Literature DB >> 23998141

Clinical evaluation of 1,132 zirconia-based single crowns: a retrospective cohort study from the AIOP clinical research group.

Carlo Monaco, Mauro Caldari, Roberto Scotti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to gather the outcomes of zirconia single crowns made by 16 members of the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP) over a time period of up to 5 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 398 patients treated in private practices with 1,132 zirconia-based single-crown restorations made on natural teeth from January 2005 to July 2010 were included. Three hundred forty-three anterior restorations (30.3%) and 789 posterior crowns (69.7%) were made with 16 types of zirconia, using primarily chamfer or knife-edge tooth preparation, and examined according to the esthetic, functional, and biologic criteria. To evaluate the relationship of parafunction with mechanical failure, patients with clenching or bruxism were not excluded from the study group.
RESULTS: The cumulative survival rate of all restorations was 98.1%, while the cumulative success rate was 94.3%. Functional criteria had the highest number of failures. The odds ratio (OR) for all restorations was calculated to clarify the relationship between patients who were subject/not subject to parafunctions and technical complications; the OR was 2.60. An association between parafunction and mechanical failure was found in patients with severe parafunction.
CONCLUSIONS: Porcelain-veneered zirconia single crowns with chamfer and knife-edge preparations showed good clinical results over a period of up to 5 years. Technical complications were few and were limited primarily to patients with parafunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23998141     DOI: 10.11607/ijp.3099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  10 in total

1.  Long-term performance of posterior InCeram Alumina crowns cemented with different luting agents: a prospective, randomized clinical split-mouth study over 5 years.

Authors:  Christian F Selz; Joerg R Strub; Kirstin Vach; Petra C Guess
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Risk factors for technical and biological complications with zirconia single crowns.

Authors:  Sven Rinke; Katharina Lange; Matthias Roediger; Nikolaus Gersdorff
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Clinical evaluation of zirconia-based all-ceramic single crowns: an up to 12-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shoko Miura; Shin Kasahara; Shinobu Yamauchi; Yayoi Okuyama; Akio Izumida; Jun Aida; Hiroshi Egusa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of implant versus tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns in a split-mouth design: a 4-year clinical follow-up study.

Authors:  Mustafa Barış Güncü; Umut Cakan; Guliz Aktas; Güliz Nigar Güncü; Şenay Canay
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Remake Rates for Single-Unit Crowns in Clinical Practice: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Mark S Litaker; Valeria V Gordan; Thomas Karr; Ellen Sowell; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Influence of Different Framework Designs on the Fracture Properties of Ceria-Stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia/Alumina-Based All-Ceramic Crowns.

Authors:  Tomofumi Sawada; Sebastian Spintzyk; Christine Schille; Ernst Schweizer; Lutz Scheideler; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  A pilot trial on lithium disilicate partial crowns using a novel prosthodontic functional index for teeth (FIT).

Authors:  Edoardo Ferrari Cagidiaco; Simone Grandini; Cecilia Goracci; Tim Joda
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Unexpected Complication Ten Years after Initial Treatment: Long-Term Report and Fate of a Maxillary Premolar Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Davide Augusti; Gabriele Augusti
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2018-09-16

9.  Influence of preparation design on fracture resistance of different monolithic zirconia crowns: A comparative study.

Authors:  Meelad Basil Findakly; Haider Hasan Jasim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Third-Generation Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Fabricated with Complete Digital Workflow: Two-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Mustafa Gseibat; Pablo Sevilla; Carlos Lopez-Suarez; Verónica Rodríguez; Jesús Peláez; María J Suárez
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.