Literature DB >> 23998740

Nonsurgical fertility control for managing free-roaming dog populations: a review of products and criteria for field applications.

Giovanna Massei1, Lowell A Miller.   

Abstract

About 75% of dogs worldwide are free to roam and reproduce, thus creating locally overabundant populations. Problems caused by roaming dogs include diseases transmitted to livestock and humans, predation on livestock, attacks on humans, road traffic accidents, and nuisance behavior. Nonsurgical fertility control is increasingly advocated as more cost-effective than surgical sterilization to manage dog populations and their impact. The aims of this review were to 1) analyze trends in numbers of scientific publications on nonsurgical fertility control for dogs; 2) illustrate the spectrum of fertility inhibitors available for dogs; 3) examine how differences between confined and free-roaming dogs might affect the choice of fertility inhibitors to be used in dog population management; and 4) provide a framework of criteria to guide decisions regarding the use of nonsurgical fertility control for dog population management. The results showed that the 117 articles published between 1982 and 2011 focussed on long-term hormonal contraceptives, such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, immunocontraceptives, and male chemical sterilants. The number of articles published biennially increased from one to five papers produced in the early 1980s to 10 to 20 in the past decade. Differences between confined dogs and free-roaming dogs include reproduction and survival as well as social expectations regarding the duration of infertility, the costs of sterilization, and the responsibilities for meeting these costs. These differences are likely to dictate which fertility inhibitors will be used for confined or free-roaming dogs. The criteria regarding the use of fertility control for dog population management, presented as a decision tree, covered social acceptance, animal welfare, effectiveness, legal compliance, feasibility, and sustainability. The review concluded that the main challenges for the future are evaluating the feasibility, effectiveness, sustainability, and effects of mass nonsurgical sterilization campaigns on dog population size and impact as well as integrating nonsurgical fertility control with disease vaccination and public education programs.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Dog population management; Fertility inhibitors; GnRH agonists; Immunocontraception; Sterilants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23998740     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  12 in total

Review 1.  BOARD INVITED REVIEW: Immunocontraception as a possible tool to reduce feral pig populations: recent and future perspectives.

Authors:  Claudio Oliviero; Lena Lindh; Olli Peltoniemi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Recombinant rabies virus expressing dog GM-CSF is an efficacious oral rabies vaccine for dogs.

Authors:  Ming Zhou; Lei Wang; Songqin Zhou; Zhao Wang; Juncheng Ruan; Lijun Tang; Ziming Jia; Min Cui; Ling Zhao; Zhen F Fu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-17

3.  Nanocarrier-mediated delivery of α-mangostin for non-surgical castration of male animals.

Authors:  Jakarwan Yostawonkul; Suvimol Surassmo; Katawut Namdee; Mattaka Khongkow; Chatwalee Boonthum; Sasithon Pagseesing; Nattika Saengkrit; Uracha Rungsardthong Ruktanonchai; Kaywalee Chatdarong; Suppawiwat Ponglowhapan; Teerapong Yata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The Role of Dog Population Management in Rabies Elimination-A Review of Current Approaches and Future Opportunities.

Authors:  Louise H Taylor; Ryan M Wallace; Deepashree Balaram; Joann M Lindenmayer; Douglas C Eckery; Beryl Mutonono-Watkiss; Ellie Parravani; Louis H Nel
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-07-10

Review 5.  Desexing Dogs: A Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Silvan R Urfer; Matt Kaeberlein
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Population Estimation Methods for Free-Ranging Dogs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vinícius Silva Belo; Guilherme Loureiro Werneck; Eduardo Sérgio da Silva; David Soeiro Barbosa; Claudio José Struchiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Gender, Sterilization, and Environment on the Spatial Distribution of Free-Roaming Dogs: An Intervention Study in an Urban Setting.

Authors:  Saulo Nascimento de Melo; Eduardo Sergio da Silva; David Soeiro Barbosa; Rafael Gonçalves Teixeira-Neto; Gustavo Augusto Lacorte; Marco Aurélio Pereira Horta; Diogo Tavares Cardoso; Guilherme Loureiro Werneck; Claudio José Struchiner; Vinícius Silva Belo
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05-27

8.  Demographic characteristics of free-roaming dogs (FRD) in rural and urban India following a photographic sight-resight survey.

Authors:  Harish Kumar Tiwari; Ian D Robertson; Mark O'Dea; Abi Tamim Vanak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Prevalence of Intestinal Helminths in Free-Ranging Canids of Mazandaran, Northern Iran.

Authors:  Abolghasem Siyadatpanah; Shirzad Gholami; Ahmad Daryani; Shahabeddin Sarvi; Mehdi Sharif; Mauricio Seguel; Larson Boundenga; Afsaneh Amouei; Abdol Sattar Pagheh; Mohammad Taghi Rahimi; Seyed Abdollah Hosseini; Davood Anvari
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.012

10.  A novel approach to nonsurgical sterilization; application of menadione-modified gonocyte-targeting M13 bacteriophage for germ cell ablation in utero.

Authors:  Barbara A Fraser; Kasey Miller; Natalie A Trigg; Nathan D Smith; Patrick S Western; Brett Nixon; Robert J Aitken
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2020-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.