Literature DB >> 23997381

RECENT PROGRESS IN THE NONPARAMETRIC ESTIMATION OF MONOTONE CURVES -WITH APPLICATIONS TO BIOASSAY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT.

Rabi Bhattacharya1, Lizhen Lin.   

Abstract

Three recent nonparametric methodologies for estimating a monotone regression function F and its inverse F-1 are (1) the inverse kernel method DNP (Dette et al. (2005), Dette and Scheder (2010)), (2) the monotone spline (Kong and Eubank (2006)) and (3) the data adaptive method NAM (Bhattacharya and Lin (2010), (2011)), with roots in isotonic regression (Ayer et al. (1955), Bhattacharya and Kong (2007)). All three have asymptotically optimal error rates. In this article their finite sample performances are compared using extensive simulation from diverse models of interest, and by analysis of real data. Let there be m distinct values of the independent variable x among N observations y. The results show that if m is relatively small compared to N then generally the NAM performs best, while the DNP outperforms the other methods when m is O(N) unless there is a substantial clustering of the values of the independent variable x.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23997381      PMCID: PMC3756697          DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal        ISSN: 0167-9473            Impact factor:   1.681


  5 in total

1.  Study of oxidative DNA damage in TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells by use of the in vitro micronucleus test: Determination of No-Observed-Effect Levels.

Authors:  Anne Platel; Fabrice Nesslany; Véronique Gervais; Daniel Marzin
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  An adaptive nonparametric method in benchmark analysis for bioassay and environmental studies.

Authors:  Rabi Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 0.870

3.  Monotone smoothing with application to dose-response curves and the assessment of synergism.

Authors:  C Kelly; J Rice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Nonparametric estimation of benchmark doses in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  NONPARAMETRIC BENCHMARK ANALYSIS IN RISK ASSESSMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BY SIMULATION AND DATA ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Rabi Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Sankhya Ser B       Date:  2011-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.