Literature DB >> 23999580

Longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis with and without aquaporin 4 antibodies.

Joanna Kitley1, Maria Isabel Leite, Wilhelm Küker, Gerardine Quaghebeur, Jithin George, Patrick Waters, Mark Woodhall, Angela Vincent, Jacqueline Palace.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Aquaporin 4 antibody (AQP4-Ab)-negative patients with longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) behave differently from those with AQP4-Ab. Aquaporin 4 antibody-negative neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is rare when good assays are used.
OBJECTIVE: To assess if AQP4-Ab-negative patients with LETM share similar disease characteristics with AQP4-Ab-positive patients or whether they have distinct features and alternative diagnoses. DESIGN We collated clinical and paraclinical data on patients with LETM identified through the Oxford NMO clinical database. Aquaporin 4 antibodies were tested using 2 sensitive assays. We describe the features of patients with LETM, compare findings between patients with and without AQP4-Ab, and describe alternative diagnoses in AQP4-Ab-negative patients.
SETTING: Single specialist UK center for NMO. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-six adult patients with LETM. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Comparison of clinical and paraclinical data.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of patients were AQP4-Ab positive. Alternative diagnoses could usually be identified in AQP4-Ab-negative patients, including those fulfilling NMO diagnostic criteria. Only 6.5% of patients had "true" seronegative NMO and 6.5% had idiopathic LETM. There were some important differences between AQP4-Ab-positive and -negative cases, including older onset age, higher proportion of females, lower incidence of simultaneous optic neuritis, lower frequency of conus involvement, and higher prevalence of coexisting autoimmune disorders in AQP4-Ab-positive cases. Attack severity and degree of recovery were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients with LETM without AQP4-Ab include a number of different diagnostic categories and it is not surprising therefore that they show important differences compared with AQP4-Ab-positive patients, even when considering only those fulfilling current NMO diagnostic criteria. Thus, we suggest that diagnoses such as myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease, multiple sclerosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and postinfectious disorders should be exclusions in the NMO diagnostic criteria and AQP4-Ab-positive and antibody-negative NMO/NMO spectrum disorder cohorts should be analyzed separately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23999580     DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Neurol        ISSN: 2168-6149            Impact factor:   18.302


  32 in total

1.  Neuroimmunology: Aquaporin-4-antibody-seronegative neuromyelitis optica is less common than previously thought.

Authors:  Hemi Malkki
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Differential Diagnosis of Acute Myelopathies: An Update.

Authors:  M Nichtweiß; S Weidauer
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Clinical and radiological characteristics of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in the North Egyptian Nile Delta.

Authors:  Sara Salama; Hazem Marouf; M Ihab Reda; Amal R Mansour; Osama ELKholy; Michael Levy
Journal:  J Neuroimmunol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 4.  Treatment of neuromyelitis optica: state-of-the-art and emerging therapies.

Authors:  Marios C Papadopoulos; Jeffrey L Bennett; Alan S Verkman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Acute human T-lymphotropic virus type I-associated myelitis: a rare case successfully treated with intravenous pulse methylprednisolone.

Authors:  Reza Boostani; Ali Ghabeli Juibary
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.643

6.  Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and adenocarcinoma of ovary: a novel association.

Authors:  Julie Sachdeva; Ramandeep Bansal; Aastha Takkar; Rajveer Singh
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-04-24

Review 7.  The current role of MRI in differentiating multiple sclerosis from its imaging mimics.

Authors:  Ruth Geraldes; Olga Ciccarelli; Frederik Barkhof; Nicola De Stefano; Christian Enzinger; Massimo Filippi; Monika Hofer; Friedemann Paul; Paolo Preziosa; Alex Rovira; Gabriele C DeLuca; Ludwig Kappos; Tarek Yousry; Franz Fazekas; Jette Frederiksen; Claudio Gasperini; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Nikos Evangelou; Jacqueline Palace
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  MRI differences between MOG antibody disease and AQP4 NMOSD.

Authors:  Sara Salama; Majid Khan; Amirali Shanechi; Michael Levy; Izlem Izbudak
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 9.  Experimental models of neuromyelitis optica: current status, challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Minshu Li; Yaping Yan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging in immune-mediated myelopathies.

Authors:  M J Wendebourg; S Nagy; T Derfuss; K Parmar; R Schlaeger
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.