Literature DB >> 24001589

Effect of the number of pins and inter-pin distance on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following mechanical tactile stimulation.

Hideaki Onishi1, Kazuhiro Sugawara, Koya Yamashiro, Daisuke Sato, Makoto Suzuki, Hikari Kirimoto, Hiroyuki Tamaki, Hiroatsu Murakami, Shigeki Kameyama.   

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings were collected to investigate the effect of the number of mechanical pins and inter-pin distance on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) following mechanical stimulation (MS). We used a 306-ch whole-head MEG system. SEFs were elicited through tactile stimuli with 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 8-pins using healthy participants. Tactile stimuli were applied to the tip of the right index finger. SEF following electrical stimulation of the index finger was recorded in order to compare the activity in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) following MS. Prominent SEFs were recorded from the contralateral hemisphere approximately 54 ms (P50m) and 125 ms (P100m) after MS regardless of the number of pins. Equivalent current dipoles were located in the S1. The source activities for P50m and P100m significantly increased in tandem with the number of pins for MS. However, the increased ratios for the source activities according to the increase in the number of pins were significantly smaller than that induced by electrical stimulation, and when the number of the pins doubled from 1-pin to 2-pins, from 2-pins to 4-pins, and from 4-pins to 8-pins, S1 activities increased by only 130%. Additionally, source activities significantly increased when the inter-pin distance increased from 2.4 to 7.2 mm. The number of stimulated receptors was considered to have increased with an increase in the inter-pin distance as well as an increase in the number of pins. These findings clarified the effect of the number of pins and inter-pin distance for MS on SEFs.
© 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECD; ES; MEG; MRI; MS; Magnetoencephalography; Mechanical stimulation; S1; SEF; SSS; ST; Tactile stimulation; electrical stimulation; equivalent current dipole; magnetic resonance image; magnetoencephalography; mechanical stimulation; primary somatosensory cortex; sensory perception threshold; signal space separation; somatosensory evoked magnetic field

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24001589     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  7 in total

1.  Vibrotactile piezoelectric stimulation system with precise and versatile timing control for somatosensory research.

Authors:  Limin Sun; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  No relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Hideaki Onishi; Kazuhiro Sugawara; Shota Miyaguchi; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hiroshi Shirozu; Shigeki Kameyama
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability Depends on the Pattern of Mechanical Tactile Stimulation.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Hideaki Onishi; Shota Miyaguchi; Shinichi Kotan; Ryoki Sasaki; Masaki Nakagawa; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  The effect of stimulation type, head modeling, and combined EEG and MEG on the source reconstruction of the somatosensory P20/N20 component.

Authors:  Marios Antonakakis; Sophie Schrader; Andreas Wollbrink; Robert Oostenveld; Stefan Rampp; Jens Haueisen; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Shota Miyaguchi; Ryoki Sasaki; Shota Tsuiki; Kei Saito; Yasuto Inukai; Naofumi Otsuru; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Do Differences in Levels, Types, and Duration of Muscle Contraction Have an Effect on the Degree of Post-exercise Depression?

Authors:  Shota Miyaguchi; Sho Kojima; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The Repetitive Mechanical Tactile Stimulus Intervention Effects Depend on Input Methods.

Authors:  Hiraku Watanabe; Sho Kojima; Naofumi Otsuru; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.