Literature DB >> 24005365

Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction.

Edward I Chang1, Eric I Chang, Miguel A Soto-Miranda, Hong Zhang, Naveed Nosrati, Geoffrey L Robb, David W Chang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of factors that might contribute to abdominal donor-site morbidity after abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction.
METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of all abdominally based free flap breast reconstructions performed from January of 2000 through December of 2010 at their institution.
RESULTS: Overall, 89 of 1507 patients developed an abdominal bulge/hernia (unilateral: 57 of 1044; bilateral: 32 of 463). A unilateral transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap was significantly more likely to develop an abdominal bulge/hernia than was a muscle-sparing TRAM flap or a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap (9.9 percent versus 3.7 percent versus 5.9 percent; p = 0.004). However, there was no difference in the risk of developing an abdominal bulge/hernia between a muscle-sparing TRAM and a DIEP flap (p = 0.36). Patients who underwent bilateral reconstructions were 1.35 times more likely to develop an abdominal bulge/hernia than patients who underwent unilateral reconstruction, but the difference was not significant. Harvesting more fascia as occurs when both medial and lateral rows are used was significantly associated with need for mesh (p < 0.0001). Overall, placement of mesh for fascia closure reduced the odds of occurrence of bulge/hernia by 70 percent compared with primary fascia closure.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the risk of developing abdominal bulge/hernia between bilateral versus unilateral breast reconstruction. For abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction, the extent of the fascia harvested, how it is repaired, and the amount of muscle preserved might play an important role in donor-site morbidity. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24005365     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a805a3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  19 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in microvascular autologous breast reconstruction after ablative tumor surgery.

Authors:  Michael S Pollhammer; Dominik Duscher; Manfred Schmidt; Georg M Huemer
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 2.  Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Paris D Butler; Liza C Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Complications Related to Breast Reconstruction Using Different Skin Flaps After Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Jiahua Xing; Ziqi Jia; Yichi Xu; Muzi Chen; Youbai Chen; Yan Han
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 4.  Combining Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer.

Authors:  Edward I Chang; Jaume Masià; Mark L Smith
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.

Authors:  Jessica Erdmann-Sager; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Gretchen E Guldbrandsen; Yoon S Chun
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Clinical application of a silk fibroin protein biologic scaffold for abdominal wall fascial reinforcement.

Authors:  Mark W Clemens; Susan Downey; Frank Agullo; Max R Lehfeldt; Gabriel M Kind; Humberto Palladino; Deirdre Marshall; Mark L Jewell; Anshu B Mathur; Bradley P Bengtson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-12-05

7.  Donor-Site Morbidity After DIEAP Flap Breast Reconstruction-A 2-Year Postoperative Computed Tomography Comparison.

Authors:  Christoffer Aam Ingvaldsen; Gerhard Bosse; Georg Karl Mynarek; Thomas Berg; Tyge Tind Tindholdt; Kim Alexander Tønseth
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-07-25

8.  Stacked PAP Flaps for Two-Stage Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Case Report.

Authors:  Luis Parra
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2017-05

9.  Myth-Busting the DIEP Flap and an Introduction to the Abdominal Perforator Exchange (APEX) Breast Reconstruction Technique: A Single-Surgeon Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Frank J DellaCroce; Hannah C DellaCroce; Craig A Blum; Scott K Sullivan; Christopher G Trahan; M Whitten Wise; Irena G Brates
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Polypropylene Mesh Complications in the Sublay Position After Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Les complications des treillis de polypropylène en sous-couche après une reconstruction mammaire par voie abdominale.

Authors:  Casey T Kraft; Bianca J Molina; Roman J Skoracki
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 0.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.