Literature DB >> 24005643

The stages of extrication: a prospective study.

Tim Nutbeam1, Rob Fenwick2, Charles Hobson3, Vikki Holland4, Michael Palmer5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients will require extrication following a motor vehicle collision (MVC). Little information exists on the time taken for the various stages of extrication.
OBJECTIVE: To report the time taken for the various stages of extrication.
METHODS: A prospective, observational study carried out in the West Midland Fire Service's metropolitan area. Time points related to extrication were collected 'live' by two-way radio broadcast. Any missing data were actively gathered by fire control within 1 h of completion of extrication. This paper reports an interim analysis conducted after 1 year of data collection following a 3-month run-in and training period: data were analysed from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011 inclusive.
RESULTS: During the study period 228 incidents were identified. Seventy-nine were excluded as they met the predetermined exclusion criteria or had incomplete data collection. This left 158 extrications that were suitable for analysis. The median time for extrication was 30 min, IQR 24-38 min.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients requiring extrication following an MVC a median time of 8 min is typically required before initial limited patient assessment and intervention. A further 22 min is typically required before full extrication. Prehospital personnel should be aware of these times when planning their approach to a trapped patient. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24005643     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of the demographics, injury patterns and outcome data for patients injured in motor vehicle collisions who are trapped compared to those patients who are not trapped.

Authors:  Tim Nutbeam; Rob Fenwick; Jason Smith; Omar Bouamra; Lee Wallis; Willem Stassen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Maximum movement and cumulative movement (travel) to inform our understanding of secondary spinal cord injury and its application to collar use in self-extrication.

Authors:  Tim Nutbeam; Rob Fenwick; Barbara May; Willem Stassen; Jason Smith; James Shippen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Assessing spinal movement during four extrication methods: a biomechanical study using healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Tim Nutbeam; Rob Fenwick; Barbara May; Willem Stassen; Jason E Smith; Jono Bowdler; Lee Wallis; James Shippen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision.

Authors:  Tim Nutbeam; Rob Fenwick; Jason E Smith; Mike Dayson; Brian Carlin; Mark Wilson; Lee Wallis; Willem Stassen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.803

5.  The role of cervical collars and verbal instructions in minimising spinal movement during self-extrication following a motor vehicle collision - a biomechanical study using healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Tim Nutbeam; Rob Fenwick; Barbara May; Willem Stassen; Jason E Smith; Lee Wallis; Mike Dayson; James Shippen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.