Literature DB >> 23998839

Carbon footprint of patient journeys through primary care: a mixed methods approach.

Elizabeth Andrews1, David Pearson, Charlotte Kelly, Laura Stroud, Martin Rivas Perez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The NHS has a target of cutting its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. Travel comprises 17% of the NHS carbon footprint. This carbon footprint represents the total CO2 emissions caused directly or indirectly by the NHS. Patient journeys have previously been planned largely without regard to the environmental impact. The potential contribution of 'avoidable' journeys in primary care is significant. AIM: To investigate the carbon footprint of patients travelling to and from a general practice surgery, the issues involved, and potential solutions for reducing patient travel. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A mixed methods study in a medium-sized practice in Yorkshire.
METHOD: During March 2012, 306 patients completed a travel survey. GIS maps of patients' travel (modes and distances) were produced. Two focus groups (12 clinical and 13 non-clinical staff) were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using a thematic framework approach.
RESULTS: The majority (61%) of patient journeys to and from the surgery were made by car or taxi; main reasons cited were 'convenience', 'time saving', and 'no alternative' for accessing the surgery. Using distances calculated via ArcGIS, the annual estimated CO2 equivalent carbon emissions for the practice totalled approximately 63 tonnes. Predominant themes from interviews related to issues with systems for booking appointments and repeat prescriptions; alternative travel modes; delivering health care; and solutions to reducing travel.
CONCLUSION: The modes and distances of patient travel can be accurately determined and allow appropriate carbon emission calculations for GP practices. Although challenging, there is scope for identifying potential solutions (for example, modifying administration systems and promoting walking) to reduce 'avoidable' journeys and cut carbon emissions while maintaining access to health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23998839      PMCID: PMC3750798          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X671579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  3 in total

1.  Health, energy vulnerability and climate change: a retrospective thematic analysis of primary care trust policies and practices.

Authors:  J Richardson; F Kagawa; A Nichols
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.427

2.  Climate change, health and sustainability: a brief survey of primary care trusts in the south west of England.

Authors:  Andrew Nichols; Janet Richardson
Journal:  Perspect Public Health       Date:  2011-03

3.  Car travel time and accessibility by bus to general practitioner services: a study using patient registers and GIS.

Authors:  Andrew Lovett; Robin Haynes; Gisela Sünnenberg; Susan Gale
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.634

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  What sustainability means for primary care: primary care leads to better overall resource use and higher quality outcomes.

Authors:  Tim Ballard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Carbon footprint of patient journeys.

Authors:  Mike Clayton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  What is the carbon footprint of primary care practices? A retrospective life-cycle analysis in Switzerland.

Authors:  John Nicolet; Yolanda Mueller; Paola Paruta; Julien Boucher; Nicolas Senn
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  Virtual consultation in paediatric urology during the COVID-19 pandemic: The effect of pathology on the outcome.

Authors:  Hesham ElAgami; Benjamin Woodward; Gbenga Awolaran; Varadarajan Kalidasan
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 6.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.