Literature DB >> 24004382

Life cycle water consumption for shale gas and conventional natural gas.

Corrie E Clark1, Robert M Horner, Christopher B Harto.   

Abstract

Shale gas production represents a large potential source of natural gas for the nation. The scale and rapid growth in shale gas development underscore the need to better understand its environmental implications, including water consumption. This study estimates the water consumed over the life cycle of conventional and shale gas production, accounting for the different stages of production and for flowback water reuse (in the case of shale gas). This study finds that shale gas consumes more water over its life cycle (13-37 L/GJ) than conventional natural gas consumes (9.3-9.6 L/GJ). However, when used as a transportation fuel, shale gas consumes significantly less water than other transportation fuels. When used for electricity generation, the combustion of shale gas adds incrementally to the overall water consumption compared to conventional natural gas. The impact of fuel production, however, is small relative to that of power plant operations. The type of power plant where the natural gas is utilized is far more important than the source of the natural gas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24004382     DOI: 10.1021/es4013855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

Review 1.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Mutagenicity assessment downstream of oil and gas produced water discharges intended for agricultural beneficial reuse.

Authors:  Molly C McLaughlin; Jens Blotevogel; Ruth A Watson; Baylee Schell; Tamzin A Blewett; Erik J Folkerts; Greg G Goss; Lisa Truong; Robyn L Tanguay; Juan Lucas Argueso; Thomas Borch
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Impact of shale gas development on water resources: a case study in northern poland.

Authors:  Ine Vandecasteele; Inés Marí Rivero; Serenella Sala; Claudia Baranzelli; Ricardo Barranco; Okke Batelaan; Carlo Lavalle
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Life cycle water consumption and wastewater generation impacts of a Marcellus shale gas well.

Authors:  Mohan Jiang; Chris T Hendrickson; Jeanne M VanBriesen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Sustainable development index of shale gas exploitation in China, the UK, and the US.

Authors:  Liang Li; Fan Wu; Yuanyu Cao; Fei Cheng; Dali Wang; Huizhen Li; Zhiqiang Yu; Jing You
Journal:  Environ Sci Ecotechnol       Date:  2022-07-31

6.  Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications.

Authors:  Tanya J Gallegos; Brian A Varela; Seth S Haines; Mark A Engle
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 5.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.