Literature DB >> 23999861

Brief communication: Morphological effects of captivity: A geometric morphometric analysis of the dorsal side of the scapula in captive-bred and wild-caught Hominoidea.

Gaëlle Bello-Hellegouarch1, Josep Maria Potau, Julia Arias-Martorell, Juan Francisco Pastor, Alejandro Pérez-Pérez.   

Abstract

Many osteological collections from museums and research institutions consist mainly of remains from captive-bred animals. The restrictions related to the space of their enclosures and the nature of its substrate are likely to affect the locomotor and postural behaviors of captive-bred animals, which are widely considered uninformative regarding bone morphology and anatomical adaptations of wild animals, especially so in the case of extant great apes. We made a landmark-based geometric morphometrics analysis of the dorsal side of the scapular bone of both wild-caught and captive-bred great apes to clarify the effect of captivity on the morphology of a bone greatly involved in locomotion. The comparison suggested that captivity did not have a significant effect on the landmark configuration used, neither on average scapular shape nor shape variability, being impossible to distinguish the scapulae of a captive-bred animal from that of a wild-caught one. This indicates that the analyzed scapulae from captive Hominoidea specimens may be used in morphological or taxonomic analyses since they show no atypical morphological traits caused by living conditions in captivity.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D geometric morphometrics; Hominoidea; captivity; scapula

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23999861     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  6 in total

1.  Postcranial Skeletal Differences in Free-Range and Captive-Born Primates.

Authors:  Luci Ann P Kohn; Gabriele R Lubach
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  The effects of captive versus wild rearing environments on long bone articular surfaces in common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Kristi L Lewton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Phenotypic plasticity in the mandibular morphology of Japanese macaques: captive-wild comparison.

Authors:  Siti Norsyuhada Kamaluddin; Mikiko Tanaka; Hikaru Wakamori; Takeshi Nishimura; Tsuyoshi Ito
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Cranial morphology of captive mammals: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leila Siciliano-Martina; Jessica E Light; A Michelle Lawing
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Effects of reduced mobility on trabecular bone density in captive big cats.

Authors:  Habiba Chirchir; Christopher Ruff; Kristofer M Helgen; Richard Potts
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Effects of Captivity on the Morphology of the Insertion Sites of the Palmar Radiocarpal Ligaments in Hominoid Primates.

Authors:  Aroa Casado; Yasmina Avià; Miquel Llorente; David Riba; Juan Francisco Pastor; Josep Maria Potau
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.