BACKGROUND: Cost savings associated with palliative care (PC) consultation have been demonstrated for total hospital costs and daily costs after PC involvement. This analysis adds another approach by examining costs stratified by hospital length of stay (LOS). OBJECTIVE: To examine cost savings for patients who receive PC consultations during short, medium, and long hospitalizations. METHODS: Data were analyzed for 1815 PC patients and 1790 comparison patients from two academic medical centers between 2005 and 2008, matched on discharge disposition, LOS category, and propensity for a PC consultation. We used generalized linear models and regression analysis to compare cost differences for LOS of 1 to 7 days (38% of consults), 8 to 30 days (48%), and >30 days (14%). Comparisons were done for all patients in both hospitals (n=3605) and by discharge disposition: survivors (n=2226) and decedents (n=1379); analyses were repeated for each hospital. RESULTS: Significant savings per admission were associated with shorter LOS: For stays of 1 to 7 days, costs were lower for all PC patients by 13% ($2141), and for survivors by 19.1% ($2946). For stays of 8 to 30 days, costs were lower for all PC patients by 4.9% ($2870), and for survivors by 6% ($2487). Extrapolating the per admission cost across the PC patient groups with lower costs, these programs saved about $1.46 million for LOS under a week and about $2.5 million for LOS of 8 to 30 days. Patients with stays >30 days showed no differences in costs, perhaps due to preferences for more aggressive care for those who stay in the hospital more than a month. CONCLUSION: Cost savings due to PC are realized for short and medium LOS but not stays >30 days. These findings suggest savings can be achieved by earlier involvement of palliative care, and support screening efforts to identify patients who can benefit from PC services early in an admission.
BACKGROUND: Cost savings associated with palliative care (PC) consultation have been demonstrated for total hospital costs and daily costs after PC involvement. This analysis adds another approach by examining costs stratified by hospital length of stay (LOS). OBJECTIVE: To examine cost savings for patients who receive PC consultations during short, medium, and long hospitalizations. METHODS: Data were analyzed for 1815 PC patients and 1790 comparison patients from two academic medical centers between 2005 and 2008, matched on discharge disposition, LOS category, and propensity for a PC consultation. We used generalized linear models and regression analysis to compare cost differences for LOS of 1 to 7 days (38% of consults), 8 to 30 days (48%), and >30 days (14%). Comparisons were done for all patients in both hospitals (n=3605) and by discharge disposition: survivors (n=2226) and decedents (n=1379); analyses were repeated for each hospital. RESULTS: Significant savings per admission were associated with shorter LOS: For stays of 1 to 7 days, costs were lower for all PC patients by 13% ($2141), and for survivors by 19.1% ($2946). For stays of 8 to 30 days, costs were lower for all PC patients by 4.9% ($2870), and for survivors by 6% ($2487). Extrapolating the per admission cost across the PC patient groups with lower costs, these programs saved about $1.46 million for LOS under a week and about $2.5 million for LOS of 8 to 30 days. Patients with stays >30 days showed no differences in costs, perhaps due to preferences for more aggressive care for those who stay in the hospital more than a month. CONCLUSION: Cost savings due to PC are realized for short and medium LOS but not stays >30 days. These findings suggest savings can be achieved by earlier involvement of palliative care, and support screening efforts to identify patients who can benefit from PC services early in an admission.
Authors: Joan D Penrod; Partha Deb; Cornelia Dellenbaugh; James F Burgess; Carolyn W Zhu; Cindy L Christiansen; Carol A Luhrs; Therese Cortez; Elayne Livote; Veleka Allen; R Sean Morrison Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Sally A Norton; Laura A Hogan; Robert G Holloway; Helena Temkin-Greener; Marcia J Buckley; Timothy E Quill Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: R Sean Morrison; Joan D Penrod; J Brian Cassel; Melissa Caust-Ellenbogen; Ann Litke; Lynn Spragens; Diane E Meier Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-09-08
Authors: Peter May; Charles Normand; J Brian Cassel; Egidio Del Fabbro; Robert L Fine; Reagan Menz; Corey A Morrison; Joan D Penrod; Chessie Robinson; R Sean Morrison Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Alexis Chettiar; Maria Montez-Rath; Sai Liu; Yoshio N Hall; Ann M O'Hare; Manjula Kurella Tamura Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Peter May; Melissa M Garrido; J Brian Cassel; Amy S Kelley; Diane E Meier; Charles Normand; Thomas J Smith; Lee Stefanis; R Sean Morrison Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Katherine R Courtright; Vanessa Madden; Nicole B Gabler; Elizabeth Cooney; Dylan S Small; Andrea Troxel; David Casarett; Mary Ersek; J Brian Cassel; Lauren Hersch Nicholas; Gabriel Escobar; Sarah H Hill; Dan O'Brien; Mark Vogel; Scott D Halpern Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-09