BACKGROUND: the worldwide population is ageing. One expected consequence of this is an increase in morbidity and an associated increased demand for long-term care. Physical rehabilitation is beneficial in older people, but relatively little is known about effects in residents of long-term care facilities. OBJECTIVE: to examine the effects of physical rehabilitation on activities of daily living (ADL) in elderly residents of long-term care facilities. METHODS: systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. We included studies that compared the effect of a physical rehabilitation intervention on independence in ADL with either no intervention or an alternative intervention in older people (over 60 years) living in long-term care facilities. We searched 19 databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently screened papers and extracted data. Outcomes of included studies were combined in a standardised mean difference random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: thirteen of 14 studies identified were included in the meta-analysis. Independence in ADL was improved by 0.24 standard units (95% CI: 0.11-0.38; P = 0.0005). This is equivalent to 1.3 points on the Barthel Index (0-20 scale). No significant differences in effect were found based on participant or intervention characteristics. Larger sample size and low attrition were associated with smaller estimates of effect. All studies were assessed to be at risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: physical rehabilitation may improve independence for elderly long-term care facility residents, but mean effects are small. It is unclear which interventions are most appropriate.
BACKGROUND: the worldwide population is ageing. One expected consequence of this is an increase in morbidity and an associated increased demand for long-term care. Physical rehabilitation is beneficial in older people, but relatively little is known about effects in residents of long-term care facilities. OBJECTIVE: to examine the effects of physical rehabilitation on activities of daily living (ADL) in elderly residents of long-term care facilities. METHODS: systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. We included studies that compared the effect of a physical rehabilitation intervention on independence in ADL with either no intervention or an alternative intervention in older people (over 60 years) living in long-term care facilities. We searched 19 databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently screened papers and extracted data. Outcomes of included studies were combined in a standardised mean difference random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: thirteen of 14 studies identified were included in the meta-analysis. Independence in ADL was improved by 0.24 standard units (95% CI: 0.11-0.38; P = 0.0005). This is equivalent to 1.3 points on the Barthel Index (0-20 scale). No significant differences in effect were found based on participant or intervention characteristics. Larger sample size and low attrition were associated with smaller estimates of effect. All studies were assessed to be at risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: physical rehabilitation may improve independence for elderly long-term care facility residents, but mean effects are small. It is unclear which interventions are most appropriate.
Authors: M Maltais; Y Rolland; P-E Haÿ; D Armaingaud; P Cestac; L Rouch; P de Souto Barreto Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Laura L Bischoff; Thomas Cordes; Charlotte Meixner; Daniel Schoene; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage; Bettina Wollesen Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-06-14 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Catherine M Sackley; Marion F Walker; Christopher R Burton; Caroline L Watkins; Jonathan Mant; Andrea K Roalfe; Keith Wheatley; Bart Sheehan; Leslie Sharp; Katie E Stant; Joanna Fletcher-Smith; Kerry Steel; Kate Wilde; Lisa Irvine; Guy Peryer Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-02-05
Authors: Louise M Nielsen; Hans Kirkegaard; Lisa G Østergaard; Karina Bovbjerg; Kasper Breinholt; Thomas Maribo Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Susanne Guidetti; Kristina Tomra Nielsen; Cecilie von Bülow; Marc Sampedro Pilegaard; Louise Klokker; Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-05-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Aleksandra Szybalska; Katarzyna Broczek; Przemysław Slusarczyk; Ewa Kozdron; Jerzy Chudek; Monika Puzianowska-Kuznicka; Tomasz Kostka; Anna Skalska; Malgorzata Mossakowska Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 1.710