Literature DB >> 2399626

[Surgical treatment of spastic bladder paralysis in paraplegic patients. Sacral deafferentation with implantation of a sacral anterior root stimulator].

D Sauerwein1.   

Abstract

Because of incalculable incontinence, recurrent urinary infections and morphological and functional damage of the urinary tract, treatment of the spastic bladder is frequently problematic in patients with spinal cord lesions. The operative method presented is designed to stop the spastic detrusor action and to achieve controlled low-resistance voiding. Using either an intradural or an extradural approach, the afferent and efferent nerves of the parasympathetic spinal center are identified. The posterior roots S2 to S5 are cut. Electrodes are implanted at the anterior roots, and these allow transmitter-controlled stimulation. From September 1986 to September 1989, 45 patients were treated by this method. Sacral deafferentation (SDAF) at S2 to S5 helped and the spasticity of the bladder disappeared. The patients achieved continence and a bladder volume of more than 500 ml. The frequency of infection was reduced and renal insufficiency was corrected. The use of a special stimulation technique (sacral anterior root stimulation; SARS) allowed low-resistance voiding and avoided the problem of dyssynergia. Patient acceptance of this operation is high because of the resulting improvement in the quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2399626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  13 in total

1.  [100 years urology in Germany. Neuro-urology].

Authors:  J Pannek; P M Braun; W Diederichs; M Hohenfellner; K P Jünemann; H Madersbacher; A Reitz; S Schumacher; M Stöhrer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Single-use intermittent catheterisation].

Authors:  U Grigoleit; J Pannek; M Stöhrer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Reconstructive urology in transition. From its origin into the all too near future].

Authors:  K-D Sievert; J Seibold; D Schultheiss; G Feil; H Sperling; M Fisch; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  [Neurourology. Current developments and therapeutic strategies].

Authors:  J Kutzenberger; J Pannek; M Stöhrer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Chronic infection of a Brindley sacral nerve root stimulator.

Authors:  Alexa Bramall; Bednash Chaudhary; Jamil Ahmad; Mohammed F Shamji
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-02-25

6.  Clinical significance of urodynamic study parameters in maintenance of renal function in spinal cord injury patients.

Authors:  Ji Cheol Shin; Youngsang Lee; HeaEun Yang; Dae Hyun Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2014-06-26

Review 7.  Neuroprostheses to treat neurogenic bladder dysfunction: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Nico J M Rijkhoff
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 8.  [Neurogenic urinary incontinence. Value of surgical management].

Authors:  J Kutzenberger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  S3 motor branch stimulation failure due to nerve fiber burning at the nerve-wire junction: A historical technical note.

Authors:  Zahra Emami; Najme-Sadat Moosavi; Majid Karimi; Alexander R Vaccaro; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-02-27

10.  Neurostimulation for neurogenic bowel dysfunction.

Authors:  J Worsøe; M Rasmussen; P Christensen; K Krogh
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.