Literature DB >> 24001034

Computational analysis of the binding specificity of Gleevec to Abl, c-Kit, Lck, and c-Src tyrosine kinases.

Yen-Lin Lin1, Benoît Roux.   

Abstract

Gleevec, a well-known cancer therapeutic agent, is an effective inhibitor of several tyrosine kinases, including Abl and c-Kit, but displays less potency to inhibit closely homologous tyrosine kinases, such as Lck and c-Src. Because many structural features of the binding site are highly conserved in these homologous kinases, the molecular determinants responsible for the binding specificity of Gleevec remain poorly understood. To address this issue, free energy perturbation molecular dynamics (FEP/MD) simulations with explicit solvent was used to compute the binding affinity of Gleevec to Abl, c-Kit, Lck, and c-Src. The results of the FEP/MD calculations are in good agreement with experiments, enabling a detailed and quantitative dissection of the absolute binding free energy in terms of various thermodynamic contributions affecting the binding specificity of Gleevec to the kinases. Dominant binding free energy contributions arises from the van der Waals dispersive interaction, compensating about two-thirds of the unfavorable free energy penalty associated with the loss of translational, rotational, and conformational freedom of the ligand upon binding. In contrast, the contributions from electrostatic and repulsive interactions nearly cancel out due to solvent effects. Furthermore, the calculations show the importance of the conformation of the kinase activation loop. Among the kinases examined, Abl provides the most favorable binding environment for Gleevec via optimal protein-ligand interactions and a small free energy cost for loss of the translational, rotational, and conformational freedom upon ligand binding. The FEP/MD calculations additionally reveal that Lck and c-Src provide similar nonbinding interactions with the bound-Gleevec, but the former pays less entropic penalty for the ligand losing its translational, rotational, and conformational motions to bind, examining the empirically observed differential binding affinities of Gleevec between the two Src-family kinases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24001034      PMCID: PMC4026022          DOI: 10.1021/ja405939x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  73 in total

1.  Principles of protein-protein recognition.

Authors:  C Chothia; J Janin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Thermodynamic stability of water molecules in the bacteriorhodopsin proton channel: a molecular dynamics free energy perturbation study.

Authors:  B Roux; M Nina; R Pomès; J C Smith
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  The crystal structure of a c-Src complex in an active conformation suggests possible steps in c-Src activation.

Authors:  Sandra W Cowan-Jacob; Gabriele Fendrich; Paul W Manley; Wolfgang Jahnke; Doriano Fabbro; Janis Liebetanz; Thomas Meyer
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Inhibition of c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase activity by STI 571, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Authors:  M C Heinrich; D J Griffith; B J Druker; C L Wait; K A Ott; A J Zigler
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  C D Blanke; B L Eisenberg; M C Heinrich
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2001-12

Review 7.  Evolution of protein kinase signaling from yeast to man.

Authors:  Gerard Manning; Gregory D Plowman; Tony Hunter; Sucha Sudarsanam
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 8.  Imatinib therapy in chronic myelogenous leukemia: strategies to avoid and overcome resistance.

Authors:  A Hochhaus; P La Rosée
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Analysis of imatinib and sorafenib binding to p38alpha compared with c-Abl and b-Raf provides structural insights for understanding the selectivity of inhibitors targeting the DFG-out form of protein kinases.

Authors:  Haridasan V Namboodiri; Marina Bukhtiyarova; Joseph Ramcharan; Michael Karpusas; Younghee Lee; Eric B Springman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Inhibition of drug-resistant mutants of ABL, KIT, and EGF receptor kinases.

Authors:  Todd A Carter; Lisa M Wodicka; Neil P Shah; Anne Marie Velasco; Miles A Fabian; Daniel K Treiber; Zdravko V Milanov; Corey E Atteridge; William H Biggs; Philip T Edeen; Mark Floyd; Julia M Ford; Robert M Grotzfeld; Sanna Herrgard; Darren E Insko; Shamal A Mehta; Hitesh K Patel; William Pao; Charles L Sawyers; Harold Varmus; Patrick P Zarrinkar; David J Lockhart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  22 in total

1.  Molecular modeling study of the induced-fit effect on kinase inhibition: the case of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3).

Authors:  Yan Li; Michel Delamar; Patricia Busca; Guillaume Prestat; Laurent Le Corre; Laurence Legeai-Mallet; RongJing Hu; Ruisheng Zhang; Florent Barbault
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  On Restraints in End-Point Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  William M Menzer; Bing Xie; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Molecular Determinants of Substrate Affinity and Enzyme Activity of a Cytochrome P450BM3 Variant.

Authors:  Inacrist Geronimo; Catherine A Denning; David K Heidary; Edith C Glazer; Christina M Payne
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Rapid Identification of Inhibitors and Prediction of Ligand Selectivity for Multiple Proteins: Application to Protein Kinases.

Authors:  Zhiwei Ma; Sheng-You Huang; Fei Cheng; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Computer Simulations of the Dissociation Mechanism of Gleevec from Abl Kinase with Milestoning.

Authors:  Brajesh Narayan; Nicolae-Viorel Buchete; Ron Elber
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Conformational analysis of the DFG-out kinase motif and biochemical profiling of structurally validated type II inhibitors.

Authors:  R S K Vijayan; Peng He; Vivek Modi; Krisna C Duong-Ly; Haiching Ma; Jeffrey R Peterson; Roland L Dunbrack; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Uncovering Molecular Bases Underlying Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor Inhibitor Selectivity.

Authors:  Abdelaziz Alsamarah; Alecander E LaCuran; Peter Oelschlaeger; Jijun Hao; Yun Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Molecular Determinants Underlying Binding Specificities of the ABL Kinase Inhibitors: Combining Alanine Scanning of Binding Hot Spots with Network Analysis of Residue Interactions and Coevolution.

Authors:  Amanda Tse; Gennady M Verkhivker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  LCK over-expression drives STAT5 oncogenic signaling in PAX5 translocated BCP-ALL patients.

Authors:  Valeria Cazzaniga; Cristina Bugarin; Michela Bardini; Marco Giordan; Geertruy te Kronnie; Giuseppe Basso; Andrea Biondi; Grazia Fazio; Giovanni Cazzaniga
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-01-30

10.  Evolution and intelligent design in drug development.

Authors:  Roman V Agafonov; Christopher Wilson; Dorothee Kern
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2015-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.