is slightly elevated, it may be falsely elevated owing to nonneoplastic liver disease [20]. Although total AFP is a useful serological marker for HCC diagnosis, the false negative rate or false positive rate with AFP level alone may be as high as 40 %, especially for its early diagnosis or the finding of small size HCC (<2 cm). It is sometimes very difficult to make the distinction between tumors and falsely elevated AFP levels because of benign liver diseases (Fig. 1a, b) [21]. Recently, the separation of a HS-AFP subfraction has been reported to be superior to total AFP level in both sensitivity and specificity in differentiating between benign and malignant liver diseases [22].

Fig. 1

Immunohistochemical staining of hepatic AFP expression and molecular features in HCC. a AFP in HCC tissues (SP, ×400). b AFP in precancerous tissue (SP, ×400). c AFP isoelectric point (pI) from different tissues. d The separation of AFP-L3 by a mini-column chromatography

Immunohistochemical staining of hepatic <span class="Gene">AFP expression and molecular features in <span class="Gene">HCC. a AFP in HCC tissues (SP, ×400). b AFP in precancerous tissue (SP, ×400). c AFP isoelectric point (pI) from different tissues. d The separation of AFP-L3 by a mini-column chromatography

Total <span class="Gene">AFP can be divided into three different glycoforms (Fig. 1c), <span class="Gene">AFP-L1, AFP-L2, and AFP-L3 (Fig. 1d), according to their binding capacity for lens culinaris agglutinin (LCA) or their isoelectric point difference. HS-AFP, as the LCA-bound fraction, is the major glycoform of AFP in the sera of HCC patients. Early diagnosis is very important for HCC. With a HS-AFP of more than 15 %, the levels of serum AFP and HS-AFP in HCC were significantly higher than those in other liver diseases [23]. Although total AFP level in liver cirrhosis was significantly higher than that in chronic hepatitis or normal control, no significant relationship was found between the percentage of HS-AFP and total AFP level, HBsAg-positive or HBsAg-negative status, tumor size, or number. However, there was a relationship with HCC differentiation, metastasis, and relapse, suggesting that the percentage of HS-AFP may be a more specific marker than total AFP for early diagnosis and recurrence of HCC [24-26].

The genetic markers or <span class="Disease">tumor-specific protein can monitor <span class="Disease">carcinogenesis of hepatocytes and can diagnose HCC at an early stage of HCC development. Angiogenesis is necessary for solid tumors larger than 1 × 1 mm; otherwise, the tumor remains dormant and does not metastasize [25]. As soon as it enters the angiogenesis stage, metastasis potency is exhibited. AFP messenger RNA (mRNA) from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been most extensively studied in recent years (Fig. 2). Using the appropriate single tumor marker or combination of other markers may improve the effectiveness in screening HCC patients [27, 28]. If HCC-specific mRNAs are detected in the circulating blood, it is possible to infer the presence of circulating, presumably malignant liver cells and to predict the likelihood of hematogenous metastasis. By now, many clinical, tumor genetic and molecular biological markers have been used to diagnose HCC or to predict HCC recurrence, but it is a frequently encountered situation that different conclusions were drawn from different researches concerning the value of the same predictor. As circulating cancer cells are an important source for HCC metastasis, the biomarkers that indicate the malignant cell existence may be a useful predictor for HCC extrahepatic metastasis [29, 30].

Fig. 2

Amplification of AFP messenger RNA (mRNA) from the livers or PBMCs and the alignment of amplified sequences. a The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) genome were used as a control. b The amplification of AFP genomes. Lanes 1 and 2 indicate positive AFP fragments from HCC tissues; 3, positive AFP fragments from paracancerous tissue; 4, negative result from noncancerous tissue; 5 and 6, negative result from circulating PBMCs of patients with liver cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis. c The limitation for AFP mRNA analysis was 2 ng/L in the detection system. d Alignment of nucleotide sequences of the amplified fragments of AFP genome in hepatoma or PBMCs from HCC patients. Origin: the cited sequence of AFP genome; Hepatoma: hepatoma tissue; PBMCs: blood from HCC patient

Amplification of <span class="Gene">AFP messenger RNA (mRNA) from the livers or PBMCs and the alignment of amplified sequences. a The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) genome were used as a control. b The amplification of AFP genomes. Lanes 1 and 2 indicate positive AFP fragments from HCC tissues; 3, positive AFP fragments from paracancerous tissue; 4, negative result from noncancerous tissue; 5 and 6, negative result from circulating PBMCs of patients with liver cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis. c The limitation for AFP mRNA analysis was 2 ng/L in the detection system. d Alignment of nucleotide sequences of the amplified fragments of AFP genome in hepatoma or PBMCs from HCC patients. Origin: the cited sequence of AFP genome; Hepatoma: hepatoma tissue; PBMCs: blood from HCC patient

HS-GGT isoforms

GGT (Enzyme Commission number 2.3.2.2) is a membrane-bound enzyme that catalyzes the degradation of <span class="Chemical">glutathione and other gamma-glutamyl compounds by hydrolysis of the gamma-glutamyl moiety or by its transfer to a suitable acceptor [31, 32]. This enzyme exhibits a tissue-specific expression that is modified under various physiologic and pathologic conditions, such as development and carcinogenesis. It is highest in the embryo livers and decreases rapidly to the lowest levels after birth, and it is a widely distributed enzyme that has been extensively studied in relation to hepatocarcinogenesis. GGT is a heterodimeric glycoprotein [33, 34], and its total activity in patients with liver diseases and extrahepatic tumors was abnormally increased. Several studies have demonstrated that these increases are often associated with structural changes of its sugar chains, as evidenced by a variation in the pattern of serum GGT isoforms, suggesting that evaluations of GGT multiple forms might improve the specificity of GGT measurement and that there might be a correlation between specific patterns and different disease states [35, 36].

GGT is re-expressed during the <span class="Gene">HCC development and can be divided into several subfractions according to different electrophoresis mobility. HS-GGT bands (including I′, II, and II′) in sera of HCC patients can be separated by a vertical slab electrophoresis assay of polyacrylamide stage gradient gel and have been used in HCC diagnosis [37, 38]. Hepatic GGT with alteration of the gene methylation status is re-expressed during the HCC development. HS-GGT is a part of total GGT activity that can only be found in sera of HCC patients and has been confirmed as a useful specific molecular marker, and its analysis may improve the specificity and sensitivity of HCC diagnosis. The circulating HS-GGT activity was significantly elevated in the HCC patients with an incidence of 86 % at the level of over 5.5 IU/L and in patients with other liver diseases with an incidence of <3 % (Fig. 3) [39].

Fig. 3

Diagnostic values of circulating HS-GGT activities in sera of patients with liver diseases or extrahepatic tumors. AH acute hepatitis, CH chronic hepatitis, LC liver cirrhosis, ET extrahepatic tumor, NC normal controls

Diagnostic values of circulating HS-GGT activities in sera of <span class="Species">patients with <span class="Disease">liver diseases or extrahepatic tumors. AH acute hepatitis, CH chronic hepatitis, LC liver cirrhosis, ET extrahepatic tumor, NC normal controls

From <span class="Disease">cancer to non<span class="Disease">cancerous tissues, an increasing tendency of total RNA expression was found [40, 41]. The frequencies of the amplified fragment and the hypomethylated M3 site of GGT genes were 100 and 75 % in HCC tissues, 85 and 55 % in paracancerous tissues, and 75 and 50 % in noncancerous tissues, respectively. An inverse correlation was found between methylational degrees of GGT genes and GGT levels. The abnormal alteration of serum HS-GGT level is a sensitive tumor marker for diagnosis or differentiation of HCC, and its overexpression in HCC may be related to the gene hypomethylational status of CCGG sites [39].

According to the greatest <span class="Gene">HCC di<span class="Species">mension, there are two groups of patients: <5 cm and >5 cm. The diagnostic values of AFP and HS-GGT levels were 42 % in AFP and 76 % in HS-GGT for small size HCC and 83 % in AFP and 92 % in HS-GGT for large size HCC, respectively. The abnormal frequency in the <5 cm group was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in HS-GGT than that in AFP. A significant correlation was found between AFP levels and tumor size (P < 0.01). According to AFP levels (<50, 51~499, 500~999, and >1,000 ng/mL), the frequency of HS-GGT activity >5.5 IU/mL in HCC was 79.6, 96.4, 88.9, and 86.9 %, respectively. The HS-GGT positive rate was 79.6 or 89.7 % in the AFP <50 or >50 ng/mL group. No significant relation was found between AFP level and HS-GGT activity. However, the positive AFP could be found in HCC with low HS-GGT levels. A comparative analysis of HS-GGT and AFP markers for HCC diagnosis is shown in Table 1. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive or negative predictive value, and accuracy of HS-GGT quantitative analysis in HCC diagnosis were superior to the same values for AFP marker [39].

Table 1

Relation between AFP levels and HS-GGT activities

AFP (ng/mL)	No.	HS-GGT (>5.5 IU/L)
		Positive (%)	Negative (%)
<50	49	39 (79.6)	10 (20.4)
51~499	28	27 (96.4)	1 (3.6)
500~999	18	16 (88.9)	2 (11.1)
>1,000	61	53 (86.9)	8 (13.1)
Total	156	135 (86.5)	21 (13.5)

HS-GGT hepatoma specific γ-glutamyltransferase, AFP alpha-fetoprotein

Relation between <span class="Gene">AFP levels and HS-GGT activities

HS-GGT hepatoma specific γ-glutamyltransferase, <span class="Gene">AFP alpha-fetoprotein

Glypican-3 and its gene transcription

<span class="Gene">GPC-3 is a membrane-anchored heparin sulfate proteoglycan normally expressed in the fetal liver and placenta, but not in the normal adult liver [42, 43]. It is an oncofetal antigen that is a reliable circulating biomarker for <span class="Gene">HCC and has not been observed in benign liver lesions by in situ hybridization or immunohistochemistry [44]. High-grade dysplastic nodules typically express GPC-3 in a weak and focal fashion, although the results have not been consistent across different series [45]. GPC-3 expression in hepatocarcinogenesis was previously investigated by rat HCC models, with the brown positive GPC-3 expression mainly distributed in cytosol, and membrane, with 100 % in precancerous or cancerous tissues, and was associated with hepatocyte malignant transformation that it is an early biomarker for HCC. The expression and distribution of liver GPC-3 analyzed by immunohistochemistry with anti-GPC-3 antibody are shown in Fig. 4. The positive GPC-3 expression showed brown particles and located in cytosol and cell membrane with only a few in cellular nuclei with its diffusely staining in cancerous tissues (Fig. 4a) significantly higher than that in their paracancerous or distal cancerous tissues (Fig. 4b), indicated that the positive GPC-3 was markedly increased with specific expression in HCC confirmed by Western blotting (Fig. 4c) [46].

Fig. 4

Immunohistochemical staining and Western blotting analysis of hepatoma GPC-3 expression. a The GPC-3-positive cytoplasm in cancerous tissues. b GPC-3 in positive cancerous or negative paracancerous tissues (SP, X 200). c The analysis of liver GPC-3 expression by Western blotting. Lanes 1–4 indicate liver tissues from HCC patients. HCC: the cancerous tissues; Para-can: their paracancerous tissues; Dis-can: their distal cancerous tissues

Immunohistochemical staining and Western blotting analysis of <span class="Disease">hepatoma <span class="Gene">GPC-3 expression. a The GPC-3-positive cytoplasm in cancerous tissues. b GPC-3 in positive cancerous or negative paracancerous tissues (SP, X 200). c The analysis of liver GPC-3 expression by Western blotting. Lanes 1–4 indicate liver tissues from HCC patients. HCC: the cancerous tissues; Para-can: their paracancerous tissues; Dis-can: their distal cancerous tissues

The incidence of <span class="Gene">GPC-3 expression in <span class="Gene">HCC group (80.6 %) was significantly higher than that in paracancerous or distal cancerous groups (P < 0.001), with the paracancerous group significantly higher than that in the distal cancerous group (P < 0.001). The clinicopathological characteristics demonstrated that no significant difference was found between GPC-3 intensity and differentiation degree, age, gender, tumor number, and AFP levels except that between tumor size (>3 vs. <3 cm, P < 0.05) and HBV infection (Table 2). The fragment of GPC-3 mRNA in PBMCs and cancerous and paracancerous tissues can be amplified and confirmed by sequencing, but not in distal cancerous tissues or PBMCs from cases with benign liver diseases [43, 47].

Table 2

The pathological characteristics of circulating GPC-3 mRNA in PBMCs from HCC patients

Group	No. of cases	GPC-3		χ2	P
		Positive	Negative
Sex
Male	103	74	29	0.379	0.538
Female	20	13	7
Age
≥60 years	56	39	17	0.059	0.808
<60 years	67	48	19
TNM staging
I and II	47	39	8	5.551	0.019
III and IV	76	48	28
Tumor size
≥3.0 cm	98	65	33	4.520	0.034
<3.0 cm	25	22	3
AFP (ng/mL)
≥400	52	36	16	0.098	0.754
<400	71	51	20
HBsAg
Positive	89	79	10	50.571	<0.001
Negative	34	8	26
Tumor number
Single	58	40	18	0.165	0.685
Multiple	65	47	18
Child-Pugh
A	60	40	20	1.005	0.605
B	45	34	11
C	18	13	5
Periportal cancer embolus
With	44	44	0	28.347	<0.001
Without	79	43	36
Extrahepatic metastasis
With	65	65	0	57.019	<0.001
Without	58	22	36

The pathological characteristics of circulating <span class="Gene">GPC-3 mRNA in PBMCs from <span class="Gene">HCC patients

The incidence of circulating <span class="Gene">GPC-3 mRNA was 70.7 % in <span class="Gene">HCC and 2.0 % in cases with benign liver diseases or non-liver tumors. The significant higher incidence of GPC-3 mRNA was found in HCC patients with I and II vs. III and IV staging, HBV infection, and small size tumor, especially in HCC patients with the periportal cancer embolus or the extra-hepatic metastasis group higher than that the without periportal cancer embolus or extrahepatic metastasis group (Table 2) [48, 49]. The quantitative GPC-3 levels showed that only GPC-3 was overexpressed in HCC (52.8 %) and 1.4 % in cases with benign liver diseases or 2.0 % in non-liver tumors, with significant differences between the HCC group and each of the study groups. The non-GPC-3 expression in sera of cases with benign liver diseases was detected except of one case with cirrhosis. There were no false positives among patients with acute or chronic hepatitis or among healthy subjects. However, in compared with AFP for HCC diagnosis, the higher positive result (up to 20.0 %) of AFP could be found in benign liver diseases, although the AFP positive rate was higher (70.73 %). According to tumor size, the abnormal frequency of serum GPC-3 was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in the <3 cm group (80.0 %) than that in the >3 cm group (41.7 %).

The combining diagnostic values of circulating <span class="Gene">GPC-3, <span class="Gene">GPC-3 mRNA, and AFP levels for HCC are shown in Table 3. The positive rate in 123 HCC patients was 52.8 % in serum GPC-3, 70.7 % in positive GPC-3 mRNA from circulating PBMC, and 70.7 % in AFP. Total positive rates of circulating GPC-3 and its gene in combination with AFP could rise up to 94.3 % for HCC diagnosis. The detecting GPC-3 and GPC-3 mRNA were superior to AFP in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive or negative predictive value, and accuracy for HCC. The detection of circulating GPC-3 or its gene transcription in HCC specificity was superior to serum AFP alone, with efficacious in HCC differentiating diagnosis or monitoring hematogenous metastasis. Both combining applications of GPC-3 and AFP should rise up the HCC diagnostic sensitivity [50].

Table 3

Combining diagnostic values of circulating GPC-3, GPC-3 mRNA, and AFP levels for HCC

	GPC-3	GPC-3 mRNA	AFPa	Total
Sensitivity (%)	52.8	70.7	70.7	94.3
Specificity (%)	98.8	99.8	86.2	85.8
Diagnostic accuracy (%)	83.5	89.4	81.0	88.6
Positive predictive value (%)	95.6	96.7	71.9	76.8
Negative predictive value (%)	80.7	87.1	85.5	96.8

aAFP level was more than 20 ng/mL

Combining diagnostic values of circulating <span class="Gene">GPC-3, <span class="Gene">GPC-3 mRNA, and AFP levels for HCC

a<span class="Gene">AFP level was more than 20 ng/mL

Transforming growth factor-β1 and its mRNA

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β is a family of related proteins that regulate many cellular processes including growth, differentiation, extracellular matrix formation, and immunosuppressant [51]. Every cell in the body, including epithelial, endothelial, hematopoietic, neuronal, and connective tissue cells, produces TGF-β and has receptors for it. TGF-β1 is one of TGF-β isoforms (TGF-β1–5) and arrests the cell cycle in the G1 phase, thereof eliciting inhibition of cell prolife<span class="Species">ration and triggering apoptosis [52, 53]. In normal liver tissues, TGF-β1 is produced only by nonparenchymal cells (Kupffer's cell, fat storing cell, and endothelial cell). Previous studies have shown upregulated expression of TGF-β1 in <span class="Disease">tumor cells, including HCC. Though a growth inhibitor, the overexpression of hepatic TGF-β1 was found in HCC tissues and correlated with carcinogenesis, progression, and prognosis of HCC [3, 54, 55]. TGF-β1 expression was increased as the HBV-induced disease progressed from chronic liver diseases to cirrhosis and then to HCC. In in vitro study, immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization revealed that normal hepatocytes had not any TGF-β1 staining [56, 57], but hepatocytes in regenerative and cirrhotic livers and HCC cells expressed different degrees of TGF-β1 and its mRNA.

As the longevity of <span class="Disease">liver cirrhosis and <span class="Gene">HCC cells was observed compared to normal hepatocytes, it is plausible to propose that TGF-β1 up-expression in these tumor cells is closely related to the cell survival, thereof possibly escaping the control of cell proliferation by TGF-β [58]. The incidence of hepatic TGF-β1 expression was higher in HCC (83 %) and lower in their surrounding tissues, and the incidence was 95 % in positive HBV-DNA group and 64 % in negative HBV-DNA one, respectively. TGF-β1 expression is associated with HCC differentiation degree and status of HBV replication, but neither to tumor size nor to number. The levels of circulating TGF-β1 and TGF-β1 mRNA were significantly higher in HCC than those in any of other patients. Sensitivity or specificity of circulating TGF-β1 level (>1.2 μg/L) was 90 or 94 % for HCC diagnosis, but no significant correlation was found between TGF-β1 and AFP expression or tumor sizes. Combining TGF-β1 and AFP could raise the positive rate up to 97 %. Both of circulating TGF-β1 and its mRNA could be used as sensitive biomarkers for the diagnosis or prognosis of HBV-induced HCC [59, 60].

Insulin-like growth factor-II and its mRNA

<span class="Gene">Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-II is a mitogenic polypeptide closely related to <span class="Gene">insulin, and its gene has a complex regulation of transcription, resulting in multiple mRNAs initiated by different promoters [61, 62]. IGF-II is speculated to serve as an autocrine growth factor in various cancers with increasing IGF-I receptor, and it is a kind of fetal growth factor, and highly abnormality in hepatocarcinogenesis and re-expression of its gene has recently been described in HCC [63, 64]. HCC is generally considered to be a hypervascular tumor. Although hepatic arterial embolization is widely used as an effective treatment of HCC on the basis of HCC hypervascularization, IGF-II may play an important role in the development of HCC neovascularization, because IGF-II substantially increases vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) at mRNA or protein levels in a time-dependent manner [63, 65].

<span class="Gene">HCC is a common <span class="Disease">malignant disease with poor prognosis. Underlying molecular mechanism provides a potential to develop new therapeutic target, which is very urgent. The induction of VEGF by IGF-II was additively increased by hypoxia, and IGF-II may be a hypoxia-inducible angiogenic factor in HCC and stimulates the growth of HCC cells in vitro. Most of cirrhotic and HCC tissues express IGF-II (Fig. 5). However, little is known of its circulating IGF-II gene in HCC [66, 67]. The positive frequencies of IGF-II mRNA were 100 % in HCC, half in paracancerous or none in noncancerous tissues, respectively. The circulating free IGF-II levels were significantly higher in HCC than those in chronic liver disease. IGF-II abnormally expressed during HCC development [65]. Recent studies revealed that circulating IGF-II mRNA correlated well with the presence of extrahepatic metastases in HCC patient. The role of IGF-II in HCC cell proliferation and antiapoptosis is well established. Specific and efficient miRNA inhibited the IGF-II expression for exploring the effect of IGF-II inhibition on the growth, as well as metastasis-related biological behaviors of HCC [68, 69].

Fig. 5

Expressions of liver IGF-II or its gene transcription and diagnostic value of circulating IGF-II. a IGF-II in distal cancerous tissues. b IGF-II in cancerous tissues. c IGF-II mRNA in HCC, paracancerous, and distal cancerous tissues. d The receiver operating characteristic curves of serum IGF-II in HCC with the area 0.823 for AFP and 0.771 for IGF-II

Expressions of liver <span class="Gene">IGF-II or its gene transcription and diagnostic value of circulating <span class="Gene">IGF-II. a IGF-II in distal cancerous tissues. b IGF-II in cancerous tissues. c IGF-II mRNA in HCC, paracancerous, and distal cancerous tissues. d The receiver operating characteristic curves of serum IGF-II in HCC with the area 0.823 for AFP and 0.771 for IGF-II

Genetic alterations of telomerase

Telomerase, an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, can maintain the telomeric length by acting as a reverse transcriptase. In <span class="Species">humans, <span class="Disease">tumor cells escape programmed cell senescence through reactivation of telomerase [70, 71]. These immortalized cells can compensate for telomeric shortening at each cell division, leading to progressive neoplastic evolution. Telomerase re-expression was found in 85 % of malignant tumors [72, 73]. Maybe HBV infection is merely a carcinogenic factor and is not related to the growth, infiltration, and metastasis of HCC. It is increasingly clear that oncogenesis is driven by telomerase activation, a ribonucleoprotein complex that adds telomeric repeats (hexa-nucleotide 5′-TTAGGG-3′) to the ends of replicating chromosomes. Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein composed of an essential RNA and a few proteins and is expressed in embryonic cell and in adult male germ line cells but undetected in normal somatic cells except proliferative cells of renewable tissues [74].

The expression of telomerase is important to cell prolife<span class="Species">ration, senescence, immortalization, and <span class="Disease">carcinogenesis. The hepatoma model displayed the dynamic expression of hepatic telomerase during HCC development and up to its highest peak at the stage of HCC formation. Its activities were consistent with liver total RNA levels at the stages of degeneration, precancerosis, and cancerization of hepatocytes. The telomerase levels in HCC tissues were also significantly higher than those in their adjacent noncancerous tissues, but liver total RNA levels were lower in the former than those in the latter. Although the circulating telomerase of HCC patients was abnormally expressed among cases with chronic liver diseases, its activity was a nonspecific marker for HCC diagnosis, because the incidence was lower in control or in chronic liver diseases and 83 % in HCC when absorbance was >0.2, respectively. If the value was >0.6, the incidence was 63 % in HCC and none in any of the others except for two cases with liver cirrhosis [46], with AFP detection increasing the accuracy (93 %) for HCC diagnosis, suggesting that telomerase expression was associated with HCC development, and its abnormality could be a useful marker for diagnosis and prognosis of HCC [75, 76].

Heat shock protein

<span class="Gene">Heat shock protein (<span class="Gene">HSP) is a highly conserved protein produced under the perturbation or stressors of many physical and chemical factors. It participates in the complex formation of many proteins, contributes to the folding and extension of proteins as well as the assembly of polycomplex, functions in protein transport between cell organelles, and regulates the target proteins other than changes of their construction [77, 78]. Thus, it is defined as a molecular chaperone. HSPs are ubiquitous molecules induced in cells exposed to various stress conditions, including carcinogenesis. Previous studies have shown an upregulated expression of gp96 in tumor cells as an apoptosis inhibitor, abnormal HSP correlated with carcinogenesis, progression, and prognosis of HCC. HSP gp96 (or GRP94) as a putative high-density lipoprotein-binding protein in the liver and a member of the HSP90 family (HSP83, HSP84, HSP87, HSP90 gp96, etc.) binds the repertoires of peptides, thus eliciting peptide-specific T cell immune responses. It predominantly locates inside the endoplasmic reticulum with some cell surface expression in certain cancerous cells. Enhancement of intracellular HSP is closely related to the formation and development of HCC [79] and a vital marker indicating the progression and aggravation of HCC [7, 80].

<span class="Gene">HSP90 is required for the activity of <span class="Species">HBV reverse transcriptase. The gp96 expression is increased as the HBV-induced disease progresses from chronic hepatitis to cirrhosis and then to HCC. The longevity of cirrhotic and HCC cells compared to normal hepatocytes is plausible to propose that increased gp96 expression in these tumor cells is closely related to the cell survival, thereof possibly by preventing cell apoptosis. The gp96 was strongly expressed in HCC (73.3 %) and was weakly expressed in noncancerous tissues, correlated with the degree of tumor differentiation or size, but not with tumor number. The data of immunohistochemical analysis showed that 90 % of HCC patients with positive HBV-DNA were strongly expressed for gp96, whereas only 46 % of the patients with HBV-DNA-negative were positive for gp96 [81].

<span class="Gene">HSP70 and <span class="Gene">HSP27 among HSPs are of special relevance in cancer, inhibiting apoptosis and frequently staining in the cytoplasm and nuclei of tumor cells, but not in nonneoplastic hepatocytes. Immunoreactivity of HSP70 or HSP27 was observed in 56.3 and 61.9 % of HCC; the former was correlated with high Ki-67-labeling indices (LIs), large tumor size, presence of portal vein invasion, and high tumor stage, and the latter was significantly related to the subgroup of HBV-associated HCCs, but not to others. Both HSP70 and HSP27 immunoreactivities showed no relation to Apotag LIs or p53 immunoreactivity. Expressions of HSP70 and HSP27 might play an important role in hepatocarcinogenesis, and HSP70, in particular, was closely related to the pathological parameters associated with HCC progression [82, 83].

Circulating microRNAs

miRNAs are small noncoding RNAs that function as endogenous silencers of numerous target genes [84, 85]. Hundreds of miRNAs have been identified in <span class="Species">human genome. miRNAs are expressed in a tissue-specific manner and play important roles in cell prolife<span class="Species">ration, apoptosis, and differentiation of HCC. Aberrant expression of miRNAs may also contribute to the development and progression of HCC, and miRNAs play roles as tumor suppressors or oncogenes. miR-122, let-7 family, and miR-101 are downregulated, and they are potential tumor suppressors of HCC. miR-221 and miR-222 are upregulated in HCC and may act as oncogenic miRNAs in hepatocarcinogenesis. miRNA expression profiling may be a powerful clinical tool for the diagnosis and regulation of miRNA expression which could be a novel therapeutic strategy for HCC [86, 87].

Many studies have shown that miRNAs play a crucial role in driving organ and tissue differentiation during embryogenesis and in the fine-tuning of funda<span class="Species">mental biological processes. The role of miRNAs in <span class="Gene">HCC is analyzed for exploring the possible mechanisms by which they contribute to this neoplasm. Moreover, the possible role of circulating miRNAs as biomarkers, a field that needs urgent improvement in the clinical surveillance of HCC, and the fascinating possibility of using them as therapeutic targets or drugs themselves [88] were also analyzed. Several miRNAs are involved in HBV or HCV replication and virus-induced changes, whereas others participate in multiple intracellular signaling pathways that modulate apoptosis, cell cycle checkpoints, and growth factor-stimulated responses. When disturbed, these pathways appear to result in malignant transformation and, ultimately, HCC development. It could also serve as indicators with respect to drug efficacy and be prognostic in HCC. Such biomarkers would assist in the stratification of HCC and help in direct personalized therapy [89].

Perspectives

<span class="Disease">Hepatoma has exhibited <span class="Disease">numerous genetic abnormalities as well as epigenetic alterations including modulation of DNA methylation [90, 91]. Molecular factors are involved in the process of HCC development and metastasis [92, 93]. Several laboratories have implicated constitutive activation of miRNA as one of the early key events involving in liver neoplastic progression [94, 95]. Further studies will permit us to analyze the mechanism of hepatocarcinogenesis and to pay attention to these areas [96]. However, the combination of pathological features and some biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity for early diagnosis and metastasis of HCC seems to be more practical up to present.