Literature DB >> 2400306

Peritoneal lavage in abdominal sepsis. A controlled clinical study.

M Schein1, G Gecelter, W Freinkel, H Gerding, P J Becker.   

Abstract

The value of intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL) with saline solution, with or without antibiotics, in the treatment of peritoneal contamination, continues to be controversial. A prospective trial was carried out in 87 patients who underwent emergency laparotomies for peritonitis. They were randomized to be treated in one of three ways: group 1 (mean acute physiologic and chronic health evaluation [APACHE] II score, 8) received no IOPL; group 2 (mean APACHE II score, 10) received IOPL with saline solution; and group 3 (mean APACHE II score, 8) received IOPL with saline solution and 2 g of chloramphenicol succinate. In groups 1, 2, and 3, the mortality was 21%, 21%, and 10%, respectively (not significant), and correlated well with the preoperative APACHE II scores. In groups 1, 2, and 3, the mean hospital stay was 13, 13, and 10 days, respectively (not significant), and the incidence of wound infections was 20%, 17%, and 17%, respectively; the incidence of surgical complications was 10%, 24% and 7%, respectively (not significant), and of medical complications, 24%, 31%, and 17%, respectively. We concluded that IOPL with saline solution or antibiotics did not influence the outcome following laparotomies for peritonitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2400306     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410210058008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  19 in total

1.  Treatment strategy when using intraoperative peritoneal lavage for perforated appendicitis in children: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Yasuharu Ohno; Junichiro Furui; Takashi Kanematsu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  Current and future concepts of abdominal sepsis.

Authors:  Klaus Emmanuel; Heike Weighardt; Holger Bartels; Jorg-Rudiger Siewert; Bernhard Holzmann
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  [Relaparotomy in secondary peritonitis Planned relaparotomy or relaparotomy on demand?].

Authors:  B Lamme; C W Mahler; J W O van Till; O van Ruler; D J Gouma; M A Boermeester
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection.

Authors:  Gill Norman; Ross A Atkinson; Tanya A Smith; Ceri Rowlands; Amber D Rithalia; Emma J Crosbie; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-30

Review 5.  Management of secondary peritonitis.

Authors:  D H Wittmann; M Schein; R E Condon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Utilization of acute inpatient services for alcohol detoxification.

Authors:  B M Booth; F C Blow; R L Ludke; R L Ross
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1996

Review 7.  Perforated peptic ulcer - an update.

Authors:  Kin Tong Chung; Vishalkumar G Shelat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-27

8.  [Treatment of peritonitis with staged lavage: prognostic criteria and course of treatment].

Authors:  A Billing; D Fröhlich; O Mialkowskyj; P Stokstad; F W Schildberg
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992

9.  Surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcers: laparoscopic versus open approach.

Authors:  Victor Vakayil; Brent Bauman; Keaton Joppru; Reema Mallick; Christopher Tignanelli; John Connett; Sayeed Ikramuddin; James V Harmon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Planned reoperations and open management in critical intra-abdominal infections: prospective experience in 52 cases.

Authors:  M Schein
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.