Literature DB >> 24001480

Oculomotor involvement in spatial working memory is task-specific.

Keira Ball1, David G Pearson, Daniel T Smith.   

Abstract

Many everyday tasks, such as remembering where you parked, require the capacity to store and manipulate information about the visual and spatial properties of the world. The ability to represent, remember, and manipulate spatial information is known as visuospatial working memory (VSWM). Despite substantial interest in VSWM the mechanisms responsible for this ability remain debated. One influential idea is that VSWM depends on activity in the eye-movement (oculomotor) system. However, this has proved difficult to test because experimental paradigms that disrupt oculomotor control also interfere with other cognitive systems, such as spatial attention. Here, we present data from a novel paradigm that selectively disrupts activation in the oculomotor system. We show that the inability to make eye-movements is associated with impaired performance on the Corsi Blocks task, but not on Arrow Span, Visual Patterns, Size Estimation or Digit Span tasks. It is argued that the oculomotor system is required to encode and maintain spatial locations indicted by a change in physical salience, but not non-salient spatial locations indicated by the meaning of a symbolic cue. This suggestion offers a way to reconcile the currently conflicting evidence regarding the role of the oculomotor system in spatial working memory.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Attention; Eye movement; Saccade; Spatial; Visual; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24001480     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  9 in total

1.  A functional role for oculomotor preparation in mental arithmetic evidenced by the abducted eye paradigm.

Authors:  Nicolas Masson; Mauro Pesenti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-06-27

2.  Working Memory Phenotypes in Early Multiple Sclerosis: Appraisal of Phenotype Frequency, Progression and Test Sensitivity.

Authors:  Meaghan Clough; Jade Bartholomew; Owen B White; Joanne Fielding
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Neural Evidence for Different Types of Position Coding Strategies in Spatial Working Memory.

Authors:  Nina Purg; Martina Starc; Anka Slana Ozimič; Aleksij Kraljič; Andraž Matkovič; Grega Repovš
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  The Role of the Oculomotor System in Updating Visual-Spatial Working Memory across Saccades.

Authors:  Paul J Boon; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Oculomotor rehabilitation in children with dyslexia.

Authors:  Fatemeh Jafarlou; Farnoush Jarollahi; Mohsen Ahadi; Vahid Sadeghi-Firoozabadi; Hamid Haghani
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-12-24

6.  On-item fixations during serial encoding do not affect spatial working memory.

Authors:  Stefan Czoschke; Sebastian Henschke; Elke B Lange
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Associations and Dissociations between Oculomotor Readiness and Covert Attention.

Authors:  Soazig Casteau; Daniel T Smith
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-07

8.  On the link between attentional search and the oculomotor system: Is preattentive search restricted to the range of eye movements?

Authors:  Soazig Casteau; Daniel T Smith
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  The effect of offset cues on saccade programming and covert attention.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Soazig Casteau
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.143

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.