INTRODUCTION: The capability of amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) to predict the success of defibrillation (DF) was retrospectively evaluated in a large database of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. METHODS: Electrocardiographic data, including 1260 DFs, were obtained from 609 cardiac arrest patients due to ventricular fibrillation. AMSA sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) for predicting DF success were calculated, together with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Successful DF was defined as the presence of spontaneous rhythm ≥40bpm starting within 60s from the DF. In 303 patients with chest compression (CC) depth data collected with an accelerometer, changes in AMSA were analyzed in relationship to CC depth. RESULTS: AMSA was significantly higher prior to a successful DF than prior to an unsuccessful DF (15.6±0.6 vs. 7.97±0.2mV-Hz, p<0.0001). Intersection of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy curves identified a threshold AMSA of 10mV-Hz to predict DF success with a balanced sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of almost 80%. Higher AMSA thresholds were associated with further increases in accuracy, specificity and PPV. AMSA of 17mV-Hz predicted DF success in two third of instances (PPV of 67%). Low AMSA, instead, predicted unsuccessful DFs with high sensitivity and NPV >97%. Area under the ROC curve was 0.84. CC depth affected AMSA value. When depth was <1.75in., AMSA decreased for consecutive DFs, while it increased when the depth was >1.75in. (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AMSA could be a useful tool to guide CPR interventions and predict the optimal timing of DF.
INTRODUCTION: The capability of amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) to predict the success of defibrillation (DF) was retrospectively evaluated in a large database of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. METHODS: Electrocardiographic data, including 1260 DFs, were obtained from 609 cardiac arrestpatients due to ventricular fibrillation. AMSA sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) for predicting DF success were calculated, together with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Successful DF was defined as the presence of spontaneous rhythm ≥40bpm starting within 60s from the DF. In 303 patients with chest compression (CC) depth data collected with an accelerometer, changes in AMSA were analyzed in relationship to CC depth. RESULTS: AMSA was significantly higher prior to a successful DF than prior to an unsuccessful DF (15.6±0.6 vs. 7.97±0.2mV-Hz, p<0.0001). Intersection of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy curves identified a threshold AMSA of 10mV-Hz to predict DF success with a balanced sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of almost 80%. Higher AMSA thresholds were associated with further increases in accuracy, specificity and PPV. AMSA of 17mV-Hz predicted DF success in two third of instances (PPV of 67%). Low AMSA, instead, predicted unsuccessful DFs with high sensitivity and NPV >97%. Area under the ROC curve was 0.84. CC depth affected AMSA value. When depth was <1.75in., AMSA decreased for consecutive DFs, while it increased when the depth was >1.75in. (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AMSA could be a useful tool to guide CPR interventions and predict the optimal timing of DF.
Authors: David D Salcido; Robert H Schmicker; Noah Kime; Jason E Buick; Sheldon Cheskes; Brian Grunau; Stephanie Zellner; Dana Zive; Tom P Aufderheide; Allison C Koller; Heather Herren; Jack Nuttall; Matthew L Sundermann; James J Menegazzi Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jason Coult; Heemun Kwok; Lawrence Sherman; Jennifer Blackwood; Peter J Kudenchuk; Thomas D Rea Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Henrik Wagner; Michael Götberg; Bjarne Madsen Hardig; Malin Rundgren; Jonas Carlson; Matthias Götberg; David Zughaft; David Erlinge; Göran K Olivecrona Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2014-12-20 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan Journal: Notf Rett Med Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 0.826
Authors: Jos Thannhauser; Joris Nas; Priya Vart; Joep L R M Smeets; Menko-Jan de Boer; Niels van Royen; Judith L Bonnes; Marc A Brouwer Journal: Resusc Plus Date: 2021-04-02
Authors: Sofia Ruiz de Gauna; Unai Irusta; Jesus Ruiz; Unai Ayala; Elisabete Aramendi; Trygve Eftestøl Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Nicolas Segal; Anja K Metzger; Johanna C Moore; Laura India; Michael C Lick; Paul S Berger; Wanchun Tang; David G Benditt; Keith G Lurie Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2017-09