Literature DB >> 24004694

Can structural MRI aid in clinical classification? A machine learning study in two independent samples of patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and healthy subjects.

Hugo G Schnack1, Mireille Nieuwenhuis, Neeltje E M van Haren, Lucija Abramovic, Thomas W Scheewe, Rachel M Brouwer, Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol, René S Kahn.   

Abstract

Although structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revealed partly non-overlapping brain abnormalities in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, it is unknown whether structural MRI scans can be used to separate individuals with schizophrenia from those with bipolar disorder. An algorithm capable of discriminating between these two disorders could become a diagnostic aid for psychiatrists. Here, we scanned 66 schizophrenia patients, 66 patients with bipolar disorder and 66 healthy subjects on a 1.5T MRI scanner. Three support vector machines were trained to separate patients with schizophrenia from healthy subjects, patients with schizophrenia from those with bipolar disorder, and patients with bipolar disorder from healthy subjects, respectively, based on their gray matter density images. The predictive power of the models was tested using cross-validation and in an independent validation set of 46 schizophrenia patients, 47 patients with bipolar disorder and 43 healthy subjects scanned on a 3T MRI scanner. Schizophrenia patients could be separated from healthy subjects with an average accuracy of 90%. Additionally, schizophrenia patients and patients with bipolar disorder could be distinguished with an average accuracy of 88%.The model delineating bipolar patients from healthy subjects was less accurate, correctly classifying 67% of the healthy subjects and only 53% of the patients with bipolar disorder. In the latter group, lithium and antipsychotics use had no influence on the classification results. Application of the 1.5T models on the 3T validation set yielded average classification accuracies of 76% (healthy vs schizophrenia), 66% (bipolar vs schizophrenia) and 61% (healthy vs bipolar). In conclusion, the accurate separation of schizophrenia from bipolar patients on the basis of structural MRI scans, as demonstrated here, could be of added value in the differential diagnosis of these two disorders. The results also suggest that gray matter pathology in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder differs to such an extent that they can be reliably differentiated using machine learning paradigms.
© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipolar disorder; Classification; MRI; Machine learning; Schizophrenia

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24004694     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  76 in total

Review 1.  The Kraepelinian dichotomy viewed by neuroimaging.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine d'Albis; Josselin Houenou
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Individualized differential diagnosis of schizophrenia and mood disorders using neuroanatomical biomarkers.

Authors:  Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Eva M Meisenzahl; Stefan Borgwardt; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Thomas Frodl; Joseph Kambeitz; Yanis Köhler; Peter Falkai; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Maximilian Reiser; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Multisite Machine Learning Analysis Provides a Robust Structural Imaging Signature of Schizophrenia Detectable Across Diverse Patient Populations and Within Individuals.

Authors:  Martin Rozycki; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Guray Erus; Jimit Doshi; Daniel H Wolf; Yong Fan; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Eva M Meisenzahl; Chuanjun Zhuo; Hong Yin; Hao Yan; Weihua Yue; Dai Zhang; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  The contribution of neuroimaging to understanding schizophrenia; past, present, and future.

Authors:  Iris E Sommer; René S Kahn
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Individual prediction of long-term outcome in adolescents at ultra-high risk for psychosis: Applying machine learning techniques to brain imaging data.

Authors:  Sanne de Wit; Tim B Ziermans; M Nieuwenhuis; Patricia F Schothorst; Herman van Engeland; René S Kahn; Sarah Durston; Hugo G Schnack
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  The search for imaging biomarkers in psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Anissa Abi-Dargham; Guillermo Horga
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Age prediction on the basis of brain anatomical measures.

Authors:  S A Valizadeh; J Hänggi; S Mérillat; L Jäncke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Machine learning studies on major brain diseases: 5-year trends of 2014-2018.

Authors:  Koji Sakai; Kei Yamada
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  Towards person-centered neuroimaging markers for resilience and vulnerability in Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Sophia Frangou; Danai Dima; Jigar Jogia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Voxel-based morphometry for separation of schizophrenia from other types of psychosis in first episode psychosis.

Authors:  Lena Palaniyappan; Nicola Maayan; Hanna Bergman; Clare Davenport; Clive E Adams; Karla Soares-Weiser
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.