Literature DB >> 23996647

Assessment and spatial distribution of groundwater quality in industrial areas of Ghaziabad, India.

Savita Kumari1, Anil Kumar Singh, Ashok Kumar Verma, N P S Yaduvanshi.   

Abstract

An attempt has been made in this study to evaluate the groundwater quality in two industrial blocks of Ghaziabad district. Groundwater samples were collected from shallow wells, deep wells and hand pumps of two heavily industrialized blocks, namely Bulandshahar road industrial area and Meerut road industrial area in Ghaziabad district for assessing their suitability for various uses. Samples were collected from 30 sites in each block before and after monsoon. They were analyzed for a total of 23 elements, namely, Ag, Al, As, B, Ba, Be, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Se, U, V, and Zn. In addition to these elements, some other parameters were also studied viz: color, odor, turbidity, biological oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand (COD), dissolved oxygen, total dissolved solids and total suspended solid. The water quality index was also calculated based on some of the parameters estimated. Out of the 23 elements, the mean values of 12 elements, namely, Al, As, Ca, Cd, Cr, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Se, and U, were higher than the prescribed standard limits. The concentrations (in milligram per liter) of highly toxic metals viz., Al, As, Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb, Se, and U, ranged from 1.33-6.30, 0.04-0.54, 0.005-0.013, 4.51-7.09, 0.14-0.27, 0.13-0.32, 0.16-2.11, and 0.10-1.21, respectively, in all groundwater samples, while the permissible limits of these elements as per WHO/BIS standards for drinking are 0.2, 0.01, 0.003, 0.05, 0.07, 0.01, 0.04, and 0.03 mg L(-1), respectively. The EC, pH, and COD in all samples varied from 0.74-4.21, 6.05-7.72, and 4.5-20.0 while their permissible limits are 0.7 dS m(-1), 6.5-8.5, and 10 mg L(-1), respectively. On the basis of the above-mentioned parameters, the water quality index of all groundwater samples ranged from 101 to 491, and 871 to 2904 with mean value of 265 and 1,174 based on two criteria, i.e., physico-chemical and metal contaminations, respectively while the prescribed safe limit for drinking is below 50. The results revealed that the groundwater in the two blocks is unfit for drinking as per WHO/BIS guidelines. The presence of elements like As, Se, and U in toxic amounts is a matter of serious concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23996647     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3393-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  9 in total

1.  Heavy metal concentrations in groundwaters and soils of Thane Region of Maharashtra, India.

Authors:  Ganesh Ramdas Bhagure; S R Mirgane
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Evaluation of groundwater quality in and around Peenya industrial area of Bangalore, South India using GIS techniques.

Authors:  Anitha Pius; Charmaine Jerome; Nagaraja Sharma
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Impact of industrialization on groundwater quality--a case study of Peenya industrial area, Bangalore, India.

Authors:  B S Shankar; N Balasubramanya; M T Maruthesha Reddy
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Risk assessment due to intake of heavy metals through the ingestion of groundwater around two proposed uranium mining areas in Jharkhand, India.

Authors:  Soma Giri; Mukesh K Mahato; Gurdeep Singh; V N Jha
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Heavy metal contaminations in the groundwater of Brahmaputra flood plain: an assessment of water quality in Barpeta District, Assam (India).

Authors:  Nabanita Haloi; H P Sarma
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Groundwater quality and its suitability for domestic and agricultural use in Tondiar river basin, Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  K Ramesh; L Elango
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Application of water quality index for groundwater quality assessment: Thirumanimuttar sub-basin, Tamilnadu, India.

Authors:  M Vasanthavigar; K Srinivasamoorthy; K Vijayaragavan; R Rajiv Ganthi; S Chidambaram; P Anandhan; R Manivannan; S Vasudevan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Heavy metals assessment in urban soil around industrial clusters in Ghaziabad, India: probabilistic health risk approach.

Authors:  Mayuri Chabukdhara; Arvind K Nema
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 6.291

9.  Remote sensing and GIS techniques for evaluation of groundwater quality in municipal corporation of Hyderabad (Zone-V), India.

Authors:  S S Asadi; Padmaja Vuppala; M Anji Reddy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  The spatial and seasonal variability of the groundwater chemistry and quality in the exploited aquifer in the Daxing District, Beijing, China.

Authors:  Yuanzheng Zhai; Yan Lei; Jun Zhou; Muzi Li; Jinsheng Wang; Yanguo Teng
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Estimation of spatial distribution of heavy metals in groundwater using interpolation methods and multivariate statistical techniques; its suitability for drinking and irrigation purposes in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey.

Authors:  Hakan Arslan; Nazlı Ayyildiz Turan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Assessment of groundwater quality at a MSW landfill site using standard and AHP based water quality index: a case study from Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.

Authors:  Shubhrasekhar Chakraborty; R Naresh Kumar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Assessment of ammonium, nitrate, phosphate, and heavy metal pollution in groundwater from Amik Plain, southern Turkey.

Authors:  Necat Ağca; Sema Karanlık; Berkant Ödemiş
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Characterizing groundwater quality ranks for drinking purposes in Sylhet district, Bangladesh, using entropy method, spatial autocorrelation index, and geostatistics.

Authors:  Abu Reza Md Towfiqul Islam; Nasir Ahmed; Md Bodrud-Doza; Ronghao Chu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Socio-Environmental Determinants and Human Health Exposures in Arid and Semi-Arid Zones of Iran-Narrative Review.

Authors:  Laleh R Kalankesh; Susana Rodriguez-Couto; Ali Alami; Shahla Khosravan; Mehdi Meshki; Elshen Ahmadov; Ali Mohammadpour; Narges Bahri
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2022-04-14

7.  Determination of the Physicochemical Quality of Groundwater and its Potential Health Risk for Drinking in Oromia, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Binyam Gintamo; Mohammed Azhar Khan; Henok Gulilat; Rakesh Kumar Shukla; Zeleke Mekonnen
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2022-05-18

8.  Hydrochemical characteristics and quality assessment of deep groundwater from the coal-bearing aquifer of the Linhuan coal-mining district, Northern Anhui Province, China.

Authors:  Man-Li Lin; Wei-Hua Peng; He-Rong Gui
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Evaluation of water quality in surface water and shallow groundwater: a case study of a rare earth mining area in southern Jiangxi Province, China.

Authors:  Xiuzhen Hao; Dengjun Wang; Peiran Wang; Yuxia Wang; Dongmei Zhou
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.513

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.