Literature DB >> 23998458

Evaluating developmental shape changes in Homo antecessor subadult facial morphology.

Sarah E Freidline1, Philipp Gunz, Katerina Harvati, Jean-Jacques Hublin.   

Abstract

The fossil ATD6-69 from Atapuerca, Spain, dated to ca. 900 ka (thousands of years ago) has been suggested to mark the earliest appearance of modern human facial features. However, this specimen is a subadult and the interpretation of its morphology remains controversial, because it is unclear how developmental shape changes would affect the features that link ATD6-69 to modern humans. Here we analyze ATD6-69 in an evolutionary and developmental context. Our modern human sample comprises cross-sectional growth series from four populations. The fossil sample covers human specimens from the Pleistocene to the Upper Paleolithic, and includes several subadult Early Pleistocene humans and Neanderthals. We digitized landmarks and semilandmarks on surface and CT scans and analyzed the Procrustes shape coordinates using multivariate statistics. Ontogenetic allometric trajectories and developmental simulations were employed in order to identify growth patterns and to visualize potential adult shapes of ATD6-69. We show that facial differences between modern and archaic humans are not exclusively allometric. We find that while postnatal growth further accentuates the differences in facial features between Neanderthals and modern humans, those features that have been suggested to link ATD6-69's morphology to modern humans would not have been significantly altered in the course of subsequent development. In particular, the infraorbital depression on this specimen would have persisted into adulthood. However, many of the facial features that ATD6-69 shares with modern humans can be considered to be part of a generalized pattern of facial architecture. Our results present a complex picture regarding the polarity of facial features and demonstrate that some modern human-like facial morphology is intermittently present in Middle Pleistocene humans. We suggest that some of the facial features that characterize recent modern humans may have developed multiple times in human evolution.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometry; Middle Pleistocene; Neanderthal; Ontogeny; Semilandmark geometric morphometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23998458     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  5 in total

Review 1.  The origin and evolution of Homo sapiens.

Authors:  Chris Stringer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Shape analysis of spatial relationships between orbito-ocular and endocranial structures in modern humans and fossil hominids.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Pereira-Pedro; Michael Masters; Emiliano Bruner
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  The evolutionary history of the human face.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Lacruz; Chris B Stringer; William H Kimbel; Bernard Wood; Katerina Harvati; Paul O'Higgins; Timothy G Bromage; Juan-Luis Arsuaga
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Evolutionary development of the Homo antecessor scapulae (Gran Dolina site, Atapuerca) suggests a modern-like development for Lower Pleistocene Homo.

Authors:  Daniel García-Martínez; David J Green; José María Bermúdez de Castro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The dental proteome of Homo antecessor.

Authors:  Frido Welker; Jazmín Ramos-Madrigal; Petra Gutenbrunner; Meaghan Mackie; Shivani Tiwary; Rosa Rakownikow Jersie-Christensen; Cristina Chiva; Marc R Dickinson; Martin Kuhlwilm; Marc de Manuel; Pere Gelabert; María Martinón-Torres; Ann Margvelashvili; Juan Luis Arsuaga; Eudald Carbonell; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Kirsty Penkman; Eduard Sabidó; Jürgen Cox; Jesper V Olsen; David Lordkipanidze; Fernando Racimo; Carles Lalueza-Fox; José María Bermúdez de Castro; Eske Willerslev; Enrico Cappellini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.