Literature DB >> 23997520

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer - single center experience.

Rajshekhar C Jaka1, S P Somashekhar, Shabber S Zaveri, Zahoor Ahmed, K R Ashwin.   

Abstract

Majority of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy complications were related to the chemoport. Aim of our study was to find the means of reducing complications of IP chemoport, to increase the benefits of IP chemotherapy. During January 2007 to December 2010, hundred consecutive patients of stage III epithelial ovarian cancer who had optimal cytoreduction underwent chemoport insertion during laparotomy. Initial 20 cases had 14.3F Bard IP chemoport, and later cases had 9.6Fr single lumen venous port inserted intraperitoneally. Entry point into the peritoneum was single, 6 cm lateral to the umbilicus and double purse-string suture taken around the catheter to prevent peri-catheter backflow of ascitic fluid or drug. Modified IP chemotherapy regimen (SWOG-9912 trial) was used. Age of the patient ranged from 34 years to 76 years. In total 600 cycles, 516 cycles (86 %) were completed. Seventy patients (70 %) received all the 6 cycles by IP route. Two in the initial 10 patients had vaginal leak, for whom first 2 cycles were given by IV route and then shifted to IP route. Subsequently all cases had double layer closure of vaginal vault. Nine patients (9 %) had port related complications, in which 8 were transient. Catheter block was seen in 5 cases, of which 4 salvaged by heparin injection lock for 2 h and in subsequent cases IV port access catheter with valve replaced the fenestrated IP catheter. None of the IV catheters had the block. Four cases had backflow of fluid around catheter collecting around the port chamber site. Two patients had severe abdominal pain due to dense adhesions and further cycles were completed by IV route. Cisplatin was replaced with carboplatin in 5 cases with severe toxicity. Longest follow-up is 4 years with median follow up of 1.8 years.70 % are disease free on follow up. Local recurrence rate was 18 and systemic in 8 cases. Mortality rate is 4 %. Complications of IP ports are low when insertion is done meticulously with a dedicated team. With modified IP dose and drug regimen, side effects are less and most patients can complete all the desired cycles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Intraperitoneal chemotherapy; Ovarian cancer

Year:  2012        PMID: 23997520      PMCID: PMC3444584          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-012-0166-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  23 in total

1.  Complications associated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy catheters.

Authors:  S Makhija; M Leitao; P Sabbatini; N Bellin; L Almadrones; L Leon; D R Spriggs; R Barakat
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Intraperitoneal chemotherapy: analysis of complications with an implanted subcutaneous port and catheter system.

Authors:  S A Davidson; S C Rubin; M Markman; W B Jones; T B Hakes; B Reichman; L Almadrones; D Chapman; J L Lewis; W J Hoskins
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  A case of protrusion of an intraperitoneal chemotherapy catheter through rectum.

Authors:  Y Bilsel; E Balik; D Bugra; S Yamaner; A Akyuz
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Progression-free and overall survival of a modified outpatient regimen of primary intravenous/intraperitoneal paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Joyce N Barlin; Fanny Dao; Nadim Bou Zgheib; Sarah E Ferguson; Paul J Sabbatini; Martee L Hensley; Katherine M Bell-McGuinn; Jason Konner; William P Tew; Carol Aghajanian; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Technical aspects of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in abdominal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  P Braly; J Doroshow; S Hoff
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D S Alberts; P Y Liu; E V Hannigan; R O'Toole; S D Williams; J A Young; E W Franklin; D L Clarke-Pearson; V K Malviya; B DuBeshter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Intraperitoneal chemotherapy: technical experience at five institutions.

Authors:  M J Piccart; J L Speyer; M Markman; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; D Alberts; J Jenkins; F Muggia
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a review of complications and completion rates.

Authors:  Lisa M Landrum; Michael A Gold; Kathleen N Moore; Tashanna K N Myers; D S McMeekin; Joan L Walker
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Pharmacokinetics of Ip cisplatin in refractory ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  R G Pretorius; N F Hacker; J S Berek; L C Ford; J D Hoeschele; T A Butler; L D Lagasse
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1983-12

10.  Clinical pharmacology of intraperitoneal cisplatin.

Authors:  J A Lopez; J G Krikorian; S D Reich; R D Smyth; F H Lee; B F Issell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Gynecological cancers: A summary of published Indian data.

Authors:  Amita Maheshwari; Neha Kumar; Umesh Mahantshetty
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.