Literature DB >> 24004426

The challenges of being an insider in storytelling research.

Stacy Blythe1, Lesley Wilkes, Debra Jackson, Elizabeth Halcomb.   

Abstract

AIM: To describe the challenges related to being an 'insider' researcher in a study that uses a feminist-informed storytelling research design and to discuss practical strategies to manage these challenges.
BACKGROUND: The positioning of the researcher in qualitative research has numerous methodological implications. Often, qualitative researchers share similar experiences or characteristics with their participants. Such an 'insider' position provides challenges for the researcher in conducting the research. Understanding these challenges and planning how to manage them is beneficial for the researcher and for the conduct of the project. DATA SOURCES: This paper is based on the research team's experience of undertaking a feminist-informed storytelling study exploring the experiences of Australian women providing long-term foster care. REVIEW
METHODS: This paper provides a discussion of the methodology used in the investigation. DISCUSSION: Four challenges resulting from the insider status of the primary researcher were identified as affecting the research: assumed understanding, ensuring analytic objectivity, dealing with emotions and participants' expectations. Strategies to address these challenges include: 'participant probing', 'researcher reflexivity', review by an 'outsider' researcher, identifying the risk, debriefing, making the aims and use of study outcomes clear, and acknowledging participants' expectations. Methods to implement these strategies are described.
CONCLUSION: The use of an insider researcher was beneficial to our study design and helped with recruitment and rapport, enabling collaboration and the generation of stories rich in content. By identifying the challenges associated with insider research and using strategies to mitigate them, researchers can effectively use an insider position in conjunction with a storytelling research design. ImplicaTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH/PRACTICE: Further investigation of the insider in different qualitative research designs would be useful in identifying challenges and benefits specific to those designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24004426     DOI: 10.7748/nr2013.09.21.1.8.e333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Res        ISSN: 1351-5578


  7 in total

1.  Women's Auto/Biography and Dissociative Identity Disorder: Implications for Mental Health Practice.

Authors:  Kendal Tomlinson; Charley Baker
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2019-09

2.  Hmong Older Adults' Perceptions of Insider and Outsider Researchers: Does It Matter for Research Participation?

Authors:  Maichou Lor; Barbara J Bowers
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Work transitions after serious hand injury: Current occupational therapy practice in a middle-income country.

Authors:  Helen Buchanan; Lana van Niekerk
Journal:  Aust Occup Ther J       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 1.757

4.  Peer interviewing in medical education research: experiences and perceptions of student interviewers and interviewees.

Authors:  Elaine Byrne; Ruairi Brugha; Eric Clarke; Aisling Lavelle; Alice McGarvey
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-09-30

5.  Silent voices of the midwives: factors that influence midwives' achievement of successful neonatal resuscitation in sub-Saharan Africa: a narrative inquiry.

Authors:  Jan Becker; Chase Becker; Florin Oprescu; Chiung-Jung Jo Wu; James Moir; Meshak Shimwela; Marion Gray
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The challenging journey from trauma to post-traumatic growth: Lived experiences of facilitating and hindering factors.

Authors:  Hulda S Bryngeirsdottir; Sigridur Halldorsdottir
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2021-10-28

7.  Storytelling as a research tool and intervention around public health perceptions and behaviour: a protocol for a systematic narrative review.

Authors:  Becky McCall; Laura Shallcross; Michael Wilson; Christopher Fuller; Andrew Hayward
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.006

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.