Literature DB >> 24003981

The acceptable noise level: the effect of repeated measurements.

K Jonas Brännström1, Lucas Holm, Tobias Kastberg, Steen Østergaard Olsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study explores if increasing number of repetitions might improve the precision of the acceptable noise level (ANL) test.
DESIGN: We measured twelve ANL repetitions, i.e. four complete ANL tests (4 × 3 repetitions), at one session using diotic presentation and a non-semantic ANL version. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirty-two normal-hearing adults.
RESULTS: Small order and fatigue effects were seen. We used the coefficient of repeatability (CR) to assess the repeatability; CRs ranged between 3.9 and 7.6 dB for the four ANL tests. Using the twelve ANL repetitions we removed the variability of the ANL across subjects by normalizing the data to the individual mean ANL for the twelve repetitions. The mean normalized ANL across the subjects rapidly approached the ANL normalized to the individual mean for the 12 repetitions (0 dB), and after three repetitions the SD seemed to be stable at about 3 dB.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that both order and fatigue affect the ANL. The findings also suggest that it may be more accurate to speak of an acceptable noise range than ANL. These findings have large implications for how we understand acceptable noise and it would explain a large part of the variability seen among normal-hearing and perhaps hearing-impaired subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24003981     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.824116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  7 in total

1.  Agreement and reliability of tinnitus loudness matching and pitch likeness rating.

Authors:  Derek J Hoare; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Phillip E Gander; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength Among Hearing Aid Users.

Authors:  Tobias Neher; Kirsten C Wagener
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Efficacy of a Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Function.

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Yuan Chen; Qianran Wang; Volker Kuehnel
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Type of Speech Material Affects Acceptable Noise Level Test Outcome.

Authors:  Xaver Koch; Gertjan Dingemanse; André Goedegebure; Esther Janse
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-26

5.  Selecting Appropriate Tests to Assess the Benefits of Bilateral Amplification With Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Jelmer van Schoonhoven; Michael Schulte; Monique Boymans; Kirsten C Wagener; Wouter A Dreschler; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Comparison of Acceptable Noise Level Generated Using Different Transducers and Response Modes.

Authors:  Liang Xia; Jingchun He; Yuanyuan Sun; Yi Chen; Qiong Luo; Haibo Shi; Yanmei Feng; Shankai Yin
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Representation of amplified speech at cortical level in good and poor hearing aid performers.

Authors:  Hemanth Narayan Shetty; Manjula Puttabasappa
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.