Literature DB >> 23995957

HLA-DQ barrier: effects on cPRA calculations.

Anat R Tambur1, Joseph R Leventhal, R Carlin Walsh, Jennifer R Zitzner, John J Friedewald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Panel-reactive antibody (PRA) testing provides assessment of the breadth of sensitization a patient might have against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens. The evolution of calculated PRA (cPRA) reflects the commitment of the transplant community to increase accessibility and promote equity to all patients awaiting kidney transplantation. Recent data from our center and others, however, suggested that a significant diversity of HLA-DQ antigens is not captured, which may lead to inequity in allocating cPRA points.
METHODS: HLA-DRB1-DQA1-DQB1 typing of 2182 individuals was evaluated for this study using Luminex-based sequence-specific oligonucleotide typing. A total of 3182 haplotypes were confirmed to have the level of resolution required for this study.
RESULTS: The diversity of HLA-DQαβ alleles is greater than what is apparent using the serologic equivalents. The distribution of these alleles within a serologic group varies, with some alleles being more frequent than others; therefore, their representation within the current cPRA system is inaccurate. Three informative examples are given. Haplotypes of DR antigens with DQαβ alleles did not always follow the common published linkage disequilibrium, especially in populations where there is greater genetic diversity.
CONCLUSIONS: The current cPRA system does not take into account the distribution of molecular equivalents within DQ serologic specificities. This can result is inequitable allocation of sensitization points and disadvantaging the more sensitized patients. To ameliorate this situation, the United Network for Organ Sharing system should allow inputting HLA-DQαβ alleles both for donor typing and as antibody specificities, which will lead to better representation of unacceptable DQ alleles and improve organ allocation equity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23995957     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a452a5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

1.  Characteristics of Circulating Donor Human Leukocyte Antigen-specific Immunoglobulin G Antibodies Predictive of Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection and Kidney Allograft Failure.

Authors:  Dinesh Kannabhiran; John Lee; Joseph E Schwartz; Rex Friedlander; Meredith Aull; Thangamani Muthukumar; Sean Campbell; David Epstein; Surya V Seshan; Sandip Kapur; Vijay K Sharma; Manikkam Suthanthiran; Darshana Dadhania
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Immune Sensitization and Mortality in Wait-Listed Kidney Transplant Candidates.

Authors:  Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze; Kathryn J Tinckam; Andreas Laupacis; Alexander G Logan; Joseph Beyene; S Joseph Kim
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Impact of the Type of Dialysis on Time to Transplantation: Is It Just a Matter of Immunity?

Authors:  Matteo Righini; Irene Capelli; Marco Busutti; Concettina Raimondi; Giorgia Comai; Gabriele Donati; Maria Laura Cappuccilli; Matteo Ravaioli; Pasquale Chieco; Gaetano La Manna
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  cPRA Increases With DQA, DPA, and DPB Unacceptable Antigens in the Canadian cPRA Calculator.

Authors:  K J Tinckam; R Liwski; D Pochinco; M Mousseau; A Grattan; P Nickerson; P Campbell
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Assessment of Spanish Panel Reactive Antibody Calculator and Potential Usefulness.

Authors:  Esther Asensio; Marcos López-Hoyos; Íñigo Romón; Jesús Ontañón; David San Segundo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 7.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.