Literature DB >> 24005642

Emergency department management of early sepsis: a national survey of emergency medicine and intensive care consultants.

Zoeb Jiwaji1, Shirin Brady2, Lauralyn A McIntyre3, Alasdair Gray4, Timothy S Walsh5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) is recommended for sepsis management in current guidelines, but the underpinning evidence is controversial. Clinician beliefs and the capacity to implement all recommended elements of EGDT in emergency departments (EDs) are uncertain. Our study aimed to explore self-reported management of early sepsis by Scottish emergency medicine (EM) and intensive care medicine (ICM) consultants, delineate important differences and determine the guideline recommendations rated most important and deliverable within the ED.
METHODS: A postal survey using a hypothetical patient with septic shock was sent to all EM and ICM consultants practising in Scotland.
RESULTS: 67% (76/114) EM and 61% (96/157) ICM consultants responded. Normal saline was preferred by EM respondents ('always/often used': EM 86%, ICM 23%, p<0.0001), whereas ICM respondents preferred Hartmann's solution (EM 42%, ICM 72%, p=0.0164), gelofusin (EM 10%, ICM 63%, p<0.0001) and starch (EM 0%, ICM 24%, p<0.0001). More ICM respondents indicated they used central venous pressure and invasive arterial pressure monitoring in the ED, and initiated vasopressors (EM 57%, ICM 90%, p<0.0001). More ICM consultants used specific haemoglobin transfusion triggers (48% EM, 77% ICM, p=0.0002), but marked variation in haemoglobin triggers and targets was reported. Lactate was rated the most important single resuscitation parameter by both specialties; no ED and only two ICM consultants rated ScVO2 most important.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in early fluid and vasopressor management of sepsis exist between Scottish ICM and EM consultants. Transfusion practice is highly variable, suggesting clinical uncertainty. Lactate is considered more important than ScVO2 measurement. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  emergency care systems, emergency departments; infection; intensive care; resuscitation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24005642     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  3 in total

Review 1.  Fluid type and the use of renal replacement therapy in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Rochwerg; W Alhazzani; A Gibson; C M Ribic; A Sindi; D Heels-Ansdell; L Thabane; A Fox-Robichaud; L Mbuagbaw; W Szczeklik; F Alshamsi; S Altayyar; W Ip; G Li; M Wang; A Włudarczyk; Q Zhou; D Annane; D J Cook; R Jaeschke; G H Guyatt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Multicountry survey of emergency and critical care medicine physicians' fluid resuscitation practices for adult patients with early septic shock.

Authors:  Lauralyn McIntyre; Brian H Rowe; Timothy S Walsh; Alasdair Gray; Yaseen Arabi; Anders Perner; Anthony Gordon; John Marshall; Deborah Cook; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Sean M Bagshaw; Robert Green; Irwin Schweitzer; Alexis Turgeon; Ryan Zarychanski; Shane English; Michaël Chassé; Ian Stiell; Dean Fergusson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  The Pathogenesis of Sepsis and Potential Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Min Huang; Shaoli Cai; Jingqian Su
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.