Literature DB >> 24006173

Human papillomavirus vaccination in adolescence.

Michelle Russell1, Vinita Raheja, Rotimi Jaiyesimi.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the third most common female cancer worldwide. It remains the highest ranking preventable cancer affecting women in developing countries. Cervical cancer is caused by sexual transmission of human papillomavirus (HPV). It is estimated that more than 80% of sexually active women will be infected with HPV in their lifetime, usually in their mid to late teens, 20s and early 30s. Persistence of high-risk oncogenic subtypes can lead to the development of precancerous change (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)), which can ultimately lead to cervical cancer. Progression from CIN to cancer is slow in most cases, and it is believed that progression from CIN 3 to cancer at 10, 20 and 30 years is 16%, 25% and 31.3%, respectively. The cervical screening programme has been successful in reducing the incidence of cervical cancer by recognising early precancerous changes and treating them. A promising advance in women's health has been the development of a vaccine targeting high-risk oncogenic subtypes 16 and 18, which are responsible for 70% of all cervical cancers. Two HPV vaccines are available: Merck & Co.'s Gardasil(®) and GlaxoSmithKline's Cervarix(®). The aim of this programme is to provide three doses prior to sexual debut with the hope that it will reduce the rates of cervical cancer in the future. Women who are already sexually active can still be vaccinated, but, the vaccine has been shown to be less effective in them. Uptake remains a challenge for public health, and efforts should focus on educating parents about the association between HPV and cervical cancer. Routine vaccination of young men is a debatable issue and has been found to be less cost-effective, as the burden of disease such as anal and penile cancers in males is less than cervical cancers in women. Current evidence suggests that the HPV vaccination programme should focus on increasing and maintaining high coverage of vaccination in girls. There may, however, be some benefit in vaccinating young men in areas where the uptake of vaccination in women in less than 70%. A school-based vaccination programme has been shown to be effective, with an uptake rate in England of 76% for 2009/2010, but this has implications for the role of school nurses in the delivery of other services. This article explores the health benefits of the HPV vaccine, the impact of attitudes, cost-effectiveness and the involvement of school nurses in programme delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV; bivalent vaccine; cervical cancer; quadrivalent vaccine; screening programme

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24006173     DOI: 10.1177/1757913913499091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Public Health        ISSN: 1757-9147


  4 in total

1.  Human papillomavirus-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine (cervarix®): a guide to its two-dose schedule in girls aged 9-14 years in the EU.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Facilitators and barriers of parental attitudes and beliefs toward school-located influenza vaccination in the United States: Systematic review.

Authors:  Gloria J Kang; Rachel K Culp; Kaja M Abbas
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Performance of 21 HPV vaccination programs implemented in low and middle-income countries, 2009-2013.

Authors:  Joël Ladner; Marie-Hélène Besson; Mariana Rodrigues; Etienne Audureau; Joseph Saba
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  School-based vaccination programmes: a systematic review of the evidence on organisation and delivery in high income countries.

Authors:  Sarah Perman; Simon Turner; Angus I G Ramsay; Abigail Baim-Lance; Martin Utley; Naomi J Fulop
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.