Literature DB >> 24006119

Suggestions from adolescents, young adults, and parents for improving informed consent in phase 1 pediatric oncology trials.

Justin N Baker1, Angela C Leek, Halle Showalter Salas, Dennis Drotar, Robert Noll, Susan R Rheingold, Eric D Kodish.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Informed consent for a pediatric oncology phase 1 trial is a delicate process, and is made more complex by the difficulty of the information and the requirement for parental consent, and patient assent when applicable. This analysis identifies suggestions for improving the informed consent process received from parents and adolescent and young adult patients (aged 14 years-21 years) who had the option of participating in a phase 1 pediatric oncology trial.
METHODS: A total of 57 parents and 20 patients completed interviews as part of a multisite, prospective, descriptive study. These transcribed interviews were studied using established content analysis methods.
RESULTS: Parent and patient responses contained 220 suggestions and 54 suggestions, respectively. A total of 21 unique suggestions for improvement emerged in 3 main themes: 1) provision of more information; 2) structure and presentation of the informed consent process, and 3) suggestions for physicians conducting the process. Common suggestions included providing more specific information about the trial, allowing more time for decision-making, and using different methods to deliver information.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants involved in the informed consent process for a phase 1 trial provided specific recommendations to research teams to enhance the process. Physician/investigators should be informed of these recommendations and develop and test interventions incorporating them.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescent; ethics; oncology; parent; pediatrics; phase 1; research; suggestion; young adult

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24006119     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  22 in total

1.  Attitudes of Mothers Regarding Willingness to Enroll Their Children in Research.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Maryam Rostami; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Practical communication guidance to improve phase 1 informed consent conversations and decision-making in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Liza-Marie Johnson; Angela C Leek; Dennis Drotar; Robert B Noll; Susan R Rheingold; Eric D Kodish; Justin N Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Decision-making in childhood cancer: parents' and adolescents' views and perceptions.

Authors:  Eden G Robertson; Claire E Wakefield; Joanne Shaw; Anne-Sophie Darlington; Brittany C McGill; Richard J Cohn; Joanna E Fardell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Communication preferences of pediatric cancer patients: talking about prognosis and their future life.

Authors:  Sarah R Brand; Karen Fasciano; Jennifer W Mack
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Contrasting views of risk perception and influence of financial compensation between adolescent research participants and their parents.

Authors:  Lori Wiener; Adrienne Viola; Benjamin S Wilfond; David Wendler; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 6.  Ethics of pharmacological research involving adolescents.

Authors:  Eva Welisch; Luis A Altamirano-Diaz
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 7.  Communication in pediatric oncology: State of the field and research agenda.

Authors:  Bryan A Sisk; Jennifer W Mack; Rachel Ashworth; James DuBois
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 8.  The complexity of consenting to clinical research in phase I pediatric cancer studies.

Authors:  Tal Schechter; Ronald Grant
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 9.  Approaches for Discussing Clinical Trials with Pediatric Oncology Patients and Their Families.

Authors:  Lindsay J Blazin; Andrea Cuviello; Holly Spraker-Perlman; Erica C Kaye
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Hope and persuasion by physicians during informed consent.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Melissa Cousino; Angela C Leek; Eric D Kodish
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.